Literature DB >> 30319031

Imitation in a Second Language Relies on Phonological Categories but Does Not Reflect the Productive Usage of Difficult Sound Contrasts.

Miquel Llompart1, Eva Reinisch1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between imitation and both the perception and production abilities of second language (L2) learners for two non-native contrasts differing in their expected degree of difficulty. German learners of English were tested on perceptual categorization, imitation and a word reading task for the difficult English /ɛ/-/æ/ contrast, which tends not to be well encoded in the learners' phonological inventories, and the easy, near-native /i/-/ɪ/ contrast. As expected, within-task comparisons between contrasts revealed more robust perception and better differentiation during production for /i/-/ɪ/ than /ɛ/-/æ/. Imitation also followed this pattern, suggesting that imitation is modulated by the phonological encoding of L2 categories. Moreover, learners' ability to imitate /ɛ/ and /æ/ was related to their perception of that contrast, confirming a tight perception-production link at the phonological level for difficult L2 sound contrasts. However, no relationship was observed between acoustic measures for imitated and read-aloud tokens of /ɛ/ and /æ/. This dissociation is mostly attributed to the influence of inaccurate non-native lexical representations in the word reading task. We conclude that imitation is strongly related to the phonological representation of L2 sound contrasts, but does not need to reflect the learners' productive usage of such non-native distinctions.

Keywords:  Second language learning; imitation; perception-production link; speech perception; speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30319031     DOI: 10.1177/0023830918803978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  2 in total

1.  My English sounds better than yours: Second-language learners perceive their own accent as better than that of their peers.

Authors:  Holger Mitterer; Nikola Anna Eger; Eva Reinisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Variability in L2 Vowel Production: Different Elicitation Methods Affect Individual Speakers Differently.

Authors:  Murray J Munro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.