Literature DB >> 30319806

Different classical hydrogen-bonding patterns in three salicylaldoxime derivatives, 2-HO-4-XC6H3C=NOH (X = Me, OH and MeO).

Ligia R Gomes1,2, Marcus V N de Souza3, Cristiane F Da Costa3, James L Wardell3,4, John Nicolson Low4.   

Abstract

The crystal structures of three salicyaldoxime compounds, namely 2-hy-droxy-4-methyl-benzaldehyde oxime, C8H9NO2, 1, 2,4-di-hydroxy-benzaldehyde oxime, C7H7NO3, 2, and 2-hy-droxy-4-meth-oxy-benzaldehyde oxime, C8H9NO3, 3, are discussed. In each compound, the hydroxyl groups are essentially coplanar with their attached phenyl group. The inter-planar angles between the C=N-O moieties of the oxime unit and their attached phenyl rings are 0.08 (9), 1.08 (15) and 6.65 (15)° in 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In all three mol-ecules, the 2-hy-droxy group forms an intra-molecular O-H⋯N(oxime) hydrogen bond. In compound (1), inter-molecular O-H(oxime)⋯O(hydrox-yl) hydrogen bonds generate R 2 2(14) dimers, related by inversion centres. In compound 2, inter-molecular O-H(oxime)⋯O(4-hy-droxy) hydrogen bonds generate C9 chains along the b-axis direction, while O-H(4-hydrox-yl)⋯O(2-hydrox-yl) inter-actions form zigzag C6 spiral chains along the c-axis direction, generated by a screw axis at 1, y, 1/4: the combination of the two chains provides a bimolecular sheet running parallel to the b axis, which lies between 0-1/2 c and 1/2-1 c. In compound 3, similar C9 chains, along the b-axis direction are generated by O-H(oxime)⋯O(4-meth-oxy) hydrogen bonds. Further weaker, C-H⋯π (in 1), π-π (in 2) and both C-H⋯π and π-π inter-actions (in 3) further cement the three-dimensional structures. Hirshfeld surface and fingerprint analyses are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding; salicylaldoxime

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319806      PMCID: PMC6176434          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Aldoximes, RCH=NOH, are found in many biologically active compounds (Abele et al., 2008 ▸; Nikitjuka & Jirgensons 2014 ▸), having a diverse range of uses including as anti-tumor agents (Martínez-Pascual et al., 2017 ▸; Qin et al., 2017 ▸; Canario et al., 2018 ▸; Huang et al., 2018 ▸), acaricidal and insecticidal agents (Dai et al., 2017 ▸), thymidine phospho­rylase inhibitors (Zhao et al., 2018 ▸), anti-microbial agents (Yadav et al., 2017 ▸), bacteriocides (Kozlowska et al., 2017 ▸), anti-inflammatory agents (Mohassab et al., 2017 ▸) and in the treatment of nerve-gas poisoning (Lorke et al., 2008 ▸; Voicu et al., 2010 ▸; Katalinić et al., 2017 ▸; Radić et al., 2013 ▸). In the plant kingdom, oximes play a vital role in metabolism (Sørensen et al., 2018 ▸). A specific inter­est in 2-hydroxbenzaldehyde derivatives has arisen regarding their use as ligands for metal complexation (Wood et al., 2006 ▸, 2008b ▸). The compounds described herein are all salicylaldoxime derivatives (2-HO-4-X-C6H3-CH=NOH) with different substituents in the 4-position, namely a methyl group, a hy­droxy group and a meth­oxy group, respectively, in compounds, 1, 2 and 3. A frequent finding for salicylaldoxime derivatives is the formation of inversion-related (14) dimers, as concluded from a Cambridge Structural Database survey (CSD Version 5.39, May 2018 update; Groom et al., 2016 ▸). While the structures of many salicylaldoxime derivatives have been reported, the structures of very few compounds with an additional substituent in the 4 position are known. Compounds 1 and 3 have been shown to have significant activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis ATTC 27294. The full report will be published elsewhere (da Costa et al., 2018 ▸).

Structural commentary

There are no unusual features in the mol­ecular structures. Compound 1 (Fig. 1 ▸) crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/n with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit. Compounds 2 and 3 crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/c with one mol­ecule in the asymmetric unit (Figs. 2 ▸ and 3 ▸), all having an oxime unit with an (E) geometry. Bond angles and bond lengths in the phenyl and oxime fragments are all in the expected ranges.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of compound 1, showing 80% displacement ellipsoids.

Figure 2

The mol­ecular structure of compound 2, showing 80% displacement ellipsoids.

Figure 3

The mol­ecular structure of compound 3, showing 80% displacement ellipsoids.

