Literature DB >> 30309674

Emergency department use is high after esophagectomy and feeding tube problems are the biggest culprit.

Biniam Kidane1, Suha Kaaki2, Dhruvin H Hirpara3, Yu Cindy Shen3, Adam Bassili3, Frances Allison4, Thomas K Waddell5, Gail E Darling5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Esophagectomy is a complex operation with potential for prolonged recovery. We aimed to identify the incidence of and risk factors for any and frequent emergency department visits within 1 year of esophagectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed looking at consecutive esophagectomies at a tertiary Canadian center (1999-2014). Multivariable analyses identified factors associated with any emergency department visits and frequent emergency department use (≥3 visits) within 1 year postesophagectomy.
RESULTS: There were 520 esophagectomies with in-hospital mortality of 6% (n = 31). Of those discharged, 29.7% (n = 145) had ≥ 1 emergency department visit. Most common causes were feeding tube problems (39.3%; n = 57) and dysphagia/stricture (13.1%; n = 19). Higher income (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.42 per $10,000) and use of hybrid/minimally invasive esophagectomy (aOR, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.71-6.11) were independently associated with having emergency department visits. Patients with hybrid/minimally invasive esophagectomy were discharged earlier than others (P < .0001). Living outside of our metropolitan area (aOR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.27-0.49) and having surgery in the later years of the study period (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97; P = .006) were both independently associated with lower odds of emergency department visits. Forty-three patients (8.8%) were frequent emergency department users, with the most common causes of repeat emergency visits being feeding tube problems. Living outside of our metropolitan area was associated with lower odds of frequent emergency visits (aOR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.45).
CONCLUSIONS: There is high emergency department use within 1 year postesophagectomy. Patients living farther away from our hospital had a lower rate of emergency department use. It is possible that they are utilizing emergency departments nearer to home; this needs further study. Feeding tube problems are the biggest culprits and are potentially modifiable.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cancer; esophageal surgery; healthcare utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30309674     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.07.100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  3 in total

1.  Utility of feeding jejunostomy in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy with a high risk of anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Weitao Zhuang; Hansheng Wu; Huiling Liu; Shujie Huang; Yinghong Wu; Cheng Deng; Dan Tian; Zihao Zhou; Ruiqing Shi; Gang Chen; Guillaume Piessen; Puja G Khaitan; Kazuo Koyanagi; Soji Ozawa; Guibin Qiao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-04

2.  A refined procedure for esophageal resection using a full minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Simon K Ashiku; Ashish R Patel; Brandon H Horton; Jeffrey Velotta; Sora Ely; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 3.  Optimal timing and route of nutritional support after esophagectomy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Richard Zheng; Courtney L Devin; Michael J Pucci; Adam C Berger; Ernest L Rosato; Francesco Palazzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.