Literature DB >> 30316829

Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: can we approach a 0% rate using the largest staple height with reinforcement all along the staple line? Short-term results and technical considerations.

Tarek Debs1, Niccolo Petrucciani2, Radwan Kassir3, Eric Sejor3, Sami Karam3, Imed Ben Amor3, Jean Gugenheim3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is gaining acceptance among bariatric surgeons as a viable option for treating morbidly obese patients. We describe the results of a single center's experience with SG, revealing a low complication rate.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze the short-term results of laparoscopic SG using exclusively black staples with staple-line reinforcement. SETTINGS: University hospital, tertiary referral center for bariatric surgery.
METHODS: SG was performed in 434 consecutive patients from December 2014 to March 2017. A technique is described where all operations were performed with attention to avoiding strictures at the incisura angularis and not stapling near the esophagus at the angle of His. All the interventions were performed using black cartridges and staple-line reinforcement using bioabsorbable Seamguard. A prospective chart review was conducted to determine the occurrence of early complications.
RESULTS: Follow-up data were collected for all patients at 90 days postoperatively. A total complication rate of 4.4% was observed. No leaks occurred in any of the patients. One case of bleeding occurred that necessitated a surgical exploration, which found the origin of the bleeding to be a diaphragmatic vessel. The 90-day mortality rate was 0%.
CONCLUSION: SG can be performed with a low complication rate. Selection of the appropriate staple height and reinforcement of the staple line could play a major role in optimizing the results of SG.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Black cartridges; Complications; Mechanical stapling devices; Seamguard; Sleeve gastrectomy; Staple-line reinforcement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30316829     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  5 in total

1.  Battle of the buttress: 5-year propensity-matched analysis of staple-line reinforcement techniques from the MBSAQIP database.

Authors:  Mohamed A Aboueisha; Meredith Freeman; Jonathan K Allotey; Leah Evans; Michael Z Caposole; Danielle Tatum; Shauna Levy; John W Baker; Carlos Galvani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.453

2.  Is staple line reinforcement still needed on contemporary staplers? A benchtop analysis.

Authors:  Bipan Chand; Christen Meyers
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Postoperative bleeding and leaks in sleeve gastrectomy are independent of both staple height and staple line oversewing.

Authors:  Aman B Ali; Lee M Morris; Jeffrey Hodges; Farshad Amirkhosravi; Sara Yasrebi; Amelia Khoo; Edward A Graviss; Duc T Nguyen; Patrick R Reardon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.453

4.  Efficacy and Drawbacks of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Center.

Authors:  Arnaud Liagre; Francesco Martini; Yves Anduze; Hubert Boudrie; Olivier Van Haverbeke; Stefano Valabrega; Radwan Kassir; Tarek Debs; Niccolò Petrucciani
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Abdominal Pain After Subtotal Gastrectomy: A First Report of Accessory Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Jia-Yu Zhang; Jia Huang; Zhi-Ying Yang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 3.133

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.