In compound 1, the hydroxyl group is essentially coplanar with its attached phenyl group [displaced by 0.020 (1) Å], while the inter­planar angle between the C=NO moiety of the oxime unit and the attached phenyl rings is 0.08 (9)°. In compound 2, the hydroxyl groups lie essentially within the phenyl ring plane [O atoms deviate by −0.003 (1) and 0.006 (1) Å], while the inter­planar angle between the C=NO moiety of the oxime unit and the attached phenyl rings is 1.08 (15)°. In compound 3, the inter­planar angle between the C=NO moiety of the oxime unit and the attached phenyl rings is 6.65 (15)°. In all three mol­ecules, an intra­molecular O2—H2N12 hydrogen bond (Tables 1 ▸–3 ▸ ▸) forms a pseudo six-membered ring.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 1

Cg is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯N120.879 (18)1.814 (18)2.6066 (10)149.0 (15)
O13—H13⋯O2i 0.857 (17)2.019 (17)2.8132 (9)153.7 (15)
O13—H13⋯O13ii 0.857 (17)2.611 (16)2.8961 (14)100.8 (12)
C3—H3⋯Cg iii 0.952.713.4577 (9)136
C11—H11⋯Cg iv 0.952.733.4910 (9)138

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Table 2

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 2

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯N120.91 (3)1.77 (3)2.5899 (17)150 (2)
O4—H4⋯O2i 0.86 (2)1.85 (2)2.7062 (16)174 (2)
O13—H13⋯O4ii 0.86 (3)1.90 (3)2.7583 (16)171 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Table 3

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °) for 3

Cg is the centroid of the C1–C6 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯N120.92 (3)1.81 (3)2.6518 (19)152 (2)
O13—H13⋯O41i 0.91 (3)1.89 (3)2.7829 (18)169 (3)
C141—H14B⋯O2ii 0.982.623.412 (2)138
C3—H3⋯O2ii 0.952.703.570 (2)154
C11—H11⋯Cg iii 0.952.893.4524 (6)128

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

Supra­molecular features

Hydrogen Bonding

In the crystal of 1, mol­ecules are linked by O13—H13 ⋯O2 hydrogen bonds into inversion-related (14) dimers (Table 1 ▸). As stated above, such dimers are the most frequently found arrangement for salicyldoxime derivatives. These (14), or (10) (via the intra­molecular hydrogen bond) dimers are linked into two-mol­ecule-wide chains, propagating in the a-axis direction by pairs of O13—H13⋯O13 hydrogen bonds, thereby creating (4) rings, as shown in Fig. 4 ▸. The H13⋯O13 lengths in the O13—H13⋯O13ii hydrogen bond are rather long [2.611 (16) Å] with a small angle of 100.8 (12)°. However, such data fits well with published findings for H2O2 rings: a recent CSD (Groom et al., 2016 ▸) search revealed more than 500 entries for non-solvated structures having centrosymmetric H2O2 rings with H—O—H angles of 120° or less and H⋯O distances up to the sum of the van der Waals contact radii, 2.72 Å, of oxygen and hydrogen atoms. The two-mol­ecule-wide chains are further linked into a three-dimensional arrangement by C3—H3⋯Cg iii and C11—H11⋯ Cg iv inter­actions (Table 1 ▸). No π–π inter­actions can be identified.
Figure 4

Part of a two-mol­ecule-wide chain in 1 (symmetry codes as in Table 1 ▸).

Compound 2 with two hydroxyl groups, as well as the oxime moiety, produces a much more complex classical hydrogen-bonding arrangement than the one found for compound 1. The bonding arrangement in 2 can be readily considered to be composed of two elements: a C9 chain, generated from O13—H13(oxime)⋯O4(4-hy­droxy)ii hydrogen bonds, propagating in the direction of the b axis, see Fig. 5 ▸, and secondly a zigzag C6 spiral chain formed from O4—H4⋯O2i hydrogen bonds, see Fig. 6 ▸. The C6 and C9 chains combine to form a bimol­ecular sheet running parallel to the b axis which lies between 0–½ c and ½–1 c. These sheets are further linked by moderately strong π–π stacking inter­actions, involving all the phenyl rings in the sheet: the CgCg separation is 3.7242 (13) Å with a phenyl ring slippage of 1.586 Å. The lack of an (14) dimer in 2 is apparent and results from the preferential inter­action of the oxime group with the 4-hydroxyl group rather than with the 2-hy­droxy group.
Figure 5

Compound 2. Part of a C9 chain, propagating in the b-axis direction, formed by O13—H13⋯O4 hydrogen bonds.

