Literature DB >> 30321944

The burden of hardware removal in ankle fractures: How common is it, why do we do it and what is the cost? A ten-year review.

Christopher Fenelon1, Evelyn P Murphy2, John G Galbraith3, Stephen R Kearns4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ankle fractures account for 9% of all fractures and 40% require surgical management. The ankle is the most common site of hardware removal. The purpose of our study was to investigate the incidence, indication and economic cost associated with removal of hardware from the ankle.
METHODS: We conducted a ten-year retrospective review of 1482 patients treated by open reduction internal fixation for an unstable ankle fracture. Skeletally immature patients were excluded. Data collected was cross referenced from patient medical records, the radiological and electronic patient database. The casemix and hospital inpatient enquiry system (HIPE) were used to calculate costs.
RESULTS: The mean age was 39.9 years with 53.6% male. 185 patients (12.5%) underwent hardware removal with unplanned removal performed in 6% of cases. The average cost of removal was €1113.
CONCLUSION: Removal of hardware continues to be a common operation with significant costs to all involved. More than one in 10 patients underwent future removal of hardware. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.
Copyright © 2018 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle fracture; Cost; Hardware removal; Implant; Indication; Symptomatic; Unplanned

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30321944     DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1268-7731            Impact factor:   2.705


  5 in total

1.  Implant Removal Due to Infection After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: Trends and Predictors.

Authors:  Alec S Kellish; Alisina Shahi; Julio A Rodriguez; Kudret Usmani; Michael Boniello; Ali Oliashirazi; Kenneth Graf; Henry Dolch; David Fuller; Rakesh P Mashru
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  Outcomes of Surgical Reconstruction Using Custom 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Implants for Critical-Sized Bone Defects of the Foot and Ankle.

Authors:  Bijan Abar; Nicholas Kwon; Nicholas B Allen; Trent Lau; Lindsey G Johnson; Ken Gall; Samuel B Adams
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Nikke Partio; Tuomas T Huttunen; Heikki M Mäenpää; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Alterations in magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of bioabsorbable magnesium screws over time in humans: a retrospective single center study.

Authors:  Lena Sonnow; Andreas Ziegler; Gesa H Pöhler; Martin H Kirschner; Maximilian Richter; Mustafa Cetin; Melih Unal; Ozkan Kose
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2021-12-23

5.  Improvement in Functional Outcomes After Elective Symptomatic Orthopaedic Implant Removal.

Authors:  Benjamin R Williams; Dylan L McCreary; Harsh R Parikh; Melissa S Albersheim; Brian P Cunningham
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.