Literature DB >> 30314669

Expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 and immune checkpoint markers in residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Hyun-Soo Kim1, Ji-Ye Kim2, Yong Jae Lee3, So Hee Kim3, Jung-Yun Lee4, Eun Ji Nam3, Sunghoon Kim3, Sang Wun Kim3, Young Tae Kim3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prognostic value of the expressions of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and immune checkpoint markers in residual tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).
METHODS: We collected pre- and post-NAC tumor samples from patients with advanced HGSOC between 2006 and 2017. Post-NAC tumor tissue samples were available for immunostaining from 131 patients. The expressions of PD-L1 and immune checkpoint markers were assessed by immunohistochemical staining and the status of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was also evaluated. We examined whether there are significant associations between protein expression status and patient outcomes and whether significant changes in protein expression levels occurred in response to NAC.
RESULTS: PD-L1 expression in the tumor cells was evaluated in 113 patients, 12 (10.6%) of whom had high PD-L1 expression (≥25%) in post-NAC tissues. However, these high levels were not associated with progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.348) or overall survival (OS; P = 0.699). Similarly, high stromal TILs [≥50%; n = 16 (15.0%)] among the 107 patients evaluated did not show any significant impact on PFS (P = 0.250) or OS (P = 0.800). Moreover, an abundance of TILs (intraepithelial, CD8+, and Foxp3+) and the expression of immune checkpoint markers (PD-1, ICOS, and LAG-3) in residual tumors did not confer any significant survival benefit. The impact of NAC on PD-L1 expression and stromal TILs varied considerably among individual patients.
CONCLUSION: Although the expression of PD-L1 and immune checkpoint markers in residual tumors after NAC had no prognostic impact on survival in patients with HGSOC, post-NAC evaluation of these proteins in chemoresistant tumors may help select patients for immunotherapy trials.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-grade serous ovarian cancer; Immune checkpoint; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Ovarian cancer; Programmed cell death ligand 1; Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30314669     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  14 in total

1.  Clinicopathological and Molecular Differences Between Gastric-type Mucinous Carcinoma and Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Hera Jung; Go Eun Bae; Hye Min Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 2.  The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the hypoxic and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment: perspectives for therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Ryota Tamura; Toshihide Tanaka; Yasuharu Akasaki; Yuichi Murayama; Kazunari Yoshida; Hikaru Sasaki
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  PARP inhibitors and immunotherapy in ovarian and endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Rowan E Miller; Amy J Lewis; Melanie E Powell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  HHLA2 predicts better survival and exhibits inhibited proliferation in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Guocai Xu; Yuanyuan Shi; Xiaoting Ling; Dongyan Wang; Yunyun Liu; Huaiwu Lu; Yongpai Peng; Bingzhong Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus durvalumab and tremelimumab in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 3046), TRU-D.

Authors:  Jung Yun Lee; Jae Weon Kim; Myong Cheol Lim; Sunghoon Kim; Hee Seung Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Ju Yeon Yi; Sang Yoon Park; Byoung Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Prognostic value of programmed cell death ligand-1 expression in ovarian cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jinlan Piao; Hyun Ji Lim; Maria Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-03-24

7.  Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-Activation Gene 3 (LAG3) in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ramy R Saleh; Paloma Peinado; Jesús Fuentes-Antrás; Pedro Pérez-Segura; Atanasio Pandiella; Eitan Amir; Alberto Ocaña
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Differential expression of PD-L1 between primary and metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer and its clinico-pathological correlation.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar Parvathareddy; Abdul K Siraj; Ismail A Al-Badawi; Asma Tulbah; Fouad Al-Dayel; Khawla S Al-Kuraya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Biomarker-guided targeted therapy in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (AMBITION; KGOG 3045): a multicentre, open-label, five-arm, uncontrolled, umbrella trial.

Authors:  Jung-Yun Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Jae-Weon Kim; Jung Bok Lee; Eunhyang Park; Je-Gun Joung; Sunghoon Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Hee Seung Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 4.756

10.  CDK4/6 inhibition promotes immune infiltration in ovarian cancer and synergizes with PD-1 blockade in a B cell-dependent manner.

Authors:  Qian-Feng Zhang; Jia Li; Kuo Jiang; Rui Wang; Jun-Li Ge; Hong Yang; Shu-Juan Liu; Lin-Tao Jia; Lei Wang; Bi-Liang Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.