| Literature DB >> 30310559 |
Jingru Wang1, Minghao Wang1, Xiaowei Zhang1,2, Shan Sun1, Aiping Zhang1, Ning Chen1, Changming Zhao1.
Abstract
Homoploid hybrid speciation (HHS), characterized by hybrid speciation without a change in chromosome number and facilitated by ecological divergence, is well known in angiosperms but rare in gymnosperms. Picea purpurea as one of two demonstrably conifer diploid hybrid species in gymnosperms has been found to occupy colder alpine habitats than its parents. However, studies on whether leaf frost tolerance and hydraulic safety exhibit transgressive segregation and thus play a role in conifer HHS are still lacking. In this study, we compared the frost tolerance of photosystem stability (the maximum efficiency of PSII, F v/F m), pressure-volume parameters, and xylem resistance to dysfunction of leaves (current-year twigs) and stems (annual shoots) between P. purpurea and its progenitors. The results indicated that P. purpurea had significantly lower osmotic potential at full turgor, water potential at turgor loss point, water potential at 12 % loss of conductance of stem, the maximum hydraulic conductance of stem and the temperature causing a 50 % reduction in initial F v/F m than its parental species. In contrast, the leaf and stem xylem pressure inducing 50 % loss of hydraulic conductivity (leaf Ψ50 and stem Ψ50, respectively) and hydraulic safety margin in leaf Ψ50, stem Ψ50 in P. purpurea showed no significant difference with those of P. wilsonii, but significantly larger than those of P. likiangensis. This suggests that the frost tolerance of photosystem stability and the cell dehydration tolerance in P. purpurea are superior to its parental species, facilitating its successful colonization and establishment in colder habitats.Entities:
Keywords: Cell dehydration; Picea purpurea; frost tolerance; homoploid hybrid speciation; maximum photochemical efficiency of photosystem II; water relations; xylem resistance to embolism
Year: 2018 PMID: 30310559 PMCID: PMC6174853 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/ply053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Comparison of main climate characteristic between Picea purpurea and its parental species. Significantly interspecific differences are indicated with different letters (P < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE.
| Environmental variables |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual mean temperature (°C) | 3.72 ± 0.32 b | 8.64 ± 0.36 a | 7.68 ± 0.35 a |
| Max temperature of warmest month (°C) | 18.71 ± 0.34 b | 26.4 ± 0.31 a | 19.37 ± 0.3 b |
| Min temperature of coldest month (°C) | −15.55 ± 0.44 c | −10.86 ± 0.59 b | −8.51 ± 0.46 a |
| Annual precipitation (mm) | 736.24 ± 19.35 b | 663.71 ± 23.42 c | 799.86 ± 17.46 a |
| Precipitation of wettest month (mm) | 135.6 ± 3.31 b | 139.24 ± 3.27 b | 190.57 ± 4.16 a |
| Precipitation of driest month (mm) | 3.67 ± 0.22 b | 6.46 ± 0.5 a | 3.07 ± 0.15 c |
Descriptive of current-year twigs and seedlings growth performance for Picea purpurea and its parental species. Significantly interspecific differences are indicated with different letters (P < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE.
| Species | Twigs diameter (mm2) | Twigs length (mm) | Seedlings diameter (mm2) | Seedlings height (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.64 ± 0.10 a | 36.73 ± 1.12 c | 190.94 ± 13.86 a | 32.29 ± 1.77 a |
|
| 1.66 ± 0.16 a | 53.63 ± 1.32 b | 158.41 ± 10.10 a | 30.20 ± 1.67 a |
|
| 1.59 ± 0.12 a | 61.73 ± 3.58 a | 160.79 ± 24.75 a | 38.00 ± 4.77 a |
Comparison of P-V and PLC parameters between Picea purpurea and its parental species. Significant interspecies differences are indicated with different letters (P < 0.05). Data are presented as means ± SE (n = 5).
| Symbol |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf P-V parameters | |||
| SWC | 1.26 ± 0.02 b | 1.46 ± 0.01 a | 1.50 ± 0.04 a |
| Πo (MPa) | −2.05 ± 0.06 c | −1.40 ± 0.10 a | −1.71 ± 0.10 b |
| ΨTLP (MPa) | −2.68 ± 0.09 b | −2.12 ± 0.04 a | −2.26 ± 0.12 a |
| RWCTLP (%) | 85.97 ± 1.21 a | 87.66 ± 0.55 a | 87.69 ± 1.75 a |
| | 15.29 ± 0.61 a | 12.59 ± 0.97 a | 14.41 ± 1.27 a |
| | 0.05 ± 0.002 a | 0.05 ± 0.002 a | 0.05 ± 0.005 a |
| PLC parameters | |||
| Leaf Ψ12 (MPa) | −1.06 ± 0.25 a | −1.05 ± 0.15 a | −0.79 ± 0.18 a |
| Leaf Ψ50 (MPa) | −2.12 ± 0.15 b | −2.04 ± 0.19 b | −1.31 ± 0.19 a |
| Leaf Ψ88 (MPa) | −3.18 ± 0.27 b | −3.03 ± 0.24 b | −1.82 ± 0.26 a |
| Leaf | 1.28 ± 0.24 a | 1.03 ± 0.25 a | 1.33 ± 0.30 a |
| Leaf Ψmid (MPa) | −0.93 ± 0.02 a | −0.99 ± 0.04 a | −0.83 ± 0.08 a |
| Stem Ψ12 (MPa) | −2.12 ± 0.29 c | −1.38 ± 0.15 b | −0.26 ± 0.17 a |
| Stem Ψ50 (MPa) | −2.78 ± 0.1 b | −2.79 ± 0.1 b | −1.77 ± 0.13 a |
| Stem Ψ88 (MPa) | −3.46 ± 0.35 a | −4.02 ± 0.09 a | −3.27 ± 0.08 a |
| Stem | 8.21 ± 0.12 c | 15.51 ± 0.64 b | 27.23 ± 1.08 a |
| Leaf Ψ50 − Stem Ψ50 (MPa) | 0.67 ± 0.15 a | 0.66 ± 0.19 a | 0.45 ± 0.19 a |
| Leaf Ψmid − Leaf Ψ50 (MPa) | 1.19 ± 0.02 a | 1.05 ± 0.05 a | 0.48 ± 0.09 b |
Figure 1.Percent loss of conductance versus water potential (Ψ) for leaves (A) and stems (B) of Picea purpurea, P. wilsonii and P. likiangensis (represented by triangles, circles and squares, respectively). Curves were fit using all data. Data points are presented as means ± SE.
Figure 2.Chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) after different temperature treatments for three Picea species (A). The temperatures causing a 50 % reduction in initial Fv/Fm (FT50) of three Picea species are shown in the inset (B). Significant interspecies differences are indicated with different letters (P < 0.05). Data points are presented as means ± SE (n = 4).