Katja Petrowski1,2, Benedict Herhaus3, Christian Schöniger4, Mark Frank5,6, Jaroslaw Pyrc7. 1. Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. katja.petrowski@tu-dresden.de. 2. Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Clinic and Policlinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128, Mainz, Germany. katja.petrowski@tu-dresden.de. 3. Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Clinic and Policlinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medicine Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55128, Mainz, Germany. 4. Department of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universitaet Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, City Hospital Görlitz, Görlitz, Germany. 6. DRF Stiftung Luftrettung gemeinnützige AG, Air Rescue Base Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 7. University Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medicine Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The occupation of the emergency physicians (EPs) of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) can be characterized as a high-strain occupation (Karasek in Adm Sci Q 24(2):285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498 , 1979). Therefore, the aim of this study was to measure and compare the stress load of the EPs of HEMS on duty on air ambulance workdays and on 2 control days. METHODS: In this field study (within-subjects design), hormonal, physiological, and self-perceived stress levels of 20 EPs [3 females, 17 males; mean age (M) = 44.95 years, SD = 4.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (42.71, 47.19)] of HEMS, were recorded on different test days. Measurements of the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and the heart rate variability (HRV) were performed while on duty on the air ambulance and during workdays at the outpatient clinic as well as at home on days of rest. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the CAR (area under the curve with respect to ground F(2,38) = 12.81, p < 0.001) between the 3 test days with the highest values on the workday at the outpatient clinic [M = 81.24; 98.75% CI (61.24, 101.24)] and not on the air ambulance day [M = 61.82; 98.75% CI (45.18, 78.46)] or on the day of rest [M = 52.96; 98.75% CI (38.17, 67.76)]. In addition, the HRV parameter SDNN [F(2,38) = 6.369; p = 0.004] presented significant differences between the 3 test days with lower levels on the day at the outpatient clinic [M = 101.44; 98.75% CI (83.50, 119.38)] in contrast to the air ambulance day [M = 120.16; 98.75% CI (100.02, 140.30)] and to the resting day [M = 123.79; 98.75% CI (106.49, 141.10)]. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the HRV parameter LF/HF [F(2,38) = 6.215; p = 0.005] between the 3 testing days with the highest values on the workday at the outpatient clinic [M = 8.69; 98.75% CI (6.29, 11.09)] compared to the air ambulance day [M = 6.54; 98.75% CI (4.50, 8.57)] and the day of rest [M = 6.43; 98.75% CI (4.57, 8.29)]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the standard values and previous studies, EPs of HEMS have an increase in hormonal reactivity in the morning and a lack of recovery of the ANS. It can be concluded that-with respect to the psychobiological stress model by McEwen and Lasley (The end of stress as we know it, National Academic Press, Washington, 2003)-work-related stressors persist too long or the stress response is exaggerated (allostatic load) due to chronic stress induction and lack of recovery.
PURPOSE: The occupation of the emergency physicians (EPs) of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) can be characterized as a high-strain occupation (Karasek in Adm Sci Q 24(2):285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498 , 1979). Therefore, the aim of this study was to measure and compare the stress load of the EPs of HEMS on duty on air ambulance workdays and on 2 control days. METHODS: In this field study (within-subjects design), hormonal, physiological, and self-perceived stress levels of 20 EPs [3 females, 17 males; mean age (M) = 44.95 years, SD = 4.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) (42.71, 47.19)] of HEMS, were recorded on different test days. Measurements of the cortisol awakening response (CAR) and the heart rate variability (HRV) were performed while on duty on the air ambulance and during workdays at the outpatient clinic as well as at home on days of rest. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the CAR (area under the curve with respect to ground F(2,38) = 12.81, p < 0.001) between the 3 test days with the highest values on the workday at the outpatient clinic [M = 81.24; 98.75% CI (61.24, 101.24)] and not on the air ambulance day [M = 61.82; 98.75% CI (45.18, 78.46)] or on the day of rest [M = 52.96; 98.75% CI (38.17, 67.76)]. In addition, the HRV parameter SDNN [F(2,38) = 6.369; p = 0.004] presented significant differences between the 3 test days with lower levels on the day at the outpatient clinic [M = 101.44; 98.75% CI (83.50, 119.38)] in contrast to the air ambulance day [M = 120.16; 98.75% CI (100.02, 140.30)] and to the resting day [M = 123.79; 98.75% CI (106.49, 141.10)]. Furthermore, there were significant differences in the HRV parameter LF/HF [F(2,38) = 6.215; p = 0.005] between the 3 testing days with the highest values on the workday at the outpatient clinic [M = 8.69; 98.75% CI (6.29, 11.09)] compared to the air ambulance day [M = 6.54; 98.75% CI (4.50, 8.57)] and the day of rest [M = 6.43; 98.75% CI (4.57, 8.29)]. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the standard values and previous studies, EPs of HEMS have an increase in hormonal reactivity in the morning and a lack of recovery of the ANS. It can be concluded that-with respect to the psychobiological stress model by McEwen and Lasley (The end of stress as we know it, National Academic Press, Washington, 2003)-work-related stressors persist too long or the stress response is exaggerated (allostatic load) due to chronic stress induction and lack of recovery.
Authors: Mari S Machi; Matthew Staum; Clifton W Callaway; Charity Moore; Kwonho Jeong; Joe Suyama; P Daniel Patterson; David Hostler Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Desta B Fekedulegn; Michael E Andrew; Cecil M Burchfiel; John M Violanti; Tara A Hartley; Luenda E Charles; Diane B Miller Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Marc N Jarczok; Marion Jarczok; Daniel Mauss; Julian Koenig; Jian Li; Raphael M Herr; Julian F Thayer Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Linn K Kuehl; Kim Hinkelmann; Christoph Muhtz; Lucia Dettenborn; Katja Wingenfeld; Carsten Spitzer; Clemens Kirschbaum; Klaus Wiedemann; Christian Otte Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Christian Schöniger; Jaroslaw Pyrc; Martin Siepmann; Benedict Herhaus; Katja Petrowski Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 3.015