Literature DB >> 30310496

Renal Denervation After Symplicity HTN-3 - Back to Basics. Review of the Evidence.

Alexandre Persu1,2, Fadl Elmula M Fadl Elmula3,4, Yu Jin5, Ingrid Os3,4, Sverre E Kjeldsen3,4, Jan A Staessen5,6.   

Abstract

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been proposed as a new treatment modality in patients with apparent treatment resistant hypertension, a condition defined as office blood pressure elevation despite prescription of at least three antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. However, the impressive fall in blood pressure reported after RDN in Symplicity HTN-2, the first randomised study, and multiple observational studies has not been confirmed in the US sham-controlled trial Symplicity HTN-3 and four subsequent prospective randomised studies, all published or presented in 2014. The blood pressure reduction documented in earlier studies may be largely due to non-specific effects such as improvement of drug adherence in initially poorly adherent patients (Hawthorne effect), placebo effect and regression to the mean. The overall blood pressure lowering effect of RDN seems rather limited and the characteristics of true responders remain largely unknown. Accordingly, RDN is not ready for clinical practice. In most patients with apparent drug-resistant hypertension, drug monitoring and subsequent improvement of drug adherence may prove more effective and cost-beneficial to achieve blood pressure control. In the meantime, research should aim at identifying characteristics of those few patients adherent to drug treatment and with true resistant hypertension who may respond to RDN.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hawthorne effect; Resistant hypertension; ambulatory blood pressure; drug adherence; drug monitoring; regression to the mean; renal denervation; white coat effect

Year:  2014        PMID: 30310496      PMCID: PMC6159409          DOI: 10.15420/ecr.2014.9.2.110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cardiol        ISSN: 1758-3756


  53 in total

1.  An algorithm for the management of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  R W Gifford
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Eligibility for renal denervation: experience at 11 European expert centers.

Authors:  Alexandre Persu; Yu Jin; Marie Baelen; Eva Vink; Willemien L Verloop; Bernhard Schmidt; Marie K Blicher; Francesca Severino; Grégoire Wuerzner; Alison Taylor; Antoinette Pechère-Bertschi; Fadi Jokhaji; Fadl Elmula M Fadl Elmula; Jan Rosa; Danuta Czarnecka; Georg Ehret; Thomas Kahan; Jean Renkin; Jiři Widimsky; Lotte Jacobs; Wilko Spiering; Michel Burnier; Patrick B Mark; Jan Menne; Michael H Olsen; Peter J Blankestijn; Sverre Kjeldsen; Michiel L Bots; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Renal denervation in moderate treatment-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Christian Ott; Felix Mahfoud; Axel Schmid; Tilmann Ditting; Paul A Sobotka; Roland Veelken; Aline Spies; Christian Ukena; Ulrich Laufs; Michael Uder; Michael Böhm; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Difficult-to-control arterial hypertension or uncooperative patients? The assessment of serum antihypertensive drug levels to differentiate non-responsiveness from non-adherence to recommended therapy.

Authors:  Jiri Ceral; Vilma Habrdova; Viktor Vorisek; Marcel Bima; Radek Pelouch; Miroslav Solar
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.872

6.  Percutaneous renal denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension: final 3-year report of the Symplicity HTN-1 study.

Authors:  Henry Krum; Markus P Schlaich; Paul A Sobotka; Michael Böhm; Felix Mahfoud; Krishna Rocha-Singh; Richard Katholi; Murray D Esler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Diagnostic thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring based on 10-year cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Masahiro Kikuya; Tine W Hansen; Lutgarde Thijs; Kristina Björklund-Bodegård; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Tom Richart; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Lind; Hans Ibsen; Yutaka Imai; Jan A Staessen
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.444

8.  Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial.

Authors:  Stevo Julius; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael Weber; Hans R Brunner; Steffan Ekman; Lennart Hansson; Tsushung Hua; John Laragh; Gordon T McInnes; Lada Mitchell; Francis Plat; Anthony Schork; Beverly Smith; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Treatment of mild hypertension: a five year controlled drug trial. The Oslo study.

Authors:  A Helgeland
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Prognostic influence of office and ambulatory blood pressures in resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Gil F Salles; Claudia R L Cardoso; Elizabeth S Muxfeldt
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Acute and Short-Term Autonomic and Hemodynamic Responses to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.

Authors:  Bruno Rodrigues; Catarina A Barboza; Eliezer G Moura; Gabriela Ministro; Silvia E Ferreira-Melo; Javier B Castaño; Wilton M S Nunes; Cristiano Mostarda; Antonio Coca; Lauro C Vianna; Heitor Moreno-Junior
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.