INTRODUCTION: Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) are the mainstay of treatment of hydrocephalus but frequently need revision. We sought to directly compare the impact of laparoscopic versus open peritoneal shunt revision on the need for subsequent VPS revisions in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively maintained, externally validated database of pediatric patients who underwent a first peritoneal VPS revision at a single center between 2008 and 2016 was reviewed. Outcomes, including subsequent revisions, shunt infections, operative time, and hospital stay between open and laparoscopic groups, were compared. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients underwent a first peritoneal VPS revision during the time period-40 laparoscopically and 108 open-with no significant difference in age or gender between the groups. Operative time, length of stay after shunt revision, and shunt infection rates did not vary between laparoscopic versus open revisions. There was no significant difference between need for subsequent overall (peritoneal or ventricular) shunt revisions in the laparoscopic (20%) versus the open group (34%), P = .07. However, there were significantly fewer frequent peritoneal revisions in the laparoscopic group (3% versus 15%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This first cohort analysis of laparoscopic versus open VPS revision in pediatric patients suggests that laparoscopic peritoneal VPS revision may reduce the rate of subsequent peritoneal revisions without increasing shunt infections or operative time in pediatric patients.
INTRODUCTION: Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) are the mainstay of treatment of hydrocephalus but frequently need revision. We sought to directly compare the impact of laparoscopic versus open peritoneal shunt revision on the need for subsequent VPS revisions in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively maintained, externally validated database of pediatric patients who underwent a first peritoneal VPS revision at a single center between 2008 and 2016 was reviewed. Outcomes, including subsequent revisions, shunt infections, operative time, and hospital stay between open and laparoscopic groups, were compared. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients underwent a first peritoneal VPS revision during the time period-40 laparoscopically and 108 open-with no significant difference in age or gender between the groups. Operative time, length of stay after shunt revision, and shunt infection rates did not vary between laparoscopic versus open revisions. There was no significant difference between need for subsequent overall (peritoneal or ventricular) shunt revisions in the laparoscopic (20%) versus the open group (34%), P = .07. However, there were significantly fewer frequent peritoneal revisions in the laparoscopic group (3% versus 15%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: This first cohort analysis of laparoscopic versus open VPS revision in pediatric patients suggests that laparoscopic peritoneal VPS revision may reduce the rate of subsequent peritoneal revisions without increasing shunt infections or operative time in pediatric patients.
Authors: Graham Mulvaney; Michael Arnold; Caroline Reinke; Scott Wait; Mark Van Poppel; Scott McLanahan; Thomas Schmelzer; Graham Cosper; Andrew Schulman; Sarah Jernigan Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-06-18