Literature DB >> 30319798

Crystal Structure of (E)-2-(3,3,3-tri-fluoro-prop-1-en-1-yl)aniline.

Koji Kubono1, Keita Tani1, Masaaki Omote2, Futa Ogawa2, Taisuke Matsumoto3.   

Abstract

The mol-ecule of the title compound, C9H8F3N, adopts an E configuration with respect to the C=C double bond. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the prop-1-enyl group is 25.4 (3)°. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked via pairs of N-H⋯F hydrogen bonds into inversion dimers with an R 2 2(16) ring motif. The dimers are linked by C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming a ribbon structure along the b-axis direction. The ribbons are linked by N-H⋯π and C-H⋯π inter-actions, generating a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en; aniline; crystal structure; hydrogen bonding

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319798      PMCID: PMC6176427          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Fluorescein, rhodamine etc. are water-soluble fluorescent reagents. Their derivatives exhibit strong fluorescence in aqueous solution and so can be utilized as ion-probes and in bio-imaging (Aron et al., 2016 ▸; Li et al., 2016 ▸). However, complicated procedures are required to obtain them. It is therefore desirable to develop a new fluorescent reagent with a simple structure that can be obtained by a short-step synthetic process. The title compound has a quite simple structure and is a small mol­ecule, consisting of aniline and 3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-enyl units, which emits strong fluorescence not only in organic solvents but also in an aqueous medium (H2O/DMSO, 90:10, v/v). Since aniline derivatives with 2,4-bis­(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl) have been used as fluoro­genic substrates for dipepeptidyl peptidase-4 (Ogawa et al., 2017 ▸), the title compound can be treated as a simple but essential component in emitting fluorescence. Hence, it is important to study the relationship between the fluorescent properties and the mol­ecular structure of the title compound. We report here its mol­ecular and crystal structure.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The mol­ecule adopts an E configuration with respect to the C=C double bond. The dihedral angle between the benzene ring and the prop-1-enyl group is 25.4 (3)°. The C5—C10—C11—C12 and C9—C10—C11—C12 torsion angles are −158.9 (3) and 24.6 (4)°, respectively. The bond lengths and angles in the title compound are normal and agree with those in other tri­fluoro­propenylaniline compounds (Shimizu et al., 2009 ▸; Lin et al., 2014 ▸).
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound with the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, two mol­ecules are associated through a pair of inter­molecular N—H⋯F hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), forming a centrosymmetric dimer with an (16) ring motif (Fig. 2 ▸). The dimers are further linked by C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸), forming a ribbon with a C(6) chain motif along the b-axis direction. The ribbons are linked by N—H⋯π and C—H⋯π inter­actions (Table 1 ▸), generating a three-dimensional network.
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the C5–C10 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N4—H4A⋯F2i 0.90 (3)2.46 (4)3.352 (3)169 (3)
C12—H12⋯N4ii 0.952.563.432 (4)152
N4—H4BCg1iii 0.88 (3)2.59 (4)3.315 (2)140 (3)
C9—H9⋯Cg1iv 0.952.733.480 (3)136

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Figure 2

A packing diagram of the title compound, viewed along the b axis. The N—H⋯F and C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and N—H⋯π and C—H⋯π inter­actions are shown as dashed lines.

Database survey

A search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39; May 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) gave 16 hits for 2-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en-1-yl)aza­benzene derivatives, and gave 18 and 45 hits for (E)-3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-enyl and 2-amino­phenyl-1-enyl fragments, respectively. Of these structures, those that resemble the title compound are 4-[2-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en-1-yl)phen­yl]morpholine (Lin et al., 2014 ▸), N-acetyl-N-{2-[(Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl]phen­yl}acetamide (Niu et al., 2009 ▸) and (E,E)-1,4-di­piperidino-2,5-bis­(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl)benzene (Shim­izu et al., 2009 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

