Literature DB >> 30312791

Comparison of the UV/chlorine and UV/H2O2 processes in the degradation of PPCPs in simulated drinking water and wastewater: Kinetics, radical mechanism and energy requirements.

Kaiheng Guo1, Zihao Wu1, Shuwen Yan2, Bo Yao2, Weihua Song2, Zhechao Hua1, Xuewen Zhang1, Xiujuan Kong1, Xuchun Li3, Jingyun Fang4.   

Abstract

The degradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) by the UV/H2O2 and UV/chlorine processes was compared at practical concentrations in simulated drinking water and wastewater. In pure water, the UV/chlorine process performed better than the UV/H2O2 process for the degradation of 16 PPCPs among the investigated 28 PPCPs under neutral conditions. Interestingly, the UV/chlorine approach was superior to the UV/H2O2 approach for the removal of all PPCPs in simulated drinking water and wastewater at the same molar oxidant dosage. The radical sink by oxidants and/or H2O was 2-3 orders of magnitude higher in UV/chlorine than UV/H2O2 in pure water. Thus, the UV/chlorine process was less affected by the water and wastewater matrices than UV/H2O2. In UV/chlorine, the concentration of ClO• was calculated to be ∼3 orders of magnitude greater than that of HO• in pure water, and the reactivities of ClO• with some PPCPs were as high as > 108 M-1 s-1. ClO• was mainly scavenged by the effluent organic matter (EfOM) with a rate constant of 1.8 × 104 (mg L-1)-1 s-1 in wastewater. Meanwhile, secondary radicals such as Br•, Br2•-, ClBr•- and CO3•- further contributed to PPCP degradation by the UV/chlorine process in wastewater, whose concentrations were at least 2 orders of magnitude higher than that in UV/H2O2. Compared with the UV/H2O2 process, the UV/chlorine process saved 3.5-93.5% and 19.1%-98.1% electrical energy per order (EE/O) for PPCP degradation in simulated drinking water and wastewater, respectively.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced oxidation process; Hydroxyl radicals; Reactive halogen radicals; UV/Chlorine; UV/H(2)O(2); Water treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30312791     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.08.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  2 in total

1.  Ultraviolet-coupled advanced oxidation processes for anti-COVID-19 drugs treatment: Degradation mechanisms, transformation products and toxicity evolution.

Authors:  Tenghao Huang; Junjie Guo; Gang Lu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 8.943

2.  Comparison of UV-induced AOPs (UV/Cl2, UV/NH2Cl, UV/ClO2 and UV/H2O2 ) in the degradation of iopamidol: Kinetics, energy requirements and DBPs-related toxicity in sequential disinfection processes.

Authors:  Fu-Xiang Tian; Wen-Kai Ye; Bin Xu; Xiao-Jun Hu; Shi-Xu Ma; Fan Lai; Yu-Qiong Gao; Hai-Bo Xing; Wei-Hong Xia; Bo Wang
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 13.273

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.