Literature DB >> 30316055

Apophenia, unconscious bias and reflexivity in nursing qualitative research.

Stephen Buetow1.   

Abstract

Nurses routinely engage in pattern recognition and interpretation in qualitative research and clinical practice. However, they risk spontaneously perceiving patterns among things that are not meaningfully related. Although all people are prone to this cognitive bias of "apophenia", nurses may be at increased risk because they commonly produce or at least use qualitative research that can be highly interpretive. Qualitative researchers have been silent on the risk of apophenia and hence on exploring how attention to apophenia could help to indicate and manage such unconscious biases. Therefore this conceptual paper suggests how, in disciplines like nursing, researchers could attend to and use reflexivity on signs of possible apophenia to help bring unconscious biases to awareness. Within safe communities of professional practice, the researchers could cooperate with trusted peers to reflect on how and why they may each perceive patterned phenomena from different perspectives. If one reason is that the researchers, for example, appear to exhibit particular unconscious biases, then dialogue could help them to become aware of, and reflect on the biases. This expansion of researchers' consciousness of bias could inform the management of apophenia and enhance the quality of qualitative research and modern nursing practice.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apophenia; Cognitive bias; Pattern recognition; Patternicity; Qualitative research; Unconscious bias

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30316055     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  8 in total

1.  COVID as a catalyst: medical student perspectives on professional identity formation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jordan Williams-Yuen; Mahesh Shunmugam; Haley Smith; Sandra Jarvis-Selinger; Maria Hubinette
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2022-07-06

2.  How do clinicians rate patient's performance status using the ECOG performance scale? A mixed-methods exploration of variability in decision-making in oncology.

Authors:  Soumitra S Datta; Niladri Ghosal; Rhea Daruvala; Santam Chakraborty; Raj Kumar Shrimali; Chantalle van Zanten; Joe Parry; Sanjit Agrawal; Shrikant Atreya; Subir Sinha; Sanjoy Chatterjee; Simon Gollins
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-03-28

3.  Pathology is Always Around Us: Apophenia in Pathology, a Remarkable Unreported Phenomenon.

Authors:  Ahmed S Sultan; Maryam Jessri
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2019-09-25

4.  Phone follow up to families of COVID-19 patients who died at the hospital: families' grief reactions and clinical psychologists' roles.

Authors:  Julia Paola Menichetti Delor; Lidia Borghi; Eugenia Cao di San Marco; Ivan Fossati; Elena Vegni
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  The forgotten needs of mothers during neonatal transfers: A quest for greater sensitivity.

Authors:  Pradeep Ashokcoomar; Raisuyah Bhagwan
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-07-21

6.  Implementing a community-based shared care breast cancer survivorship model in Singapore: a qualitative study among primary care practitioners.

Authors:  Yu Ke; Rose Wai Yee Fok; Yoke Lim Soong; Kiley Wei-Jen Loh; Mohamad Farid; Lian Leng Low; Joanne Hui Min Quah; Farhad Fakhrudin Vasanwala; Sher Guan Low; Ling Ling Soh; Ngiap-Chuan Tan; Alexandre Chan
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-04-08

7.  An exploratory study of the experiences and challenges faced by advanced life support paramedics in the milieu of neonatal transfers.

Authors:  Raisuyah Bhagwan; Pradeep Ashokcoomar
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2021-10-28

8.  "It's Been Ugly": A Large-Scale Qualitative Study into the Difficulties Frontline Doctors Faced across Two Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sophie Harris; Elizabeth Jenkinson; Edward Carlton; Tom Roberts; Jo Daniels
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.