Sean Lynch1, Catherine Greeno1, Judith L Teich1, Janet Heekin1. 1. a U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration , Center for Behavioral Health Statistics & Quality , Rockville , MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of integration of pediatric integrated behavioral health service delivery models (IBHSDM) since it has not been well established. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of journal databases (e.g., PubMed) and Google searches was used to identify publications. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they examined children who were treated in an IBHSDM. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors extracted data from studies and assessed them for level of integration using a federal conceptual framework. DATA SYNTHESIS: Guided by PRISMA standards, the authors identified 40 journal articles that described 32 integrated delivery models. Five models (15.6%) were rated at integration level 1 or 2 (coordinated care), eight models (25%) were rated level 3 and five models (15.6%) were rated level 4 (co-located care), and fourteen models (43.8%) were rated level 5 or 6 (integrated care). CONCLUSIONS: In general, it is assumed that more completely integrated care will result in higher quality care and reduced costs. Thirteen of the models described (40.6%) had levels of integration of 3 or lower that may be too low to produce desired effects on quality and cost. Future research should address potential barriers that impede the development of models with higher degrees of integration.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of integration of pediatric integrated behavioral health service delivery models (IBHSDM) since it has not been well established. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of journal databases (e.g., PubMed) and Google searches was used to identify publications. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they examined children who were treated in an IBHSDM. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors extracted data from studies and assessed them for level of integration using a federal conceptual framework. DATA SYNTHESIS: Guided by PRISMA standards, the authors identified 40 journal articles that described 32 integrated delivery models. Five models (15.6%) were rated at integration level 1 or 2 (coordinated care), eight models (25%) were rated level 3 and five models (15.6%) were rated level 4 (co-located care), and fourteen models (43.8%) were rated level 5 or 6 (integrated care). CONCLUSIONS: In general, it is assumed that more completely integrated care will result in higher quality care and reduced costs. Thirteen of the models described (40.6%) had levels of integration of 3 or lower that may be too low to produce desired effects on quality and cost. Future research should address potential barriers that impede the development of models with higher degrees of integration.
Entities:
Keywords:
Children; adolescents; behavioral health; integrated care