Literature DB >> 3031755

[Magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) of the orbit].

T Krahe, J Gieseke, M Herter, H G Trier, H H Wolf, K Lackner.   

Abstract

By using high field strengths and surface coils, MRT achieves a resolution comparable with CT in the orbita. The advantages of MRT are good contrast resolution and imaging in several planes. Twenty-six patients have been examined by MRT, which has shown high sensitivity and good detail for the demonstration of pathological changes. In spite of this, MRT at present is not a realistic alternative to ultrasound and CT, because it is unable to demonstrate bone and calcification; its specificity is low, but the time and cost of the examination is high. It is indicated only for problems involving the optic nerve and chiasma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3031755     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1048481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  2 in total

1.  Proteomic studies of bone and skeletal health outcomes.

Authors:  Carrie M Nielson; Jon M Jacobs; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Shortcomings and pitfalls of ocular MRI.

Authors:  G Wilms; G Marchal; L Van Fraeyenhoven; P Demaerel; P Van Hecke; A L Baert; G Dralands
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.