Figure 6

Compound 2, part of a spiral C6 chain formed from O4—H4⋯O2 hydrogen bonds

In compound 3, C9 chains are generated from O13—H13⋯O41(meth­oxy)i hydrogen bonds, which propagate in the direction of the b axis, see Fig. 7 ▸. This chain is similar to that found in compound 2, but involving the meth­oxy oxygen atom O41 involved instead of the hy­droxy oxygen O4. Inter­estingly, the parameters of the two hydrogen bonds in the chains of compound 2 and 3 are very similar. The chains in compound 3 are linked into a two-dimensional array by C11—H11⋯Cg (Table 3 ▸) and π–π inter­actions. The centroid–centroid separation in the π–π inter­action is 3.7926 (12) Å with a phenyl ring slippage of 1.571 Å – again similar parameters are found in the inter­actions of compounds 2 and 3. The lack of an (14) dimer results from the preferential inter­action of the oxime group with the 4-meth­oxy group rather than with the 2-hy­droxy group. The C141—H14B⋯O2ii and C3—H3⋯O2iii hydrogen bonds link the molecules into centrosymmetric dimers across the centre of symmetry at (½, 0, ½). The former hydrogen bond forms (14) rings, and the latter (8) rings. These link anti-parallel C9 chains, forming a corrugated ribbon which runs parallel to the a axis.
Figure 7

Compound 3, part of a C9 chain of mol­ecules formed by O13—H13⋯O41 hydrogen bonds, propagating along the a-axis direction.

Hirshfeld Surface Analyses

The Hirshfeld surfaces (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸) and two-dimensional fingerprint (FP) plots (Spackman & McKinnon, 2002 ▸) provide complementary information concerning the inter­molecular inter­actions discussed above. The analyses were generated using CrystalExplorer3.1 (Wolff et al., 2012 ▸). The Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm for 1–3 are illustrated in Fig. 8 ▸. The intense red areas on the surfaces correspond to O⋯H close contacts. The less intense red spot on the surface of 1 relates to a O⋯O short contact. The fingerprint plots are shown in Fig. 9 ▸. The percentage contributions to the Hirshfeld surface of the various atom⋯atom contacts shown in Table 4 ▸ are derived from the fingerprint plots.
Figure 8

Views of the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm for 1–3. In each case, the red areas relate to classical hydrogen bonds.

Figure 9

The FP plots for 1, 2 and 3. The pair of southwest spikes are due to the O⋯H /H⋯O close contacts. The highest intensity of pixels in the FP plot for 2 at d e/d i = 1.8 Å includes C⋯C contacts.

Table 4

Percentages of atom–atom contacts for compounds 1–3

Compound 1 2 3
H⋯H42.736.941.5
H⋯O/O⋯H21.433.827.9
H⋯C/C⋯H29.110.015.5
H⋯N/N⋯H5.42.94.1
C⋯C10.85.8
O⋯C/C⋯O1.22.23.1
N⋯O/O⋯N2.00.7
N⋯C/C⋯N
O⋯O0.2
There are some differences in the percentage of close contacts listed in Table 4 ▸ between the (14) dimer formed by compound 1 and the mol­ecular chains formed by compounds 2 and 3. Thus compound 1 exhibits the highest percentage of H⋯C/ C⋯H close contacts, but no CC and N⋯O/ O⋯N close contacts, unlike compounds 2 and 3, and is the only one of the three compounds to have any close O⋯O contacts, albeit a very small percentage. It has to be said that the different substituents, especially the number of hydroxyl units, and other inter­actions, such as C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions, will have significant effects on the hydrogen-bonding.

Database survey

A survey of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.39, May 2018 update; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) of the hydrogen-bonding patterns of oximes confirmed the invariable occurrence for salicylaldoximes, RCH=N—OH (where R is a 2-hy­droxy­phenyl derivative) of the formation of intra­molecular O—H⋯NO(oxime) hydrogen bonds involv­ing the ortho hydroxyl group. In addition, this hydroxyl group is also most frequently involved in inter­molecular inter­actions producing inversion-related (14) dimers (Smith et al., 2003 ▸; Wood et al., 2006 ▸, 2008b ▸). Exceptions include MXSALO [R = 2-HO-5-MeOC6H3, producing a C5 chain from O—H(oxime)⋯O(2-hydrox­yl) hydrogen bonds; Pfluger et al., 1978 ▸], YUPSOT [R = 2-HO-5-Bu-C6H3, producing a C5 chain from O—H(oxime)⋯O(2-hydrox­yl) hydrogen bonds; White et al., 2015a ▸], YUPROS [R = 2-HO-3-Me-5-(piperin-1-yl-CH2)-C6H2, producing a C9 chain from O—H(oxime)⋯N(piperin­yl) hydrogen bonds; White et al., 2015b ▸] and XUSPIL [R = 2-HO-3-(piperin-1-ylmeth­yl)-5-Bu-C6H2, producing a C9 chain from O—H(oxime)⋯N(piperin­yl) hydrogen bonds; Forgan et al., 2010 ▸]. The compounds 2-HO-3-MeOC6H3CH=N—OH (ABULIT01–07; Forgan et al., 2007 ▸; Wood et al., 2008a ▸) and 2-HO-3-EtOC6H3CH=N—OH (HAHGAA; Cai, 2011 ▸) both form (14) dimers, in contrast to the chain forming 2-HO-4-MeOC6H3CH=N—OH (this study) and 2-HO-5-MeOC6H3CH=N—OH (MXSALO; Pfluger et al., 1978 ▸) and 2-HO-5-BuOC6H3CH=N—OH (YUPSOT; White et al., 2015a ▸). An earlier search (Low et al., 2010 ▸) indicated that the most frequently found hydrogen-bonding arrangements for oximes without a 2-hy­droxy­phenyl group are inversion-related (6) dimers and C3 chains.

