Literature DB >> 30319793

Crystal structure of 3,6-dihy-droxy-4,5-di-methyl-benzene-1,2-dicarbaldehyde.

Shu Yamazaki1, Kazuki Nishiyama1, Shiomi Yagi1, Tomoyuki Haraguchi1, Takashiro Akitsu1.   

Abstract

The title compound, C10H10O4, was synthesized from tetra-methyl-1,4-benzo-quinone. In the crystal, the almost planar mol-ecule (r.m.s. deviation = 0.024 Å) forms intra-molecular hydrogen bonds between the aldehyde and hy-droxy groups and exhibits C 2v symmetry. This achiral mol-ecule crystallizes in the chiral space group P21 with inter-molecular O-H⋯O and C-H⋯O hydrogen bonding and C-H⋯π and C=O⋯π inter-actions stabilizing the crystal packing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alkyl­ating agents; chiral crystallization; crystal structure

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319793      PMCID: PMC6176455          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

A number of benzo- and naphtho­quinone derivatives with one or two side chains being capable of alkyl­ation after reduction were found to exhibit inhibitory activity against the growth of transplantable tumours in mice. Furthermore, inhibition of nucleic acid biosynthesis and of the activities of coenzyme Q mediated enzyme systems are also known for related compounds composed of 3,6-dihy­droxy-4,5-di­methyl­benzene-1,2-dicarbaldehyde (Lin & Loo, 1977 ▸; Lin et al., 1978 ▸). According to the literature, these compounds are synthesized from tetra­methyl-1,4-benzo­quinone (Lin & Loo, 1977 ▸; Lin et al., 1978 ▸). Here we report the mol­ecular and crystal structure of an achiral derviative crystallizing in a chiral space group.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound consists of a benzene ring substituted by two methyl groups, two hy­droxy groups and two aldehyde groups (Fig. 1 ▸). The mol­ecular point group symmetry is C 2v (H atoms excluded). The CC bond lengths of the methyl substituents are 1.511 (2) and 1.508 (2) Å, the C—O bond lengths of the hy­droxy substituents are 1.354 (2) and 1.350 (2) Å, and the CC bond lengths of the aldehyde substituents are 1.464 (2) and 1.462 (2) Å. Two intra­molecular O—H⋯H hydrogen bonds between the hy­droxy and aldehyde functions are observed (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 1 ▸). The mol­ecule is essentially planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.024 Å), with the largest deviation found for atom O2 [0.047 (1) Å].
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound, showing the atom-numbering scheme and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of ring C1–C6.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O3—H3⋯O20.841.872.6079 (19)146
O4—H4⋯O10.841.822.5592 (19)146
O3—H3⋯O4i 0.842.403.036 (2)133
O4—H4⋯O2ii 0.842.342.809 (2)116
C7—H7⋯O2iii 0.952.513.427 (2)162
C10—H10BCg1iv 0.983.133.645114

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, mol­ecules are connected along the b axis by O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and along the c axis by C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 2 ▸). As a result, chiral crystals composed of achiral mol­ecules are formed. Many examples of such chiral crystals forming from achiral mol­ecules have been reported for decades, but the prediction of chiral crystallization is still impossible (Koshima & Matsuura, 1998 ▸; Matsuura & Koshima, 2005 ▸).
Figure 2

A view of the O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) present in the crystal lattice of the title compound.

The C8=O2 carbonyl group is stacked on top of the aromatic ring, with the O2⋯Cg1 distance being 3.4846 (19) Å (Cg1 is the centroid of ring C1–C6). In addition, a weak C—H⋯π inter­action C10—H10B⋯Cg1 (3.131 Å) is also found (Table 1 ▸ and Fig. 3 ▸).
Figure 3

Part of the crystal packing showing the C—H⋯π stacking inter­actions.

