Literature DB >> 30316417

Pros and cons of robotic microsurgery as an appropriate approach to male reproductive surgery for vasectomy reversal and varicocele repair.

Peter Chan1, Sijo J Parekattil2, Marc Goldstein3, Larry I Lipshultz4, Parviz Kavoussi5, Andrew McCullough6, Mark Sigman7.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30316417     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

Review 1.  Narrative review of the history of microsurgery in urological practice.

Authors:  Mang L Chen; Gregory M Buncke; Paul J Turek
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-04

2.  3D digital image microscope system-assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy in rats.

Authors:  Peng Li; Na-Chuan Liu; Er-Lei Zhi; Chen-Cheng Yao; Zhi-Liang Zhao; Zhi-Yong Yu; Qi-Meng Li; Yu-Hua Huang; Jie-Chang Ju; Wen-Bin Huang; Husanjan Rozi; Zhi-Yong Ji; San-Wei Guo; Ru-Hui Tian; Zheng Li
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.