Literature DB >> 30314831

Patient knowledge and attitudes toward cervical cancer screening after the 2012 screening guidelines.

Jayanti M Clay1, Joanne K Daggy1, Sunetris Fluellen1, Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess women's attitudes and preferences related to recent changes in cervical cancer screening guidelines.
METHODS: We distributed 380 surveys in three University based and Community clinics. Study participants anonymously completed surveys, which included questions related to demographics, cervical cancer, screening practices, risk perception and attitudes towards changing practices.
RESULTS: 315 women agreed to participate (83%). 60% (185/310) of participants had some college education or higher and 12% (36/305) worked in the medical field. On average, participants answered 4.1 (SD = 1.3) of the 8 knowledge questions correctly. Knowledge scores significantly increased with education level (Kruskal-Wallis test p-value < 0.001). The majority (72%, n = 228) reported that they should be screened annually, and that screening should be initiated with the onset of sexual activity (63%, n = 197). Participants that were more knowledgeable of current screening practices were more comfortable extending screening intervals (Kruskal-Wallis test p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Even among a relatively highly educated population of women, participants had limited knowledge of cervical cancer and current screening guidelines. Many participants reported discomfort with less frequent screening intervals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This study supports the need for improvement in cervical cancer prevention education especially with regards to the new screening guidelines.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Cervical cancer; Guidelines; Knowledge; Prevention; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30314831     DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  2 in total

1.  Changing Preferences for a Cervical Cancer Screening Strategy: Moving Away from Annual Testing.

Authors:  Elizabeth Schrier; Hunter K Holt; Miriam Kuppermann; George F Sawaya
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-08-04

2.  Unindicated cervical cancer screening in adolescent females within a large healthcare system in the United States.

Authors:  Hillary Hosier; Sangini S Sheth; Carlos R Oliveira; Lauren E Perley; Alla Vash-Margita
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.