Literature DB >> 30312138

Image Predictors of Treatment Outcome after Thoracic Aortic Dissection Repair.

Farhood Saremi1, Cameron Hassani1, Leah M Lin1, Christopher Lee1, Alison G Wilcox1, Fernando Fleischman1, Mark J Cunningham1.   

Abstract

Treatment of thoracic aortic dissection remains highly challenging and is rapidly evolving. Common classifications of thoracic aortic dissection include the Stanford classification (types A and B) and the DeBakey classification (types I to III), as well as a new supplementary classification geared toward endovascular decision making. By using various imaging techniques, the extent of the dissection, the location of the primary intimal tear, the shape of the aortic arch, and the zonal involvement of the aortic arch-factors that affect the treatment strategy-can easily be identified. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is generally performed in two groups of patients: (a) those with a surgically repaired type A dissection, and (b) those with a complicated type B dissection. Several imaging findings can help predict the course of remodeling of the dissected aorta after a repaired type A dissection and TEVAR. A spectrum of imaging findings exist with regard to favorable (positive) or failing (negative) remodeling. A schematic model with imaging support allows the classification of important causes of failing remodeling into proximal and distal groups, on the basis of the origin of the refilling of the false lumen and the underlying pathophysiology of pressurization. Refilling of the false lumen of the aorta after repair of a type A dissection is usually secondary to a persistent intimal tear at the aortic arch, a leak of the distal graft anastomosis, or refilling from the false lumen of a dissected aortic arch vessel. After TEVAR, false lumen refilling is most commonly due to an incomplete seal of the proximal landing related to the aortic tortuosity, an arch branch stump, a supra-arch chimney stent, or the TEVAR technique. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30312138     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  7 in total

1.  Aortic visceral segment instability is evident following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute and subacute type B aortic dissection.

Authors:  Juliet Blakeslee-Carter; Hellen A Potter; Charles A Banks; Marc Passman; Benjamin Pearce; Graeme McFarland; Sukgu M Han; Salvatore Scali; Gregory A Magee; Emily Spangler; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.860

2.  Detection of the intimal tear in aortic dissection and ulcer-like projection in intramural hematoma: usefulness of full-phase retrospective ECG-gated CT angiography.

Authors:  Satoru Yanagaki; Takuya Ueda; Atsuro Masuda; Hideki Ota; Yuta Onaka; Masatoshi Kojima; Takashi Hattori; Wahei Mihara; Kei Takase
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Association of renal cyst and type A acute aortic dissection with hypertension.

Authors:  Jinlan Bao; Shaoxin Zheng; Canxia Huang; Jun Tao; Ying Tang; Runlu Sun; Qi Guo; Jingfeng Wang; Yuling Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Distal Aortic Remodeling after Type A Dissection Repair: An Ongoing Mirage.

Authors:  Kaushalendra Singh Rathore
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2021-12-05

5.  Aortic Agatston score correlates with the progression of acute type A aortic dissection.

Authors:  Yasushi Tashima; Shinichi Iwakoshi; Takeshi Inoue; Noriyuki Nakamura; Taichi Sano; Naoyuki Kimura; Takashi Inoue; Koichi Adachi; Atsushi Yamaguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Hybrid Technique on the Total Arch Replacement for Type A Aortic Dissection: 12-year Clinical and Radiographical Outcomes From a Single Center.

Authors:  Bowen Zhang; Xiaogang Sun; Yanxiang Liu; Yaojun Dun; Shenghua Liang; Cuntao Yu; Xiangyang Qian; Haoyu Gao; Jie Ren; Luchen Wang; Sangyu Zhou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-28

7.  A Novel Serum Biomarker Model to Discriminate Aortic Dissection from Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Peijiang Lu; Xin Feng; Rui Li; Peng Deng; Shiliang Li; Jiewen Xiao; Jing Fang; Xingyu Wang; Chang Liu; Qiuxia Zhu; Jing Wang; Zemin Fang; Lu Gao; Sen Guo; Xue-Jun Jiang; Xue-Hai Zhu; Tingting Qin; Xiang Wei; Xin Yi; Ding-Sheng Jiang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.464

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.