| Literature DB >> 30314267 |
Jingjing Zhang1,2, Fang Luan3, Qing Li4, Guodong Gu5, Fang Dong6, Zhanyong Guo7,8.
Abstract
Chemical modification is one of the most effective methoEntities:
Keywords: 3,6-diamino-chitin; 6-amino-chitin; antifungal activity; chitin derivative; structure characteristics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30314267 PMCID: PMC6212816 DOI: 10.3390/md16100380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Scheme 1Synthetic route for the preparation of 6-amino-chitin (NCT) and 3,6-diamino-chitin (DNCT).
The abbreviations for the derivatives.
| Monosubstituted Chitin Derivatives | Disubstituted Chitin Derivatives | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Name | Abbreviations | Full Name | Abbreviations |
| 6-tosyl-chitin | TCT | 3,6-ditosyl-chitin | DTCT |
| 6-azido-chitin | ACT | 3,6-diazido-chitin | DACT |
| 6-amino-chitin | NCT | 3,6-diamino-chitin | DNCT |
The elemental analyses of chitin (CT), its monosubstituted derivatives, and its disubstituted derivatives.
| Sample | Found (%) | DS | Formula | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | H | N | S | |||
| CT | 45.2 | 7.2 | 6.6 | - | - | C8H13NO5 |
| TCT | 50.2 | 6.6 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 0.93 | (C15H19NO7S)0.93(CT)0.07 |
| DTCT | 50.3 | 13.9 | 3.6 | 10.0 | 1.2 | (C15H19NO7S)0.8(C22H25NO9S2)0.2 |
| ACT | 43.3 | 5.3 | 21.9 | - | 0.97 | (TCT)0.1 (C8H12N4O4)0.9 |
| DACT | 40.4 | 4.7 | 21.3 | - | 1.14 | (DTCT)0.03(C8H12N4O4)0.78 (C8H11N7O3)0.18 |
| NCT | 47.0 | 6.8 | 15.0 | - | 0.96 | (ACT)0.04 (C8H14N2O4)0.87 |
| DNCT | 45.5 | 6.4 | 13.3 | - | 1.11 | (DACT)0.03 (C8H14N2O4)0.76(C8H15N3O3)0.17 |
Figure 1FT-IR spectra of chitin, its monosubstituted (a) and disubstituted (b) derivatives.
Figure 2The solid-state 13C NMR spectra of chitin, its monosubstituted derivatives and its disubstituted derivatives.
Figure 3XRD spectra of chitin (A), 6-amino-chitin (B), and 3,6-diamino-dideoxychitin (C).
Figure 4Surface morphology of chitin (A), 6-amino-chitin (B), and 3,6-diamino-chitin (C).
Antifungal activity against various fungi (from A to F were represented F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerium, B. cinerea, C. lagenarium, P. asparagi, F. oxyspirum f. niveum, and G. zeae, respectively).
| Sample | Inhibition Zone Diameter Against Various Fungi (mm) a | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| Carbendazim | 24.3 ± 1.3 | 19.9 ± 0.9 | 16.3 ± 0.5 | 27.8 ± 1.1 | 18.6 ± 0.4 | 21.8 ± 1.0 |
| Amphotericin B | 16.1 ± 1.0 | 14.2 ± 0.4 | 8.0 ± 0.8 | 18.9 ± 1.8 | 9.6 ± 0.5 | 15.7 ± 0.7 |
| CT | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.5 ± 0.2 | 5.3 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.2 |
| NCT | 16.3 ± 1.3 * | 11.2 ± 0.5 ** | 13.1 ± 0.9 * | 14.2 ± 1.0 * | 12.4 ± 0.2 ** | 14.9 ± 0.6 ** |
| DNCT | 20.4 ± 1.7 ** | 11.4 ± 0.2 ** | 14.0 ± 0.5 ** | 15.6 ± 1.5 * | 14.2 ± 0.5 ** | 16.3 ± 1.3 ** |
a Zone diameter of the inhibition including disc. Values are presented as means ± SD of three separate experiments (*: 0.01 < P < 0.05; **: 0.001 < P < 0.01).