Margherita Nosadini1, Shekeeb S Mohammad2, Irene Toldo3, Stefano Sartori4, Russell C Dale5. 1. Neuroimmunology Group, Institute for Neuroscience and Muscle Research, Kids Research Institute at the Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Australia; Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Italy. Electronic address: margherita.nosadini@gmail.com. 2. Neuroimmunology Group, Institute for Neuroscience and Muscle Research, Kids Research Institute at the Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: shekeeb.mohammad@health.nsw.gov.au. 3. Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Italy. Electronic address: irene.toldo@unipd.it. 4. Paediatric Neurology and Neurophysiology Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University Hospital of Padua, Italy. Electronic address: stefano.sartori@unipd.it. 5. Neuroimmunology Group, Institute for Neuroscience and Muscle Research, Kids Research Institute at the Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: russell.dale@health.nsw.gov.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Available data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) for paediatric-onset anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE) is limited. METHODS: Systematic literature review on patients treated with MMF/AZA/MTX for paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE, with focus on modes of use, efficacy and safety. RESULTS: 87 patients were included (age at onset median 11 years, range 0.8-18 years; 69% females). 46% had a relapsing course. 52% received MMF, 27% AZA, 15% MTX, and 6% a combination of MMF/AZA/MTX (7 patients received intrathecal MTX). Before MMF/AZA/MTX, 100% patients received steroids, 83% intravenous immunoglobulin and 45% plasma exchange, and 50% received second-line treatments (rituximab/cyclophosphamide). MMF/AZA/MTX were administered >6 months from onset in 51%, and only after relapse in 40%. Worst mRS before MMF/AZA/MTX was median 4.5 (range 3-5). At last follow-up (median 2 years, range 0.2-8.6), median mRS was 1 (range 0-6). Median annualised relapse rate was 0.4 (range 0-6.7) pre-MMF/AZA/MTX (excluding first events), and 0 on MMF/AZA/MTX (mean 0.03, range 0-0.8). 7% patients relapsed on MMF/AZA/MTX. These relapsing patients had low rate of second-line treatments before MMF/AZA/MTX (25%), long median time between onset and MMF/AZA/MTX usage (18 months), and frequently they were started on MMF/AZA/MTX only after relapse (75%). Relapse rate was lower among patients who received first immune therapy ≤30 days (25%) than later (64%), who received second-line treatments at first event (14%) rather than not (64%), who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX after the first (12%) rather than subsequent events (17%), and who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX ≤3 months from onset (33%) rather than later (53%). Adverse reactions to MMF/AZA/MTX occurred in 2 cases (cytomegalovirus colitis and respiratory infection), of grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. DISCUSSION: Our literature review disclosed heterogeneity in the use of MMF/AZA/MTX in paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE. MMF/AZA/MTX usage is mostly restricted to retrospective cohort descriptions. These agents may reduce risk of relapse, and have a reasonable safety profile, however data on larger cohorts are required to definitively determine effect.
BACKGROUND: Available data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) for paediatric-onset anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE) is limited. METHODS: Systematic literature review on patients treated with MMF/AZA/MTX for paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE, with focus on modes of use, efficacy and safety. RESULTS: 87 patients were included (age at onset median 11 years, range 0.8-18 years; 69% females). 46% had a relapsing course. 52% received MMF, 27% AZA, 15% MTX, and 6% a combination of MMF/AZA/MTX (7 patients received intrathecal MTX). Before MMF/AZA/MTX, 100% patients received steroids, 83% intravenous immunoglobulin and 45% plasma exchange, and 50% received second-line treatments (rituximab/cyclophosphamide). MMF/AZA/MTX were administered >6 months from onset in 51%, and only after relapse in 40%. Worst mRS before MMF/AZA/MTX was median 4.5 (range 3-5). At last follow-up (median 2 years, range 0.2-8.6), median mRS was 1 (range 0-6). Median annualised relapse rate was 0.4 (range 0-6.7) pre-MMF/AZA/MTX (excluding first events), and 0 on MMF/AZA/MTX (mean 0.03, range 0-0.8). 7% patients relapsed on MMF/AZA/MTX. These relapsing patients had low rate of second-line treatments before MMF/AZA/MTX (25%), long median time between onset and MMF/AZA/MTX usage (18 months), and frequently they were started on MMF/AZA/MTX only after relapse (75%). Relapse rate was lower among patients who received first immune therapy ≤30 days (25%) than later (64%), who received second-line treatments at first event (14%) rather than not (64%), who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX after the first (12%) rather than subsequent events (17%), and who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX ≤3 months from onset (33%) rather than later (53%). Adverse reactions to MMF/AZA/MTX occurred in 2 cases (cytomegalovirus colitis and respiratory infection), of grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. DISCUSSION: Our literature review disclosed heterogeneity in the use of MMF/AZA/MTX in paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE. MMF/AZA/MTX usage is mostly restricted to retrospective cohort descriptions. These agents may reduce risk of relapse, and have a reasonable safety profile, however data on larger cohorts are required to definitively determine effect.