| Literature DB >> 30309024 |
Nicla Vicinanza1, Ingeborg-Helene Svenum2, Thijs Peters3, Rune Bredesen4, Hilde Venvik5.
Abstract
Sputtered Pd77%Ag23% membranes of thickness 2.2⁻8.5 µm were subjected to a three-step heat treatment in air (HTA) to investigate the relation between thickness and the reported beneficial effects of HTA on hydrogen transport. The permeability experiments were complimented by volumetric hydrogen sorption measurements and atomic force microscopy (AFM) imaging in order to relate the observed effects to changes in hydrogen solubility and/or structure. The results show that the HTA-essentially an oxidation-reduction cycle-mainly affects the thinner membranes, with the hydrogen flux increasing stepwise upon HTA of each membrane side. The hydrogen solubility is found to remain constant upon HTA, and the change must therefore be attributed to improved transport kinetics. The HTA procedure appears to shift the transition from the surface to bulk-limited transport to lower thickness, roughly from ~5 to ≤2.2 µm under the conditions applied here. Although the surface topography results indicate that HTA influences the surface roughness and increases the effective membrane surface area, this cannot be the sole explanation for the observed hydrogen flux increase. This is because considerable surface roughening occurs during hydrogen permeation (no HTA) as well, but not accompanied by the same hydrogen flux enhancement. The latter effect is particularly pronounced for thinner membranes, implying that the structural changes may be dependent on the magnitude of the hydrogen flux.Entities:
Keywords: Pd-Ag membranes; heat treatment; hydrogen permeation; solubility; surface characterization
Year: 2018 PMID: 30309024 PMCID: PMC6315426 DOI: 10.3390/membranes8040092
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Membranes (Basel) ISSN: 2077-0375
Figure 1Sketch of the microchannel reactor configuration.
Figure 2Measured hydrogen permeance as function of inverse thickness at 300 °C for membranes not subjected to HTA. The full line refers to values of permeance reported if bulk is the rate limiting step (1.5 × 10−8·mol·s−1·m−2·Pa−0.5) [5].
Figure 3Permeance measured at 300 °C for each single step of heat treatment in air; (a) as function of inverse thickness for the main HTA membrane side sequence with the full line indicating a permeability of 2.1 × 10−8 mol·s−1·m−2·Pa−0.5, and (b) as function of the difference in the square root of the hydrogen partial pressure for the HTA2 membrane side sequence applied to a 2.2 µm thick membrane.
Permeability measured at 300 °C after before, between and after each of the three steps in the main HTA membrane side sequences for the 2.2 µm thick membranes.
| T (°C) | Permeability 108 (mol·m·m−2·s−1·Pa−0.5) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main HTA Sequence | HTA2 Sequence | |||||||
| Before | Feed | Perm | Both | Before | Feed | Perm | Both | |
| 300 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
| 350 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
| 400 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 2.7 | 2.7 |
Sieverts’ constant measured at different temperature for 2.2 µm and 8.5 µm thick membranes before and after heat treatment in air.
| Sample Thickness (µm) | Temperature (°C) | Sieverts’ Constant (µmol/g·Pa0.5) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before HTA | After HTA | ||
| 8.5 | 300 | 0.77 | 0.79 |
| 350 | 0.53 | 0.63 | |
| 400 | 0.44 | 0.45 | |
| 2.2 | 300 | 0.82 | 0.81 |
| 350 | 0.57 | 0.60 | |
| 400 | 0.47 | 0.47 | |
Figure 4Arrhenius plot of the diffusivity for 2.2 µm and 8.5 µm thick membranes before and after HTA of both sides for the temperature range 300–400 °C. The diffusivity scale is presented in logarithmic form and the dotted lines are linear fits.
Estimated values of the pre-exponential factor (D0) and of the activation energy (E) for 2.2 µm and 8.5 µm thick membranes before and after the main HTA sequence.
| Sample Thickness (µm) | Before HTA | After HTA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.2 | 4.9 × 10−7 | 29 | 3.6 × 10−7 | 24 |
| 8.5 | 1.5 × 10−7 | 20 | 1.7 × 10−7 | 20 |
Figure 5AFM images of the 2.2 µm thick membrane for the feed/growth side (left panel) and permeate/substrate side (right panel) for (a) as-grown; (b) hydrogen stabilized; and (c) HTA-subjected samples. Image areas: (a) right: 1 × 1 µm2; rest: 5 × 5 µm2.
Figure 6AFM images of the 8.5 µm thick membrane for the feed/growth side (left panel) and permeated/substrate side (right panel) for (a) as-grown; (b) hydrogen stabilized; and (c) HTA-subjected samples. Image areas: (a) right and (b) right: 1 × 1 µm2; rest: 5 × 5 µm2.
Surface roughness for as-grown membranes, after hydrogen stabilization and HTA with subsequent hydrogen stabilization obtained from AFM imaging analysis for both the growth/feed and substrate/permeate side. The analyzed areas are based on (5 × 5) µm2 images except for the substrate/permeate side as-grown membranes where images with an area of (1 × 1) µm2 are used.
| Membrane Thickness (µm) | Roughness (nm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As-Grown | Hydrogen Stabilization | HTA | ||||
| Growth/Feed | Substrate/Permeate | Growth/Feed | Substrate/Permeate | Growth/Feed | Substrate/Permeate | |
| 2.2 | 8.4 ± 0.3 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 13.8 ± 0.8 | 12.3 ± 0.6 | 20.3 ± 1.3 | 11.6 ± 0.6 |
| 4.7 | 10.7 ± 0.6 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 18.2 ± 0.7 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 24.6 ± 1.6 | 9.0 ± 0.2 |
| 6.9 | 11.8 ± 1.6 | 0.38 ± 0.04 | 12.0 ± 0.7 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | - | - |
| 8.5 | 10.2 ± 0.6 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 24.0 ± 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.07 | 26.9 ± 2.8 | 14.3 ± 0.6 |
| 11.2 | 13.2 ± 2.3 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 20.2 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | - | - |