Literature DB >> 30311668

Psychometric evaluation of the Texas revised inventory of grief in a sample of bereaved family caregivers.

Maja Holm1, Anette Alvariza2,3, Carl-Johan Fürst4, Joakim Öhlen5,6, Kristofer Årestedt7,8.   

Abstract

The Texas Revised Inventory of Grief (TRIG) was developed to measure the intensity of grief after the death of a close person. It consists of two scales: TRIG I (past behaviors) and TRIG II (present feelings). Because of inconsistencies in previous validations, the instrument needs to be further validated, hence the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the TRIG in a sample of bereaved family caregivers in Sweden. The TRIG was translated to Swedish according to standard principles, and 129 bereaved family caregivers completed the questionnaire. Parallel analysis was used to decide the number of factors to extract, followed by confirmatory factor analysis. An ordinal version of Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scales. Construct validity was tested against the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The factor analyses resulted in one factor being retained for both scales. The internal consistency was excellent (α > 0.9) for both scales. Construct validity was supported by strong correlations between TRIG I and TRIG II as well as moderate correlations between the TRIG scales and HADS. In conclusion, the TRIG has sound psychometric qualities and the two scales should be treated as unidimensional measures of grief. Hence, the instrument is suited to be used in the context of palliative care.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregivers; death and dying; grief/mourning; instrument development and validation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30311668     DOI: 10.1002/nur.21886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  5 in total

1.  Psychometric evaluation of the anticipatory grief scale in a sample of family caregivers in the context of palliative care.

Authors:  Maja Holm; Anette Alvariza; Carl-Johan Fürst; Joakim Öhlen; Kristofer Årestedt
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.186

2.  Associations between informal care costs, care quality, carer rewards, burden and subsequent grief: the international, access, rights and empowerment mortality follow-back study of the last 3 months of life (IARE I study).

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Deokhee Yi; Bridget M Johnston; Karen Ryan; Regina McQuillan; Lucy Selman; Stephen Z Pantilat; Barbara A Daveson; R Sean Morrison; Charles Normand
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Caregiver bereavement outcomes in advanced cancer: associations with quality of death and patient age.

Authors:  Kenneth Mah; Nadia Swami; Ashley Pope; Craig C Earle; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Rinat Nissim; Sarah Hales; Gary Rodin; Breffni Hannon; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale.

Authors:  Ekaterina An; Alyssa Tilly; Kenneth Mah; Warren Lewin; Mano Chandrakumar; Arnell Baguio; Nazira Jaffer; Maria Chikasema; Lameck Thambo; Christian Ntizimira; Eve Namisango; Sarah Hales; Camilla Zimmermann; Kayla Wolofsky; Mary Goombs; Gary Rodin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Intensity of Predeath Grief and Postdeath Grief of Family Caregivers in Palliative Care in Relation to Preparedness for Caregiving, Caregiver Burden, and Social Support.

Authors:  Lena Axelsson; Anette Alvariza; Maja Holm; Kristofer Årestedt
Journal:  Palliat Med Rep       Date:  2020-09-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.