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compounds were prepared from hydroxyl­amine and the corresponding benzaldehyde in methanol in the presence of potassium carbonate and were recrystallized from methanol. Compound 1, m.p. 378–379 K. Compound 2, m.p. 451–452 K. Compound 3, m.p. 410–411 K.

Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 5 ▸. All hydroxyl H atoms were refined isotropically. Those attached to C atoms were refined as riding atoms with C—H = 0.95–0.98 Å and U iso(H) = 1.2–1.5U iso(C).
Table 5

Experimental details

  1 2 3
Crystal data
Chemical formulaC8H9NO2 C7H7NO3 C8H9NO3
M r 151.16153.14167.16
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/n Monoclinic, P21/c Monoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)100100100
a, b, c (Å)6.5507 (2), 7.2523 (2), 15.5478 (4)3.7241 (1), 8.6902 (2), 20.7570 (5)9.3591 (13), 6.2634 (7), 13.6260 (2)
β (°)96.737 (3)92.501 (2)108.636 (16)
V3)733.54 (4)671.12 (3)756.87 (15)
Z 444
Radiation typeMo KαMo KαMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.100.120.11
Crystal size (mm)0.25 × 0.15 × 0.020.20 × 0.10 × 0.050.15 × 0.05 × 0.01
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku FRE+ AFC12 with HyPix 6000 detectorRigaku FRE+ AFC12 with HyPix 6000 detectorRigaku FRE+ AFC12 with HyPix 6000 detector
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (CrysAlis PRO ; Rigaku OD, 2017)Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO ; Rigaku OD, 2017)Multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Rigaku OD, 2017)
T min, T max 0.742, 1.0000.654, 1.0000.305, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections16323, 1696, 156029482, 1537, 14825525, 1686, 1323
R int 0.0240.0390.060
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.6490.6490.648
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.032, 0.100, 1.080.040, 0.092, 0.860.049, 0.158, 1.01
No. of reflections169615371686
No. of parameters109113118
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinementH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinementH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.33, −0.200.38, −0.210.26, −0.29