Database survey

A search in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD, Version 5.39, update May 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) for similar 1,2-dicarbaldehyde structures returned five relevant entries: benzene-1,2-dicarbaldehyde [IHEMAJ (Britton, 2002 ▸) and IHEMAJ01 (Mendenhall et al., 2003 ▸)], naphthalene-1,2-dicarbaldehyde (FIYQOT; Britton, 1999 ▸), a chromene-5,6-dicarbaldehyde derivative (IDUCUH; am Ende et al., 2013 ▸) and a cobalt benzene-1,2-dicarbaldehyde complex (JUKZAQ; Lenges et al., 1999 ▸). In the first four structures, the aldehyde functions show C—H⋯O inter­actions (H⋯O distances from 2.226 to 2.360 Å). This is not the case for the cobalt complex JUKZAQ, where the two aldehyde O atoms are facing each other and complexed with cobalt, nor with the title compound where the two aldehyde O atoms are involved in intra­molecular hydrogen bonds and the two aldehyde H atoms are facing each other. The intra­molecular O—H⋯O inter­action between the 1-carbaldehyde and 2-hy­droxy groups is also observed in compounds such as 1,8-dihy­droxy-2-naphthaldehyde (BABXUA; Peng et al., 2015 ▸) and 2,4,6-tri­hydroxy­benzene-1,3,5-tricarbaldehyde (WEPPUE; von Richthofen et al., 2013 ▸).

Synthesis and crystallization

A mixture of tetra­methyl-1,4-benzo­quinone (2.0406 g, 12.4 mmol) and concentrated piperidine (98.0%, 35 ml) was stirred at room temperature for 35 h. The mixture was evaporated and a white inter­mediate product was obtained. To a solution of the obtained inter­mediate product dissolved in acetic acid (18 ml), a mixture of CrO3 (1.77 g) and 50% acetic acid (35 ml) was added dropwise at 353 K. After 10 min, the reaction mixture was poured onto crushed ice (100 g). The solution was filtered by vacuum filtration and a crude compound was obtained. The crude compound was dissolved in toluene and purified by silica column chromatography to afford 0.567 g (yield 23.5%) of the title compound as a yellow solid (single crystals served for X-ray analysis). IR (KBr, cm−1): 1633 (s), 3436 (m).