The title compound was prepared by a modification of a reported procedure (Omote et al., 2013 ▸). In a glove box purged with argon gas, iodo­aniline (1.0 mmol), (2-methyl­all­yl)palladium(II) chloride dimer (0.1mmol), CuF2 (2.0 mmol) and 2,2′-bipyridyl (2.0 mmol) were placed in a flask. To the flask were added anhydrous DMF (6.0 ml) and (E)-trimethyl-(3,3,3-tri­fluoro­prop-1-en­yl)silane (2.0 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at 353 K. After the reaction mixture had been stirred for 4 h, it was poured into ice–water. The mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2, and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After the solid had been filtered off, the solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography to give the product in 68% yield. Colourless single crystals were obtained by recrystallization from an ethyl acetate–hexane (1:10, v/v) solution (m.p. 321–322 K). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 3.81 (2H, s), 6.13 (1H, qd, J = 15.9, 6.5 Hz), 6.72 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 0.9 Hz), 6.80 (1H, dt, J = 7.5, 0.9 Hz), 7.18 (1H, dt, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz), 7.24 (1H, qd, J = 15.9, 2.1 Hz), 7.29 (1H, dd, J = 7.8, 1.4 Hz). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ: 116.6 (q, J = 33.4 Hz), 116.8, 119.2, 119.4, 123.6 (q, J = 269.0 Hz), 127.9, 130.9, 133.3 (q, J = 6.8 Hz), 144.8. 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ: 12.07 (3F, dd, J = 6.5, 2.2 Hz). MS m/z 187 (M +), HRMS calculated for C9H8F3N 187.1617 (M +), found 187.0603.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. The amino H atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and refined freely. The C-bound H atoms were positioned geometrically (C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å) and refined using a riding model with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C). One outlier (11) was omitted in the last cycle of refinement.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC9H8F3N
M r 187.16
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)123
a, b, c (Å)7.3925 (4), 6.2777 (3), 18.6065 (9)
β (°)96.243 (7)
V3)858.37 (8)
Z 4
Radiation typeCu Kα
μ (mm−1)1.16
Crystal size (mm)0.40 × 0.26 × 0.08
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku R-AXIS RAPID
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)
T min, T max 0.543, 0.912
No. of measured, independent and observed [F 2 > 2.0σ(F 2)] reflections4753, 1566, 1178
R int 0.049
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.602
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.061, 0.175, 1.03
No. of reflections1566
No. of parameters126
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.49, −0.39

