| Literature DB >> 30310797 |
Jaewook Kim1, Ji-Hun Lim1, Joseph Jeong1, Seon-Ho Lee1, Jae-Cheol Jo2, Sang Hyuk Park1.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30310797 PMCID: PMC6170308 DOI: 10.5045/br.2018.53.3.261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Res ISSN: 2287-979X
Fig. 1Peripheral blood smears, bone marrow aspiration and touch print, bone marrow biopsy, and immunohistochemical staining results of our case. (A) Neoplastic lymphoid cells found in peripheral blood smear showed small-to-medium, cleaved nuclei and scant amount of cytoplasm (indicated by red arrows, Wright-Giemsa stain, ×400). (B) Neoplastic lymphoid cells found in the bone marrow aspirates also showed a small-to-medium, cleavage nucleus, and scant amount of cytoplasm as morphologic features (indicated by red arrows, Wright-Giemsa stain, ×400). (C) Neoplastic lymphoid cells found in touch print of the bone marrow also showed similar morphologic features (indicated by red arrows, Wright-Giemsa stain, ×400). (D) Bone marrow biopsy section showed infiltration of neoplastic lymphoid cells with a mixture of paratrabecular (indicated by red circle) and intertrabecular (indicated by blue circles) infiltration pattern (hematoxylin and eosin stain, × 100). (E, F) Neoplastic lymphoid cell did not show positivity on CD3 and CD5 immunohistochemical staining (×100). (G) However, neoplastic lymphoid cells showed strong membranous positivity for CD20 immunohistochemical staining (×100). (H, I) Neoplastic lymphoid cells found in paratrabecular areas showed strong nuclear positivity for BCL6, but those found in intertrabecular areas showed weak nuclear positivity for BCL6 (×100 and ×200, respectively).