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All H atoms were located in difference Fourier maps. C-bound H atoms were constrained using a riding model [C—H = 0.98 Å and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(C) for methyl H atoms, and C—H = 0.95 Å and U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C) for the aldehyde H atoms]. O-bound H atoms were constrained using a riding model [O—H = 0.84 Å and U iso(H) = 1.5U eq(O) for hy­droxy H atoms].
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC10H10O4
M r 194.18
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21
Temperature (K)100
a, b, c (Å)5.251 (2), 6.317 (2), 12.999 (5)
β (°)91.643 (4)
V3)431.0 (3)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.12
Crystal size (mm)0.38 × 0.30 × 0.13
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)
T min, T max 0.785, 0.785
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections2328, 1228, 1207
R int 0.014
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.650
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.029, 0.082, 1.06
No. of reflections1228
No. of parameters131
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.25, −0.22
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 179 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.5 (6)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸), SHELXT2014 (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸), SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), WinGX (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), Mercury (Macrae et al., 2006 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012495/vm2211sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012495/vm2211Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018012495/vm2211Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1865811 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C10H10O4F(000) = 204
Mr = 194.18Dx = 1.496 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.251 (2) ÅCell parameters from 2083 reflections
b = 6.317 (2) Åθ = 3.1–27.5°
c = 12.999 (5) ŵ = 0.12 mm1
β = 91.643 (4)°T = 100 K
V = 431.0 (3) Å3Prism, yellow
Z = 20.38 × 0.30 × 0.13 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1228 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1207 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 8.3333 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.014
φ and ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 1.6°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2001)h = −6→6
Tmin = 0.785, Tmax = 0.785k = −3→8
2328 measured reflectionsl = −16→16
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0523P)2 + 0.0966P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.082(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 1.06Δρmax = 0.25 e Å3
1228 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.22 e Å3
131 parametersAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 179 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
1 restraintAbsolute structure parameter: 0.5 (6)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O40.7944 (2)0.8239 (2)0.27690 (9)0.0183 (3)
H40.73570.89980.32370.027*
O2−0.0040 (2)0.1772 (2)0.38214 (9)0.0193 (3)
O10.5175 (2)0.9141 (2)0.42970 (9)0.0190 (3)
O30.2530 (2)0.0865 (2)0.21917 (9)0.0174 (3)
H30.14180.06890.26350.026*
C30.5775 (3)0.3220 (3)0.17026 (11)0.0136 (3)
C80.1144 (3)0.3446 (3)0.38843 (12)0.0150 (4)
H80.07170.44080.44140.018*
C40.7113 (3)0.5092 (3)0.18410 (12)0.0133 (3)
C10.3173 (3)0.4049 (3)0.31924 (12)0.0128 (3)
C20.3797 (3)0.2696 (3)0.23855 (12)0.0129 (3)
C70.3981 (3)0.7489 (3)0.41517 (12)0.0153 (4)
H70.26190.71740.45920.018*
C50.6521 (3)0.6468 (3)0.26629 (12)0.0134 (4)
C60.4550 (3)0.5985 (3)0.33345 (12)0.0125 (3)
C90.6387 (3)0.1702 (3)0.08493 (12)0.0177 (4)
H9A0.62590.24410.01870.027*
H9B0.51770.05210.08480.027*
H9C0.81220.11590.09580.027*
C100.9192 (3)0.5739 (3)0.11251 (13)0.0179 (4)
H10A1.01380.44820.09150.027*
H10B1.03560.67260.14810.027*