Computer programs: RAPID-AUTO (Rigaku, 2006 ▸), SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993 ▸), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸) and CrystalStructure (Rigaku, 2016 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756/is5499sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012756/is5499Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1866671 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C9H8F3NF(000) = 384.00
Mr = 187.16Dx = 1.448 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cCu Kα radiation, λ = 1.54187 Å
a = 7.3925 (4) ÅCell parameters from 4006 reflections
b = 6.2777 (3) Åθ = 4.8–68.2°
c = 18.6065 (9) ŵ = 1.16 mm1
β = 96.243 (7)°T = 123 K
V = 858.37 (8) Å3Platelet, colourless
Z = 40.40 × 0.26 × 0.08 mm
Rigaku R-AXIS RAPID diffractometer1178 reflections with F2 > 2.0σ(F2)
Detector resolution: 10.000 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.049
ω scansθmax = 68.2°, θmin = 4.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (ABSCOR; Higashi, 1995)h = −8→8
Tmin = 0.543, Tmax = 0.912k = −6→7
4753 measured reflectionsl = −22→22
1566 independent reflections
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.061Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.175H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1029P)2 + 0.1188P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1566 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
126 parametersΔρmax = 0.49 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.39 e Å3
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement was performed using all reflections. The weighted R-factor (wR) and goodness of fit (S) are based on F2. R-factor (gt) are based on F. The threshold expression of F2 > 2.0 sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factor (gt).
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.2762 (3)−0.0078 (3)0.52691 (8)0.0597 (7)
F20.3860 (2)−0.3171 (3)0.51696 (8)0.0569 (6)
F30.0979 (2)−0.2730 (4)0.50888 (9)0.0661 (7)
N40.3895 (3)0.4055 (4)0.31939 (13)0.0343 (6)
C50.3078 (3)0.2521 (4)0.27331 (13)0.0272 (6)
C60.2853 (3)0.2886 (4)0.19799 (12)0.0293 (6)
H60.32890.41710.17910.035*
C70.2009 (3)0.1398 (4)0.15202 (13)0.0311 (6)
H70.18630.16700.10150.037*
C80.1362 (4)−0.0502 (4)0.17775 (12)0.0311 (6)
H80.0788−0.15280.14530.037*
C90.1567 (3)−0.0871 (4)0.25119 (12)0.0276 (6)
H90.1123−0.21640.26910.033*
C100.2413 (3)0.0608 (4)0.30004 (11)0.0220 (6)
C110.2527 (3)0.0253 (4)0.37877 (12)0.0276 (6)
H110.26510.14750.40900.033*
C120.2471 (3)−0.1615 (4)0.41076 (12)0.0310 (6)
H120.2410−0.28560.38140.037*
C130.2497 (4)−0.1887 (4)0.48945 (13)0.0346 (7)
H4A0.448 (4)0.362 (6)0.3618 (18)0.070 (11)*
H4B0.448 (5)0.497 (5)0.2944 (18)0.067 (11)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.1045 (18)0.0494 (12)0.0245 (8)0.0050 (11)0.0032 (10)−0.0071 (8)
F20.0673 (13)0.0635 (13)0.0370 (10)0.0222 (10)−0.0073 (9)0.0154 (8)
F30.0571 (12)0.1073 (17)0.0329 (9)−0.0274 (11)−0.0002 (8)0.0251 (10)
N40.0379 (14)0.0297 (13)0.0346 (13)−0.0050 (11)0.0003 (11)−0.0022 (11)
C50.0267 (13)0.0255 (13)0.0292 (13)0.0036 (11)0.0021 (10)−0.0008 (11)
C60.0319 (14)0.0290 (14)0.0271 (13)0.0045 (12)0.0035 (10)0.0050 (11)
C70.0310 (14)0.0389 (16)0.0236 (12)0.0041 (12)0.0035 (10)0.0037 (11)
C80.0332 (15)0.0355 (15)0.0239 (13)−0.0023 (12)0.0000 (11)−0.0043 (11)
C90.0295 (13)0.0276 (14)0.0254 (12)0.0026 (12)0.0009 (10)0.0004 (11)
C100.0211 (13)0.0241 (13)0.0201 (11)0.0020 (10)−0.0010 (9)−0.0007 (10)
C110.0295 (15)0.0293 (14)0.0232 (12)0.0010 (11)−0.0008 (10)−0.0024 (10)
C120.0388 (15)0.0315 (15)0.0218 (12)0.0012 (12)−0.0008 (11)0.0002 (11)
C130.0400 (16)0.0373 (16)0.0254 (13)0.0004 (13)−0.0013 (11)0.0035 (11)
F1—C131.336 (3)C7—H70.9500
F2—C131.348 (3)C8—C91.378 (3)
F3—C131.326 (3)C8—H80.9500
N4—C51.383 (3)C9—C101.398 (3)
N4—H4A0.90 (3)C9—H90.9500
N4—H4B0.88 (3)C10—C111.475 (3)
C5—C101.409 (3)C11—C121.318 (3)
C5—C61.412 (3)C11—H110.9500
C6—C71.371 (3)C12—C131.472 (3)
C6—H60.9500C12—H120.9500
C7—C81.389 (4)
C5—N4—H4A118 (2)C10—C9—H9119.1
C5—N4—H4B109 (2)C9—C10—C5119.0 (2)
H4A—N4—H4B116 (3)C9—C10—C11121.2 (2)
N4—C5—C10121.3 (2)C5—C10—C11119.7 (2)
N4—C5—C6119.9 (2)C12—C11—C10125.6 (2)
C10—C5—C6118.7 (2)C12—C11—H11117.2
C7—C6—C5120.3 (2)C10—C11—H11117.2
C7—C6—H6119.8C11—C12—C13123.7 (2)
C5—C6—H6119.8C11—C12—H12118.1
C6—C7—C8121.4 (2)C13—C12—H12118.1
C6—C7—H7119.3F3—C13—F1106.1 (2)
C8—C7—H7119.3F3—C13—F2106.1 (2)
C9—C8—C7118.7 (2)F1—C13—F2104.4 (2)
C9—C8—H8120.6F3—C13—C12113.4 (2)
C7—C8—H8120.6F1—C13—C12113.9 (2)
C8—C9—C10121.8 (2)F2—C13—C12112.1 (2)
C8—C9—H9119.1
N4—C5—C6—C7−178.5 (2)N4—C5—C10—C112.2 (4)
C10—C5—C6—C7−0.3 (4)C6—C5—C10—C11−176.1 (2)
C5—C6—C7—C8−0.3 (4)C9—C10—C11—C1224.6 (4)
C6—C7—C8—C90.5 (4)C5—C10—C11—C12−158.9 (3)
C7—C8—C9—C10−0.3 (4)C10—C11—C12—C13−176.8 (2)
C8—C9—C10—C5−0.2 (4)C11—C12—C13—F3115.4 (3)
C8—C9—C10—C11176.3 (2)C11—C12—C13—F1−6.2 (4)
N4—C5—C10—C9178.7 (2)C11—C12—C13—F2−124.5 (3)
C6—C5—C10—C90.5 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4A···F2i0.90 (3)2.46 (4)3.352 (3)169 (3)
C12—H12···N4ii0.952.563.432 (4)152
N4—H4B···Cg1iii0.88 (3)2.59 (4)3.315 (2)140 (3)
C9—H9···Cg1iv0.952.733.480 (3)136
  10 in total

