| Literature DB >> 30312589 |
Evan G DeRenzo1, Joel Moss2, Eric A Singer3.
Abstract
This paper looks at the implications of changes to the regulatory governance of human participant research that can be expected with implementation of the Revised Common Rule (RCR). The RCR refers to revisions of the existing federal regulations that govern the performance of research involving human subjects (ie, clinical research) in the United States and, under certain circumstances, when such research is also performed outside the United States. The term "common" is included because it refers to the fact that these regulations, often referred to as Code of Federal Regulations 46, is the common denominator regulations agreed to across a wide swath of federal agencies.Entities:
Keywords: biospecimen; capacity; clinical research; common rule; human participant research; human subject research; informed consent; institutional review board; research ethics; revised common rule
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30312589 PMCID: PMC6363814 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chest ISSN: 0012-3692 Impact factor: 9.410