H10C0.84310.64290.05150.027*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O40.0187 (6)0.0167 (7)0.0198 (6)−0.0064 (6)0.0074 (5)−0.0031 (5)
O20.0174 (5)0.0194 (6)0.0214 (6)−0.0060 (6)0.0049 (4)−0.0018 (5)
O10.0228 (6)0.0164 (6)0.0180 (5)−0.0036 (6)0.0033 (5)−0.0035 (5)
O30.0179 (5)0.0158 (6)0.0186 (6)−0.0052 (6)0.0051 (4)−0.0035 (5)
C30.0127 (7)0.0166 (8)0.0117 (7)0.0021 (7)0.0015 (6)−0.0001 (7)
C80.0130 (7)0.0172 (9)0.0148 (7)−0.0010 (7)0.0022 (6)0.0000 (7)
C40.0108 (6)0.0163 (8)0.0130 (7)0.0007 (6)0.0024 (5)0.0020 (7)
C10.0109 (6)0.0151 (8)0.0123 (6)0.0000 (7)0.0009 (5)0.0007 (7)
C20.0115 (6)0.0128 (9)0.0144 (7)−0.0017 (6)0.0000 (6)0.0010 (6)
C70.0162 (7)0.0154 (8)0.0142 (7)0.0003 (7)0.0018 (6)0.0012 (7)
C50.0114 (6)0.0151 (9)0.0137 (7)−0.0014 (7)0.0001 (5)0.0011 (7)
C60.0115 (6)0.0139 (8)0.0120 (7)0.0001 (6)0.0011 (5)0.0011 (7)
C90.0185 (7)0.0192 (9)0.0157 (7)0.0000 (7)0.0034 (6)−0.0048 (7)
C100.0146 (7)0.0227 (9)0.0166 (7)−0.0003 (7)0.0062 (6)0.0012 (7)
O4—C51.350 (2)C4—C101.511 (2)
O4—H40.84C1—C21.399 (2)
O2—C81.228 (2)C1—C61.431 (2)
O1—C71.229 (2)C7—C61.462 (2)
O3—C21.354 (2)C7—H70.95
O3—H30.84C5—C61.406 (2)
C3—C41.385 (3)C9—H9A0.98
C3—C21.424 (2)C9—H9B0.98
C3—C91.508 (2)C9—H9C0.98
C8—C11.464 (2)C10—H10A0.98
C8—H80.95C10—H10B0.98
C4—C51.419 (2)C10—H10C0.98
C5—O4—H4109.5C6—C7—H7118.4
C2—O3—H3109.5O4—C5—C6122.08 (14)
C4—C3—C2119.60 (14)O4—C5—C4116.85 (13)
C4—C3—C9121.36 (14)C6—C5—C4121.06 (16)
C2—C3—C9119.04 (16)C5—C6—C1118.92 (14)
O2—C8—C1123.97 (16)C5—C6—C7118.66 (16)
O2—C8—H8118.0C1—C6—C7122.42 (13)
C1—C8—H8118.0C3—C9—H9A109.5
C3—C4—C5119.97 (14)C3—C9—H9B109.5
C3—C4—C10121.60 (15)H9A—C9—H9B109.5
C5—C4—C10118.43 (17)C3—C9—H9C109.5
C2—C1—C6119.38 (13)H9A—C9—H9C109.5
C2—C1—C8119.46 (16)H9B—C9—H9C109.5
C6—C1—C8121.15 (15)C4—C10—H10A109.5
O3—C2—C1122.45 (14)C4—C10—H10B109.5
O3—C2—C3116.47 (14)H10A—C10—H10B109.5
C1—C2—C3121.05 (16)C4—C10—H10C109.5
O1—C7—C6123.30 (15)H10A—C10—H10C109.5
O1—C7—H7118.4H10B—C10—H10C109.5
C2—C3—C4—C50.4 (2)C3—C4—C5—O4178.32 (14)
C9—C3—C4—C5−178.85 (15)C10—C4—C5—O4−2.5 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C10−178.81 (15)C3—C4—C5—C6−1.3 (2)
C9—C3—C4—C102.0 (2)C10—C4—C5—C6177.94 (14)
O2—C8—C1—C21.9 (2)O4—C5—C6—C1−178.18 (14)
O2—C8—C1—C6−177.34 (15)C4—C5—C6—C11.4 (2)
C6—C1—C2—O3−178.32 (13)O4—C5—C6—C72.0 (2)
C8—C1—C2—O32.5 (2)C4—C5—C6—C7−178.41 (15)
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.2 (2)C2—C1—C6—C5−0.6 (2)
C8—C1—C2—C3−179.44 (14)C8—C1—C6—C5178.56 (15)
C4—C3—C2—O3178.56 (14)C2—C1—C6—C7179.16 (16)
C9—C3—C2—O3−2.2 (2)C8—C1—C6—C7−1.6 (2)
C4—C3—C2—C10.4 (2)O1—C7—C6—C5−1.6 (2)
C9—C3—C2—C1179.61 (14)O1—C7—C6—C1178.61 (14)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O3—H3···O20.841.872.6079 (19)146
O4—H4···O10.841.822.5592 (19)146
O3—H3···O4i0.842.403.036 (2)133
O4—H4···O2ii0.842.342.809 (2)116
C7—H7···O2iii0.952.513.427 (2)162
C10—H10···Cg1iv0.983.133.645114
  9 in total

1.  O- and m-Benzenedicarbaldehyde.

Authors:  Doyle Britton
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C       Date:  2002-10-11       Impact factor: 1.172

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Optically Triggered Stepwise Double-Proton Transfer in an Intramolecular Proton Relay: A Case Study of 1,8-Dihydroxy-2-naphthaldehyde.

Authors:  Chia-Yu Peng; Jiun-Yi Shen; Yi-Ting Chen; Pei-Jhen Wu; Wen-Yi Hung; Wei-Ping Hu; Pi-Tai Chou
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Total synthesis of (±)-bisabosqual A.

Authors:  Christopher W am Ende; Zhou Zhou; Kathlyn A Parker
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Structure and Reactivity of a Cobalt(I) Phthalaldehyde Complex with Both σ- and π-Bonded Aldehyde Groups.

Authors:  Christian P Lenges; Maurice Brookhart; Peter S White
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Success or Failure of Chiral Crystallization of Similar Heterocyclic Compounds.

Authors:  Cyprian M Chunkang; Iris E Ikome; Emmanuel N Nfor; Yuta Mitani; Natsuki Katsuumi; Tomoyuki Haraguchi; Takashiro Akitsu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.