| Literature DB >> 30320195 |
Melody Maarouf1, Clara Curiel-Lewandrowski2, Sarah Daley3, Phillip Kuo4, Emad Elquza5, Vivian Y Shi2.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords: PET, positron emission tomography; RCM, reflectance confocal microscopy; cholangiocarcinoma; cutaneous metastasis; erysipeloid; reflectance confocal microscopy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30320195 PMCID: PMC6180240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2018.06.018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JAAD Case Rep ISSN: 2352-5126
Fig 1Clinical, histopathologic, and reflectance-confocal microscopic images of cutaneous cholangiocarcinoma. A, Initially, the patient presented with a brightly erysipeloid, partially blanchable indurated plaque extending over the right abdominal wall, including the Whipple procedure scar (left). The arrow represents the initial punch biopsy site. After chemotherapy, the plaque became significantly smaller, faintly erythematous, and no longer indurated (right). B, Images show well-differentiated tumor deposits at 105 μm (red line, left panel) and 355 μm (red line, right panel) from the skin surface, which are composed of glandular structures with a desmoplastic stromal response. The malignant glands are lined by cuboidal to columnar cells with mild cellular atypia, irregular nuclear contours, and increased nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio. The epidermis appears unremarkable. (Hematoxylin-eosin stain; original magnification: ×10.) C, At 305 μm (left and middle panel), RCM detects clusters of large, oval and polygonal refractile edges with a hyporefractile center (blue arrow) indicative of tumor nests filled with mucinous material. Scanning of the same site (right panel) after treatment at multiple depths up to 305 μm across a 2-cm area failed to reveal evidence of tumor nests.