Computer programs: CrysAlis PRO (Rigaku OD, 2017 ▸), OSCAIL (McArdle et al., 2004 ▸), SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), ShelXle (Hübschle et al., 2011 ▸), SHELXL2017/1 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) 1, 2, 3, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm2128sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 1. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm21281sup2.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 2. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm21282sup3.hkl Structure factors: contains datablock(s) 3. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm21283sup4.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm21281sup5.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm21282sup6.cml Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018013361/qm21283sup7.cml CCDC references: 1868656, 1868655, 1868654 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C8H9NO2F(000) = 320
Mr = 151.16Dx = 1.369 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
a = 6.5507 (2) ÅCell parameters from 8222 reflections
b = 7.2523 (2) Åθ = 3.1–31.9°
c = 15.5478 (4) ŵ = 0.10 mm1
β = 96.737 (3)°T = 100 K
V = 733.54 (4) Å3Plate, brown
Z = 40.25 × 0.15 × 0.02 mm
Rigaku FRE+ AFC12 with HyPix 6000 detector diffractometer1696 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode, Rigaku FRE+1560 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Confocal mirrors, VHF Varimax monochromatorRint = 0.024
Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.6°
profile data from ω–scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlisPro ; Rigaku OD, 2017)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.742, Tmax = 1.000l = −20→20
16323 measured reflections
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.032H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.100w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0569P)2 + 0.1857P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1696 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.33 e Å3
109 parametersΔρmin = −0.20 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.62147 (10)0.55213 (9)0.38936 (4)0.01715 (19)
H20.520 (3)0.516 (2)0.4176 (11)0.046 (4)*
O130.11027 (10)0.35295 (10)0.46255 (4)0.01893 (19)
H130.155 (2)0.389 (2)0.5139 (11)0.041 (4)*
N120.27030 (11)0.40720 (11)0.41612 (5)0.01501 (19)
C10.38496 (13)0.41353 (12)0.27677 (5)0.0129 (2)
C20.57244 (13)0.50209 (12)0.30486 (5)0.0131 (2)
C30.71163 (13)0.54354 (12)0.24671 (6)0.0139 (2)
H30.8373320.6032080.2667990.017*
C40.66904 (13)0.49864 (12)0.15934 (6)0.0137 (2)
C50.48296 (14)0.41041 (12)0.13081 (6)0.0144 (2)
H50.4517500.3790460.0713980.017*
C60.34460 (13)0.36875 (12)0.18861 (6)0.0139 (2)
H60.2194710.3085030.1681960.017*
C110.23470 (13)0.36707 (12)0.33550 (6)0.0139 (2)
H110.1102650.3069890.3139530.017*
C410.81701 (14)0.54974 (13)0.09625 (6)0.0173 (2)
H41A0.8145960.4546500.0513600.026*
H41B0.9560690.5593620.1269450.026*
H41C0.7767790.6684980.0693460.026*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0175 (3)0.0221 (4)0.0115 (3)−0.0050 (3)0.0003 (2)−0.0029 (2)
O130.0156 (3)0.0260 (4)0.0162 (3)−0.0046 (3)0.0059 (3)−0.0030 (3)
N120.0137 (4)0.0158 (4)0.0162 (4)−0.0005 (3)0.0048 (3)0.0001 (3)
C10.0133 (4)0.0110 (4)0.0141 (4)0.0013 (3)0.0009 (3)0.0004 (3)
C20.0159 (4)0.0114 (4)0.0115 (4)0.0016 (3)−0.0009 (3)−0.0006 (3)
C30.0135 (4)0.0124 (4)0.0153 (4)−0.0004 (3)−0.0001 (3)0.0000 (3)
C40.0152 (4)0.0112 (4)0.0147 (4)0.0020 (3)0.0016 (3)0.0009 (3)
C50.0166 (4)0.0137 (4)0.0124 (4)0.0015 (3)−0.0009 (3)−0.0008 (3)
C60.0133 (4)0.0122 (4)0.0153 (4)0.0005 (3)−0.0016 (3)−0.0009 (3)
C110.0132 (4)0.0118 (4)0.0164 (4)0.0007 (3)0.0007 (3)−0.0005 (3)
C410.0177 (4)0.0192 (4)0.0153 (4)−0.0016 (3)0.0029 (3)0.0000 (3)
O2—C21.3645 (10)C3—H30.9500
O2—H20.879 (18)C4—C51.4018 (13)
O13—N121.3973 (9)C4—C411.5041 (12)
O13—H130.857 (17)C5—C61.3826 (12)
N12—C111.2812 (11)C5—H50.9500
C1—C61.4033 (12)C6—H60.9500
C1—C21.4091 (12)C11—H110.9500
C1—C111.4584 (12)C41—H41A0.9800
C2—C31.3902 (12)C41—H41B0.9800
C3—C41.3928 (12)C41—H41C0.9800
C2—O2—H2107.2 (11)C6—C5—C4120.40 (8)
N12—O13—H13101.6 (11)C6—C5—H5119.8
C11—N12—O13112.33 (7)C4—C5—H5119.8
C6—C1—C2117.75 (8)C5—C6—C1121.44 (8)
C6—C1—C11119.63 (8)C5—C6—H6119.3
C2—C1—C11122.61 (8)C1—C6—H6119.3
O2—C2—C3118.06 (8)N12—C11—C1120.08 (8)
O2—C2—C1121.18 (8)N12—C11—H11120.0
C3—C2—C1120.75 (8)C1—C11—H11120.0
C2—C3—C4120.80 (8)C4—C41—H41A109.5
C2—C3—H3119.6C4—C41—H41B109.5
C4—C3—H3119.6H41A—C41—H41B109.5
C3—C4—C5118.86 (8)C4—C41—H41C109.5
C3—C4—C41120.51 (8)H41A—C41—H41C109.5
C5—C4—C41120.60 (8)H41B—C41—H41C109.5
C6—C1—C2—O2179.14 (7)C3—C4—C5—C6−0.06 (13)
C11—C1—C2—O2−1.14 (14)C41—C4—C5—C6−178.02 (8)
C6—C1—C2—C30.13 (13)C4—C5—C6—C10.24 (14)
