Literature DB >> 30316878

Impact of human papillomavirus vaccination on the clinical meaning of cervical screening results.

Philip E Castle1, Xianhong Xie2, Xiaonan Xue2, Nancy E Poitras3, Thomas S Lorey3, Walter K Kinney3, Nicolas Wentzensen4, Howard D Strickler2, Emily A Burger5, Mark Schiffman4.   

Abstract

Women previously vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 18 are now reaching the age (21 years) at which cervical-cancer screening is recommended in the U.S. The impact of HPV vaccination on risks of cervical precancer following a positive and negative screen among women aged 21-24 years who just started routine cervical screening are not well described. Therefore, three-year absolute and relative (RR) cumulative risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe diagnoses (≥CIN2) and grade 3 or more severe diagnoses (≥CIN3) were estimated for women undergoing cervical screening at Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Risks were estimated in women aged 21-24 years (n = 75,008) undergoing cervical screening since late 2006, 6 months after HPV vaccination became available; women were categorized vaccinated at ages <18, 18-20, and 21-24 years and compared to those who were unvaccinated. Three-year risks were estimated for normal, low-grade, and high-grade cytology results. Three-year risks of ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 for unvaccinated women following low-grade cytology were 10.89% for and 3.70%, respectively. By comparison, Three-year risks of ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 were 5.26% (RR = 0.48, 95%CI = 0.24-0.99) and 0.99% (RR = 0.27, 95%CI = 0.06-1.13), respectively, for women vaccinated under the age of 18 years. Three-year ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 risks were lower for those HPV vaccinated at younger age for any screening result (ptrend ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons). These data support initiating cervical screening at an older age or changing the management of a low-grade cytology result in women aged 21-24 years who were vaccinated against HPV younger than age of 18 years.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical precancer; Cytology; Human papillomavirus (HPV); Screening; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30316878     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  9 in total

Review 1.  Screening for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Terresa J Eun; Rebecca B Perkins
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.456

2.  Performance of Cervical Screening a Decade Following HPV Vaccination: The Costa Rica Vaccine Trial.

Authors:  Shang-Ying Hu; Aimée R Kreimer; Carolina Porras; Diego Guillén; Mario Alfaro; Teresa M Darragh; Mark H Stoler; Luis F Villegas; Rebecca Ocampo; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Mark Schiffman; Sabrina H Tsang; Douglas R Lowy; John T Schiller; John Schussler; Wim Quint; Mitchell H Gail; Joshua N Sampson; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Contribution of Etiologic Cofactors to CIN3+ Risk Among Women With Human Papillomavirus-Positive Screening Test Results.

Authors:  Maria Demarco; Didem Egemen; Noorie Hyun; Xiaojian Chen; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Li Cheung; Olivia Carter-Pokras; Anne Hammer; Julia C Gage; Megan A Clarke; Philip E Castle; Brian Befano; Jie Chen; Cher Dallal; Xin He; Kanan Desai; Thomas Lorey; Nancy Poitras; Tina R Raine-Bennett; Rebecca B Perkins; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.842

4.  A case study and proposal for publishing directed acyclic graphs: The effectiveness of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in perinatally HIV Infected girls.

Authors:  Ruby Barnard-Mayers; Hiba Kouser; Jamie A Cohen; Katherine Tassiopoulos; Ellen C Caniglia; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Nicole G Campos; Michelle R Caunca; George R Seage Seage; Eleanor J Murray
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 7.407

5.  Test Performance of Cervical Cytology Among Adults With vs Without Human Papillomavirus Vaccination.

Authors:  Deanna Teoh; Gwiwon Nam; Danielle A Aase; Ruby Russell; Genevieve B Melton; Shalini Kulasingam; Rachel I Vogel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-05-02

6.  Assessing Physician Adherence to Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening and Management of Abnormal Screening Results.

Authors:  Caroline J Min; L Stewart Massad; Rebecca Dick; Matthew A Powell; Lindsay M Kuroki
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 7.  Defining benchmarks for tolerable risk thresholds in cancer screening: Impact of HPV vaccination on the future of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; Sandra D Isidean; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 7.316

8.  Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Effectiveness after 12 Years in Madrid (Spain).

Authors:  Juan J Hernandez-Aguado; Damián Ángel Sánchez Torres; Esther Martínez Lamela; Gema Aguión Gálvez; Eva Sanz Espinosa; Almudena Pérez Quintanilla; Daniela A Martínez-Carrillo; Mar Ramírez Mena; Pluvio J Coronado Martín; Ignacio Zapardiel; Jesús de la Fuente-Valero
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03

9.  2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines: Methods for Risk Estimation, Recommended Management, and Validation.

Authors:  Li C Cheung; Didem Egemen; Xiaojian Chen; Hormuzd A Katki; Maria Demarco; Amy L Wiser; Rebecca B Perkins; Richard S Guido; Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark Schiffman
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.842

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.