Literature DB >> 30312715

Performance of the Flash Glucose Monitoring System during exercise in youth with Type 1 diabetes.

Elisa Giani1, Maddalena Macedoni2, Anna Barilli2, Agnese Petitti2, Chiara Mameli2, Alessandra Bosetti2, Andrea Cristiano3, Dejan Radovanovic3, Pierachille Santus3, Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti2.   

Abstract

AIM: Metabolic changes during exercise may affect the accuracy of glucose sensors impacting on Type 1 diabetes (T1D) management. The present study aimed at assessing the performance of the Flash Glucose Monitoring system (isCGM) during exercise and in free-living condition in youth with T1D.
METHODS: Seventeen youth (53% male), aged 13.7 ± 3.8 years, with T1D for 5.4 ± 3.8 years, HbA1c 7.4 ± 1.0% (57 ± 11 mmol/mol), were enrolled. Paired isCGM, plasma (PG) and capillary (CG) glucose values (total of 136) were collected during an interval exercise (45 min at 55% VO2max load with 20 s sprints at 80% VO2max every 10 min). Paired isCGM and CG (total of 832) were collected during free-living condition.
RESULTS: During exercise, isCGM absolute relative difference (ARDs) means/medians were 12.5/9.4% versus PG and 15.4/10.8% versus CG. During rest, ARDs means/medians were 16.6/12.0%. The Consensus Error Grid analysis showed 98.4% of readings during exercise and 97.24% during rest in zones A + B. Percentage of readings meeting the ISO criteria for CG levels <5.55 mmol/L was 62.5% during exercise, 53.4% during rest; for CG levels ≥5.55 mmol/L was 64.0% during exercise, 60.4% during rest.
CONCLUSIONS: isCGM demonstrated similar clinical safety and performance during exercise and in everyday life; further studies are needed to confirm its accuracy during exercise.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Exercise; Libre; Pediatric; Type 1 diabetes; isCGM

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30312715     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  4 in total

1.  Cutaneous Complications With Continuous or Flash Glucose Monitoring Use: Systematic Review of Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Nurul A Mohd Asarani; Andrew N Reynolds; Sara E Boucher; Martin de Bock; Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-27

2.  Lag Time Remains with Newer Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology During Aerobic Exercise in Adults Living with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Dessi P Zaharieva; Kamuran Turksoy; Sarah M McGaugh; Rubin Pooni; Todd Vienneau; Trang Ly; Michael C Riddell
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Enhanced Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring during Exercise through Physical Activity Tracking Integration.

Authors:  Alejandro José Laguna Sanz; José Luis Díez; Marga Giménez; Jorge Bondia
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Glucose management for exercise using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) systems in type 1 diabetes: position statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) endorsed by JDRF and supported by the American Diabetes Association (ADA).

Authors:  Othmar Moser; Michael C Riddell; Max L Eckstein; Peter Adolfsson; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Louisa van den Boom; Pieter Gillard; Kirsten Nørgaard; Nick S Oliver; Dessi P Zaharieva; Tadej Battelino; Carine de Beaufort; Richard M Bergenstal; Bruce Buckingham; Eda Cengiz; Asma Deeb; Tim Heise; Simon Heller; Aaron J Kowalski; Lalantha Leelarathna; Chantal Mathieu; Christoph Stettler; Martin Tauschmann; Hood Thabit; Emma G Wilmot; Harald Sourij; Carmel E Smart; Peter G Jacobs; Richard M Bracken; Julia K Mader
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.866

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.