Literature DB >> 30317547

Concordance with NCCN treatment guidelines: Relations with health care utilization, cost, and mortality in breast cancer patients with secondary metastasis.

Gabrielle B Rocque1,2, Courtney P Williams2, Kelly M Kenzik1,2,3, Bradford E Jackson4, Andres Azuero5, Karina I Halilova2, Stacey A Ingram2, Maria Pisu1,6, Andres Forero1,2, Smita Bhatia1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guideline concordance on costs, health care utilization, and mortality for patients with breast cancer and secondary metastases is unknown.
METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, women with early-stage breast cancer who received treatment for secondary metastases (n = 5651) were evaluated for first recorded systemic therapy concordance with NCCN guidelines within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare linked database. Generalized linear and mixed effects models evaluated factors associated with nonconcordance and the relation between concordance status and health care utilization and costs. Mortality risk was estimated with Cox regression.
RESULTS: Eighteen percent of the patients received nonconcordant therapy, with the most common being single-agent, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy (36%), therapy mismatched with the estrogen receptor/HER2 status (11%), unapproved bevacizumab regimens (10%), and adjuvant regimens in a metastatic setting (6%). A younger age, a hormone receptor-negative status, and a HER2-positive status were associated with nonconcordance (P < .05). Nonconcordance was associated with 22% and 21% increased rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, respectively, and $1765 higher average monthly Medicare costs. Differences in adjusted mortality risk were noted by the category of nonconcordance; single-agent, HER2-targeted therapy was associated with decreased mortality risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% confidence limit [CL], 0.57-0.76), and increased mortality risk was observed with unapproved bevacizumab use (HR, 1.40; 95% CL, 1.13-1.74).
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients (82%) received treatment consistent with NCCN guidelines. Nonconcordant treatment was associated with higher health care utilization and costs, with mortality differences observed by the type of guideline deviation. Consideration of both patient and financial outcomes will be important as health systems increase the emphasis on guideline-based care.
© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare costs; breast cancer; guidelines; health care utilization; older adults

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30317547     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

1.  Clinical Molecular Marker Testing Data Capture to Promote Precision Medicine Research Within the Cancer Research Network.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Natalia Udaltsova; Lawrence H Kushi; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Pamala A Pawloski; Douglas A Corley; Sarah Knerr; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Jessica Ezzell Hunter; David C Tabano; Mara M Epstein; Stacey A Honda; Monica Ter-Minassian; Julie A Lynch; Christine Y Lu
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-09

2.  Bridging the Data-Free Zone: Decision Making for Older Adults With Cancer.

Authors:  Gabrielle B Rocque; Grant R Williams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A comparative study using time-driven activity-based costing in single-fraction breast high-dose rate brachytherapy: An integrated brachytherapy suite vs. decentralized workflow.

Authors:  Gabriella C Squeo; Courtney M Lattimore; Nicole L Simone; Greg Suralik; Sunil W Dutta; Michael D Schad; Lucy Su; Bruce Libby; Einsley-Marie Janowski; Shayna L Showalter; Jennifer M Lobo; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.441

4.  Development and proof-of-concept of a multicenter, patient-centered cancer registry for breast cancer patients with metastatic disease-the "Breast cancer care for patients with metastatic disease" (BRE-4-MED) registry.

Authors:  Stephanie Stangl; Kirsten Haas; Felizitas A Eichner; Anna Grau; Udo Selig; Timo Ludwig; Tanja Fehm; Tanja Stüber; Asarnusch Rashid; Alexander Kerscher; Ralf Bargou; Silke Hermann; Volker Arndt; Martin Meyer; Manfred Wildner; Hermann Faller; Michael G Schrauder; Michael Weigel; Ulrich Schlembach; Peter U Heuschmann; Achim Wöckel
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2020-02-04

5.  Prior Treatment Time Affects Survival Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gabrielle B Rocque; Aidan Gilbert; Courtney P Williams; Kelly M Kenzik; Arie Nakhmani; Pravinkumar G Kandhare; Smita Bhatia; Mark E Burkard; Andres Azuero
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-06

6.  Levels of Evidence for Radiation Therapy Recommendations in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Guidelines.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Noy; Benjamin J Rich; Ricardo Llorente; Deukwoo Kwon; Matthew Abramowitz; Brandon Mahal; Eric A Mellon; Nicholas G Zaorsky; Alan Dal Pra
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29

7.  Association of guideline-concordant initial systemic treatment with clinical and economic outcomes among older women with metastatic breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Tyler Mantaian; Shweta Kamat; Sobha Kurian; Stephen Kogut
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.929

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.