C11—C1—C2—C3179.86 (8)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.28 (13)
O2—C2—C3—C4−178.99 (7)C11—C1—C6—C5179.99 (7)
C1—C2—C3—C40.04 (14)O13—N12—C11—C1179.95 (7)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.08 (13)C6—C1—C11—N12179.91 (8)
C2—C3—C4—C41177.88 (7)C2—C1—C11—N120.19 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N120.879 (18)1.814 (18)2.6066 (10)149.0 (15)
O13—H13···O2i0.857 (17)2.019 (17)2.8132 (9)153.7 (15)
O13—H13···O13ii0.857 (17)2.611 (16)2.8961 (14)100.8 (12)
C3—H3···Cgiii0.952.713.4577 (9)136
C11—H11···Cgiv0.952.733.4910 (9)138
C7H7NO3F(000) = 320
Mr = 153.14Dx = 1.516 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
a = 3.7241 (1) ÅCell parameters from 13388 reflections
b = 8.6902 (2) Åθ = 1.9–32.1°
c = 20.7570 (5) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
β = 92.501 (2)°T = 100 K
V = 671.12 (3) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.20 × 0.10 × 0.05 mm
Rigaku FRE+ AFC12 with HyPix 6000 detector diffractometer1537 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode, Rigaku FRE+1482 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Confocal mirrors, VHF Varimax monochromatorRint = 0.039
Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.0°
profile data from ω–scansh = −4→4
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlisPro ; Rigaku OD, 2017)k = −11→11
Tmin = 0.654, Tmax = 1.000l = −26→26
29482 measured reflections
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.040H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.092w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0229P)2 + 1.3357P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 0.86(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1537 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.38 e Å3
113 parametersΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refined as a 2-component twin.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.6604 (3)0.13314 (13)0.28983 (5)0.0175 (3)
H20.568 (7)0.056 (3)0.3130 (12)0.045 (7)*
O41.0469 (3)0.64910 (12)0.32704 (5)0.0167 (3)
H41.132 (6)0.639 (3)0.2893 (11)0.031 (6)*
O130.2536 (3)−0.13686 (13)0.41952 (6)0.0213 (3)
H130.208 (7)−0.200 (3)0.3880 (12)0.043 (7)*
N120.3984 (4)−0.01346 (15)0.38573 (6)0.0161 (3)
C10.6052 (4)0.24418 (16)0.39524 (7)0.0125 (3)
C20.7061 (4)0.25485 (16)0.33098 (7)0.0129 (3)
C30.8530 (4)0.38889 (17)0.30720 (7)0.0133 (3)
H30.91930.39460.26360.016*
C40.9020 (4)0.51454 (17)0.34786 (7)0.0133 (3)
C50.8047 (4)0.50773 (17)0.41191 (7)0.0148 (3)
H50.83790.59430.43950.018*
C60.6596 (4)0.37332 (17)0.43460 (7)0.0141 (3)
H60.59470.36830.47830.017*
C110.4474 (4)0.10553 (17)0.42134 (7)0.0144 (3)
H110.38050.10340.46500.017*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0273 (6)0.0106 (5)0.0150 (5)−0.0041 (5)0.0047 (4)−0.0036 (4)
O40.0249 (6)0.0096 (5)0.0161 (5)−0.0052 (4)0.0051 (4)0.0002 (4)
O130.0335 (7)0.0110 (5)0.0194 (6)−0.0095 (5)0.0025 (5)0.0019 (4)
N120.0189 (6)0.0103 (6)0.0191 (6)−0.0029 (5)0.0010 (5)0.0030 (5)
C10.0127 (7)0.0096 (6)0.0151 (7)0.0003 (5)0.0005 (5)0.0003 (5)
C20.0142 (7)0.0101 (6)0.0143 (7)0.0008 (5)−0.0003 (5)−0.0023 (5)
C30.0149 (7)0.0123 (7)0.0126 (6)0.0003 (6)0.0020 (5)0.0000 (5)
C40.0135 (7)0.0087 (6)0.0176 (7)−0.0005 (5)0.0009 (5)0.0020 (5)
C50.0180 (7)0.0106 (7)0.0158 (7)−0.0010 (6)0.0015 (6)−0.0027 (5)
C60.0158 (7)0.0132 (7)0.0135 (7)−0.0005 (6)0.0021 (5)−0.0010 (5)
C110.0158 (7)0.0117 (7)0.0156 (7)−0.0003 (6)0.0003 (5)0.0019 (5)
O2—C21.3655 (17)C1—C111.456 (2)
O2—H20.91 (3)C2—C31.387 (2)
O4—C41.3660 (17)C3—C41.387 (2)
O4—H40.86 (2)C3—H30.9500
O13—N121.4020 (16)C4—C51.394 (2)
O13—H130.86 (3)C5—C61.378 (2)
N12—C111.280 (2)C5—H50.9500
C1—C61.398 (2)C6—H60.9500
C1—C21.405 (2)C11—H110.9500
C2—O2—H2106.5 (16)O4—C4—C3121.64 (13)
C4—O4—H4111.3 (15)O4—C4—C5117.43 (13)
N12—O13—H1399.9 (16)C3—C4—C5120.93 (14)
C11—N12—O13112.18 (13)C6—C5—C4118.93 (14)
C6—C1—C2117.65 (13)C6—C5—H5120.5
C6—C1—C11119.85 (13)C4—C5—H5120.5
C2—C1—C11122.50 (13)C5—C6—C1121.98 (14)
O2—C2—C3117.93 (13)C5—C6—H6119.0
O2—C2—C1120.77 (13)C1—C6—H6119.0
C3—C2—C1121.30 (13)N12—C11—C1120.25 (14)
C2—C3—C4119.22 (13)N12—C11—H11119.9
C2—C3—H3120.4C1—C11—H11119.9
C4—C3—H3120.4
C6—C1—C2—O2−179.97 (14)O4—C4—C5—C6−179.63 (14)
C11—C1—C2—O2−0.2 (2)C3—C4—C5—C60.3 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.3 (2)C4—C5—C6—C1−0.4 (2)
C11—C1—C2—C3179.41 (14)C2—C1—C6—C50.4 (2)
O2—C2—C3—C4179.88 (13)C11—C1—C6—C5−179.33 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C40.2 (2)O13—N12—C11—C1178.31 (12)
C2—C3—C4—O4179.71 (14)C6—C1—C11—N12−179.63 (14)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.2 (2)C2—C1—C11—N120.6 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N120.91 (3)1.77 (3)2.5899 (17)150 (2)