1.  Rhodamine-based chemodosimeter for fluorescent determination of Hg(2+) in 100% aqueous solution and in living cells.

Authors:  Dan Li; Chun-Yan Li; Yong-Fei Li; Zhi Li; Fen Xu
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Chemo-, regio-, and stereoselective trifluoromethylation of styrenes via visible light-driven single-electron transfer (SET) and triplet-triplet energy transfer (TTET) processes.

Authors:  Qing-Yu Lin; Xiu-Hua Xu; Feng-Ling Qing
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.354

3.  1,4-Bis(alkenyl)-2,5-dipiperidinobenzenes: minimal fluorophores exhibiting highly efficient emission in the solid state.

Authors:  Masaki Shimizu; Youhei Takeda; Masahiro Higashi; Tamejiro Hiyama
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Synthesis of 2-aryl-3-trifluoromethylquinolines using (E)-trimethyl(3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)silane.

Authors:  Masaaki Omote; Miyuu Tanaka; Miki Tanaka; Akari Ikeda; Atsushi Tarui; Kazuyuki Sato; Akira Ando
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 4.354

5.  N-Acetyl-N-{2-[(Z)-2-chloro-3,3,3-tri-fluoro-prop-1-en-yl]phen-yl}acetamide.

Authors:  Jia-Jia Niu; Zhi-Gang Li; Jing-Wei Xu
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-05-14

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Development of a fluorogenic small substrate for dipeptidyl peptidase-4.

Authors:  Futa Ogawa; Masanori Takeda; Kanae Miyanaga; Keita Tani; Ryuji Yamazawa; Kiyoshi Ito; Atsushi Tarui; Kazuyuki Sato; Masaaki Omote
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.883

8.  An Endoperoxide Reactivity-Based FRET Probe for Ratiometric Fluorescence Imaging of Labile Iron Pools in Living Cells.

Authors:  Allegra T Aron; Morten O Loehr; Jana Bogena; Christopher J Chang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.