Taro Langner1, Anders Hedström2, Katharina Mörwald3,4, Daniel Weghuber3,4, Anders Forslund5, Peter Bergsten5,6, Håkan Ahlström1,2, Joel Kullberg1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 2. Antaros Medical, BioVenture Hub, Mölndal, Sweden. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. 4. Obesity Research Unit, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. 5. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 6. Department of Medical Cell Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An approach for the automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in multicenter water-fat MRI scans of the abdomen was investigated, using 2 different neural network architectures. METHODS: The 2 fully convolutional network architectures U-Net and V-Net were trained, evaluated, and compared using the water-fat MRI data. Data of the study Tellus with 90 scans from a single center was used for a 10-fold cross-validation in which the most successful configuration for both networks was determined. These configurations were then tested on 20 scans of the multicenter study beta-cell function in JUvenile Diabetes and Obesity (BetaJudo), which involved a different study population and scanning device. RESULTS: The U-Net outperformed the used implementation of the V-Net in both cross-validation and testing. In cross-validation, the U-Net reached average dice scores of 0.988 (VAT) and 0.992 (SAT). The average of the absolute quantification errors amount to 0.67% (VAT) and 0.39% (SAT). On the multicenter test data, the U-Net performs only slightly worse, with average dice scores of 0.970 (VAT) and 0.987 (SAT) and quantification errors of 2.80% (VAT) and 1.65% (SAT). CONCLUSION: The segmentations generated by the U-Net allow for reliable quantification and could therefore be viable for high-quality automated measurements of VAT and SAT in large-scale studies with minimal need for human intervention. The high performance on the multicenter test data furthermore shows the robustness of this approach for data of different patient demographics and imaging centers, as long as a consistent imaging protocol is used.
PURPOSE: An approach for the automated segmentation of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in multicenter water-fat MRI scans of the abdomen was investigated, using 2 different neural network architectures. METHODS: The 2 fully convolutional network architectures U-Net and V-Net were trained, evaluated, and compared using the water-fat MRI data. Data of the study Tellus with 90 scans from a single center was used for a 10-fold cross-validation in which the most successful configuration for both networks was determined. These configurations were then tested on 20 scans of the multicenter study beta-cell function in JUvenile Diabetes and Obesity (BetaJudo), which involved a different study population and scanning device. RESULTS: The U-Net outperformed the used implementation of the V-Net in both cross-validation and testing. In cross-validation, the U-Net reached average dice scores of 0.988 (VAT) and 0.992 (SAT). The average of the absolute quantification errors amount to 0.67% (VAT) and 0.39% (SAT). On the multicenter test data, the U-Net performs only slightly worse, with average dice scores of 0.970 (VAT) and 0.987 (SAT) and quantification errors of 2.80% (VAT) and 1.65% (SAT). CONCLUSION: The segmentations generated by the U-Net allow for reliable quantification and could therefore be viable for high-quality automated measurements of VAT and SAT in large-scale studies with minimal need for human intervention. The high performance on the multicenter test data furthermore shows the robustness of this approach for data of different patient demographics and imaging centers, as long as a consistent imaging protocol is used.
Authors: Santiago Estrada; Ran Lu; Sailesh Conjeti; Ximena Orozco-Ruiz; Joana Panos-Willuhn; Monique M B Breteler; Martin Reuter Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sevgi Gokce Kafali; Shu-Fu Shih; Xinzhou Li; Shilpy Chowdhury; Spencer Loong; Samuel Barnes; Zhaoping Li; Holden H Wu Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2021-11
Authors: Samira Masoudi; Syed M Anwar; Stephanie A Harmon; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey; Ulas Bagci Journal: Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2020-07
Authors: Thomas Küstner; Tobias Hepp; Marc Fischer; Martin Schwartz; Andreas Fritsche; Hans-Ulrich Häring; Konstantin Nikolaou; Fabian Bamberg; Bin Yang; Fritz Schick; Sergios Gatidis; Jürgen Machann Journal: Radiol Artif Intell Date: 2020-10-28
Authors: Nicolas Linder; Kilian Solty; Anna Hartmann; Tobias Eggebrecht; Matthias Blüher; Roland Stange; Harald Busse Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Ina Vernikouskaya; Hans-Peter Müller; Dominik Felbel; Francesco Roselli; Albert C Ludolph; Jan Kassubek; Volker Rasche Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.379