O4—H4···O2i0.86 (2)1.85 (2)2.7062 (16)174 (2)
O13—H13···O4ii0.86 (3)1.90 (3)2.7583 (16)171 (2)
C8H9NO3F(000) = 352
Mr = 167.16Dx = 1.467 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71075 Å
a = 9.3591 (13) ÅCell parameters from 1379 reflections
b = 6.2634 (7) Åθ = 3.3–30.2°
c = 13.6260 (2) ŵ = 0.11 mm1
β = 108.636 (16)°T = 100 K
V = 756.87 (15) Å3Plate, colourless
Z = 40.15 × 0.05 × 0.01 mm
Rigaku FRE+ AFC12 with HyPix 6000 detector diffractometer1686 independent reflections
Radiation source: Rotating Anode, Rigaku FRE+1323 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Confocal mirrors, VHF Varimax monochromatorRint = 0.060
Detector resolution: 10 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.4°, θmin = 2.3°
profile data from ω–scansh = −11→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlisPro; Rigaku OD, 2017)k = −7→7
Tmin = 0.305, Tmax = 1.000l = −17→17
5525 measured reflections
Refinement on F20 restraints
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.049H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.158w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1063P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.00(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
1686 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.26 e Å3
118 parametersΔρmin = −0.29 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O20.63191 (14)0.1847 (2)0.42822 (9)0.0193 (3)
H20.711 (3)0.265 (5)0.423 (2)0.049 (7)*
O130.91351 (14)0.6293 (2)0.38674 (10)0.0228 (4)
H130.981 (3)0.524 (5)0.388 (2)0.062 (9)*
O410.10398 (13)0.30632 (19)0.36291 (8)0.0182 (3)
N120.78766 (16)0.5076 (2)0.38782 (11)0.0175 (4)
C10.52304 (18)0.5260 (3)0.36005 (11)0.0145 (4)
C20.51014 (18)0.3173 (3)0.39480 (11)0.0147 (4)
C30.37212 (18)0.2374 (3)0.39667 (12)0.0158 (4)
H30.3650660.0971180.4211990.019*
C40.24440 (19)0.3667 (3)0.36197 (12)0.0150 (4)
C50.25337 (19)0.5722 (3)0.32479 (12)0.0172 (4)
H50.1653540.6576700.2993660.021*
C60.39104 (19)0.6495 (3)0.32543 (12)0.0158 (4)
H60.3971950.7907610.3017400.019*
C110.66646 (18)0.6195 (3)0.36181 (12)0.0157 (4)
H110.6702490.7652450.3434580.019*
C1410.0866 (2)0.0952 (3)0.39792 (14)0.0220 (4)
H14A−0.0181850.0740610.3956370.033*
H14B0.1536670.0768250.4691610.033*
H14C0.112340−0.0096590.3528990.033*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O20.0191 (7)0.0148 (6)0.0240 (7)0.0044 (5)0.0068 (5)0.0056 (5)
O130.0187 (6)0.0164 (7)0.0360 (8)−0.0006 (5)0.0127 (5)0.0018 (5)
O410.0181 (6)0.0152 (7)0.0220 (6)0.0002 (5)0.0075 (5)0.0021 (4)
N120.0179 (7)0.0163 (8)0.0200 (7)−0.0027 (5)0.0083 (6)−0.0003 (5)
C10.0200 (8)0.0122 (8)0.0122 (8)−0.0001 (6)0.0062 (6)−0.0011 (6)
C20.0175 (8)0.0147 (8)0.0121 (7)0.0024 (6)0.0051 (6)−0.0005 (6)
C30.0216 (9)0.0118 (8)0.0149 (8)0.0013 (6)0.0073 (6)0.0007 (6)
C40.0180 (8)0.0155 (9)0.0119 (7)−0.0001 (6)0.0054 (6)−0.0024 (6)
C50.0204 (8)0.0150 (8)0.0160 (8)0.0045 (6)0.0055 (6)0.0006 (6)
C60.0235 (9)0.0106 (8)0.0139 (8)0.0017 (6)0.0068 (6)0.0008 (6)
C110.0204 (9)0.0131 (8)0.0143 (8)0.0004 (6)0.0065 (6)−0.0004 (5)
C1410.0225 (9)0.0144 (9)0.0290 (9)−0.0018 (7)0.0082 (7)0.0031 (7)
O2—C21.365 (2)C3—C41.395 (2)
O2—H20.92 (3)C3—H30.9500
O13—N121.4067 (18)C4—C51.396 (2)
O13—H130.91 (3)C5—C61.374 (2)
O41—C41.371 (2)C5—H50.9500
O41—C1411.432 (2)C6—H60.9500
N12—C111.283 (2)C11—H110.9500
C1—C21.409 (2)C141—H14A0.9800
C1—C61.405 (2)C141—H14B0.9800
C1—C111.458 (2)C141—H14C0.9800
C2—C31.393 (2)
C2—O2—H2104.4 (17)C6—C5—C4119.18 (15)
N12—O13—H13100.6 (19)C6—C5—H5120.4
C4—O41—C141117.95 (13)C4—C5—H5120.4
C11—N12—O13111.75 (14)C5—C6—C1122.04 (15)
C2—C1—C6117.58 (15)C5—C6—H6119.0
C2—C1—C11123.02 (15)C1—C6—H6119.0
C6—C1—C11119.37 (15)N12—C11—C1120.87 (16)
O2—C2—C3117.11 (15)N12—C11—H11119.6
O2—C2—C1121.63 (15)C1—C11—H11119.6
C3—C2—C1121.26 (15)O41—C141—H14A109.5
C4—C3—C2118.99 (15)O41—C141—H14B109.5
C4—C3—H3120.5H14A—C141—H14B109.5
C2—C3—H3120.5O41—C141—H14C109.5
O41—C4—C3123.83 (15)H14A—C141—H14C109.5
O41—C4—C5115.24 (14)H14B—C141—H14C109.5
C3—C4—C5120.92 (16)
C6—C1—C2—O2178.92 (13)C2—C3—C4—C50.7 (2)
C11—C1—C2—O2−3.1 (2)O41—C4—C5—C6177.11 (13)
C6—C1—C2—C3−1.2 (2)C3—C4—C5—C6−1.9 (2)
C11—C1—C2—C3176.75 (14)C4—C5—C6—C11.6 (2)
O2—C2—C3—C4−179.21 (13)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.1 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C40.9 (2)C11—C1—C6—C5−178.10 (14)
C141—O41—C4—C3−2.5 (2)O13—N12—C11—C1−178.61 (13)
C141—O41—C4—C5178.56 (14)C2—C1—C11—N125.8 (2)
C2—C3—C4—O41−178.25 (14)C6—C1—C11—N12−176.33 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O2—H2···N120.92 (3)1.81 (3)2.6518 (19)152 (2)
O13—H13···O41i0.91 (3)1.89 (3)2.7829 (18)169 (3)
C141—H14B···O2ii0.982.623.412 (2)138
C3—H3···O2ii0.952.703.570 (2)154
C11—H11···Cgiii0.952.893.4524 (6)128
  18 in total

