Literature DB >> 30312674

Outpatient Surgical Management for Acquired Buried Penis.

Scott G Erpelding1, Marilyn Hopkins2, Adam Dugan3, James Y Liau4, Shubham Gupta2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of outpatient surgical management for patients with acquired buried penis (ABP).
METHODS: We conducted an Institutional Review Board approved review of patients who underwent surgical repair of ABP at a single institution from September 2014 to August 2017. Patient characteristics, operative details, and 30- and 90-day complications were assessed.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent surgical repair of ABP at the University of Kentucky during the study period. Mean age was 54 years (range 44-62). Median body mass index (BMI) was 47.7 (range 25.5-53.3). Patients largely underwent penile liberation, escutcheonectomy, and split thickness skin grafting. Concurrent scrotoplasty and urethroplasty were performed in select cases. The majority of patients 10/16 (62.5%) were discharged on the same day of surgery, while the remaining 6/16 (37.5%) were outpatient extended stay-and were discharged on postoperative day 1. The 30- and 90-day complications were 19% and 25% respectively, all were Clavien II. Split thickness skin graft take was 100%, and technical success was achieved in all patients. Patients with complications had higher BMIs, higher rates of diabetes, and higher rates of tobacco use, though only BMI reached statistical significance (P = .0150, P = .5846, and P = .0632) respectively.
CONCLUSION: Multi component repair of adult ABP can be safely done on an outpatient basis without need for routine inpatient admission and complex algorithms. The most common complication is surgical site infection, which arose in the first 30 days postoperatively. Higher BMI was a significant risk factor for complications.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30312674     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  Predictors of surgical complications and evaluation of outcomes after surgical correction of adult-acquired buried penis.

Authors:  Mélanie Aubé; Michael Chua; Jessica DeLong; Kurt McCammon; Jeremy Tonkin; David Gilbert; Ramón Virasoro
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Outpatient buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty outcomes are comparable to inpatient procedures.

Authors:  Maxim J McKibben; Michael T Davenport; Partho Mukherjee; Nabeel A Shakir; Mary L West; Joceline S Fuchs; Ellen E Ward; Rachel L Bergeson; Jeremy M Scott; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

3.  Can malleable penile prosthesis implantation improve voiding dysfunction in men with concurrent erectile dysfunction and buried penis?

Authors:  Eric Chung; Brian Ng Hung Shin; Juan Wang
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 4.  The concealed morbidity of buried penis: a narrative review of our progress in understanding adult-acquired buried penis as a surgical condition.

Authors:  Christopher J Staniorski; Paul J Rusilko
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

Review 5.  Buried penis repair: tips and tricks.

Authors:  Jacob Robert Stephen; Frank N Burks
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.