Literature DB >> 30310387

Corrigendum: Low-Light Dependence of the Magnetic Field Effect on Cryptochromes: Possible Relevance to Plant Ecology.

Jacques Vanderstraeten1, Philippe Gailly2, E Pascal Malkemper3,4.   

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00121.].

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; clock proteins; geomagnetic field; light intensity; magnetoreception; plant growth; static magnetic fields

Year:  2018        PMID: 30310387      PMCID: PMC6173225          DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Plant Sci        ISSN: 1664-462X            Impact factor:   5.753


In the original article, there was an error. The definition of (x) (Equation 6) requires additional clarification, particularly the approach used to calculate Δ[Cry*]/Δk. A correction has been made to the section LIGHT INTENSITY-DEPENDENCE OF THE MF EFFECT ON PLANTS, subsections I-Dependence of the MF Effect on Cry, and I-Dependence of the MF Effect on Cry Signaling State, Paragraph 3. “… where (x) gives the solution for Δ[B]eq/Δk (Δ[Cry*]/Δk1) according to log (k/k) for the case where Δk (Δk1) = 20%, that is within the range of values possibly caused by the GMF, i.e., 1–50% (Maeda et al., 2012; Kattnig et al., 2016). Note (x) remains similar within that range. For Δk = 1 or 50%, it is, respectively, slightly shifted to the right (centered at x ~ 0) or to the left (centered at x = −0.5), and its slope remains similar. Δ[Cry*]/Δk1 is then calculated for different I and T values, with x = log (k1/k2 + k1) at each respective values.” The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  2 in total

1.  Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chemical amplification of magnetic field effects relevant to avian magnetoreception.

Authors:  Daniel R Kattnig; Emrys W Evans; Victoire Déjean; Charlotte A Dodson; Mark I Wallace; Stuart R Mackenzie; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 24.427

  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Differential root and shoot magnetoresponses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ivan A Paponov; Judith Fliegmann; Ravishankar Narayana; Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.