1.  Supramolecular chemistry in metal recovery; H-bond buttressing to tune extractant strength.

Authors:  Ross S Forgan; Peter A Wood; John Campbell; David K Henderson; Fiona E McAllister; Simon Parsons; Elna Pidcock; Ronald M Swart; Peter A Tasker
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Cation and anion selectivity of zwitterionic salicylaldoxime metal salt extractants.

Authors:  Ross S Forgan; James E Davidson; Francesca P A Fabbiani; Stuart G Galbraith; David K Henderson; Stephen A Moggach; Simon Parsons; Peter A Tasker; Fraser J White
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of sulfur-containing shikonin oxime derivatives as potential antineoplastic agents.

Authors:  Guang Huang; Hui-Ran Zhao; Qing-Qing Meng; Qi-Jing Zhang; Jin-Yun Dong; Bao-Quan Zhu; Shao-Shun Li
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Effect of pressure on the crystal structure of salicylaldoxime-I, and the structure of salicylaldoxime-II at 5.93 GPa.

Authors:  Peter A Wood; Ross S Forgan; David Henderson; Simon Parsons; Elna Pidcock; Peter A Tasker; John E Warren
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  2006-11-14

5.  Catalytic detoxification of nerve agent and pesticide organophosphates by butyrylcholinesterase assisted with non-pyridinium oximes.

Authors:  Zoran Radić; Trevor Dale; Zrinka Kovarik; Suzana Berend; Edzna Garcia; Limin Zhang; Gabriel Amitai; Carol Green; Božica Radić; Brendan M Duggan; Dariush Ajami; Julius Rebek; Palmer Taylor
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1-(aryl-aldehyde-oxime)uracil derivatives as a new class of thymidine phosphorylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Shuyue Zhao; Ke Li; Yi Jin; Jun Lin
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 7.  Entry of oximes into the brain: a review.

Authors:  D E Lorke; H Kalasz; G A Petroianu; K Tekes
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.