Literature DB >> 30314772

Factors associated with specific health, welfare and reproductive performance indicators in pig herds from five EU countries.

Ilias Chantziaras1, Jeroen Dewulf2, Tommy Van Limbergen3, Marlijn Klinkenberg3, Andreas Palzer4, Carlos Pineiro5, Vivi Aarestrup Moustsen6, Jarkko Niemi7, Ilias Kyriazakis8, Dominiek Maes3.   

Abstract

Production diseases are often of multi-factorial origin in which environment (housing, nutrition and management) health and reproductive challenges show complex interactions. The aim of this study was to identify specific environment-related factors and to discuss their associations with health, welfare and reproductive performance in sows and piglets, in diverse systems using data from 130 farms from five EU countries. Two sets of data were used: a) a questionnaire was developed for sows and piglets covering farm management, interventions and housing and b) farm production data covering various performance parameters. Eight parameters were further selected, four of which were related to sow reproductive performance (litter index, replacement rate, repeat breeding (i.e. failure to breed after one mating), weaning to first mating interval) and the remaining four to litter / piglet health performance (piglets born alive per litter, piglets born dead per litter, preweaning mortality rate and weaned piglets per litter). Univariable and multivariable linear models were employed to identify risk factors. Associations were considered significant if P ≤ 0.007 (a criterion of p ≤ 0.05 corrected for the number of parameters tested). Various risk and protective factors were identified for each tested outcome variable. Country effects were included in all models as a fixed factor. Adjusted R-squared values for the multivariable models varied between 9.6% (preweaning mortality) and 66% (litter index). Litter index (litters/sow/year) was negatively associated with a higher weaning age of the piglets. Housing recently weaned sows to be inseminated in a separate unit from the gestation unit had a positive association with litter index. Repeat breeding was negatively associated with PRRS-free farms, farms that bred (raised) all gilts on the farm and farms that perform farrowing induction of sows. PRRS-free farms were also associated with a higher replacement rate. Farms that bred gilts on the farm and PRRS-free farms were negatively associated with preweaning mortality. Natural ventilation in the gestation unit was associated with fewer piglets born alive and with fewer weaned piglets. Closed type of farms was associated with less piglets born dead. The use of open box housing system for pregnant sows (provision of individual resting areas) was associated with more weaned piglets. In conclusion, several factors related to applying good farm and health management, and optimal housing conditions showed positive association with various sow and piglet performance parameters. Further studies will help to assess causal links for these factors.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal health; Farm management; Performance parameters; Pig; Risk indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30314772     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  10 in total

1.  Economic feasibility of interventions targeted at decreasing piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality across European countries.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Ilias Chantziaras; Dominiek Maes; Vivi Aarestrup Moustsen; Dimitri De Meyer; Hélène Quesnel; Ilias Kyriazakis; Jarkko K Niemi
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-06-01

2.  A critical reflection on intensive pork production with an emphasis on animal health and welfare.

Authors:  Dominiek G D Maes; Jeroen Dewulf; Carlos Piñeiro; Sandra Edwards; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  A new device for deep cervical artificial insemination in gilts reduces the number of sperm per dose without impairing final reproductive performance.

Authors:  Pedro J Llamas-López; Rebeca López-Úbeda; Gustavo López; Emily Antinoja; Francisco A García-Vázquez
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-01-28

4.  Implementation and evaluation of different eradication strategies for Brachyspira hyodysenteriae.

Authors:  Willem Neirynck; Filip Boyen; Ilias Chantziaras; Tamara Vandersmissen; Philip Vyt; Freddy Haesebrouck; Jeroen Dewulf; Dominiek Maes
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2020-09-14

5.  Farm characteristics affecting antibiotic consumption in pig farms in England.

Authors:  S M Matheson; S A Edwards; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-01-28

6.  Study on the influence of different production factors on PSY and its correlation.

Authors:  Ran Guan; Xingdong Zhou; Hongbo Cai; Xiaorui Qian; Xiaoyu Xin; Xiaowen Li
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-03-14

7.  Systematic review of animal-based indicators to measure thermal, social, and immune-related stress in pigs.

Authors:  Raúl David Guevara; Jose J Pastor; Xavier Manteca; Gemma Tedo; Pol Llonch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  Machine learning based personalized promotion strategy of piglets weaned per sow per year in large-scale pig farms.

Authors:  Xingdong Zhou; Ran Guan; Hongbo Cai; Pei Wang; Yongchun Yang; Xiaodu Wang; Xiaowen Li; Houhui Song
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-08-10

9.  Modelling the links between farm characteristics, respiratory health and pig production traits.

Authors:  H Gray; M Friel; C Goold; R P Smith; S M Williamson; L M Collins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A value chain analysis of interventions to control production diseases in the intensive pig production sector.

Authors:  Jarkko Niemi; Richard Bennett; Beth Clark; Lynn Frewer; Philip Jones; Thomas Rimmler; Richard Tranter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.