| Literature DB >> 30309010 |
Yeong-Jun Song1, Hae-Kwan Cheong2, Myung Ki3, Ji-Yeon Shin4, Seung-Sik Hwang5, Mira Park6, Moran Ki7, Jiseun Lim8.
Abstract
Research has shown the effects of climatic factors on shigellosis; however, no previous study has evaluated climatic effects in regions with a winter seasonality of shigellosis incidence. We examined the effects of temperature and precipitation on shigellosis incidence in Korea from 2002⁻2010. The incidence of shigellosis was calculated based on data from the Korean Center for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC, Cheongju, Korea), and a generalized additive model (GAM) was used to analyze the associations between the incidence and climatic factors. The annual incidence rate of shigellosis was 7.9 cases/million persons from 2002⁻2010. During 2007⁻2010, high incidence rates and winter seasonality were observed among those aged ≥65 years, but not among lower age groups. Based on the GAM model, the incidence of shigellosis is expected to increase by 13.6% and 2.9% with a temperature increase of 1 °C and a lag of two weeks and with a mean precipitation increase of 1 mm and a lag of five weeks after adjustment for seasonality, respectively. This study suggests that the incidence of shigellosis will increase with global climate change despite the winter seasonality of shigellosis in Korea. Public health action is needed to prevent the increase of shigellosis incidence associated with climate variations.Entities:
Keywords: infectious diarrheal disease; meteorological factors; seasonal variation; shigellosis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30309010 PMCID: PMC6210993 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Annual incidence rate (per million) of shigellosis by sex and age, 2002–2010.
| Year | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 15.73 | 23.00 | 9.57 | 5.61 | 7.55 | 1.83 | 2.98 | 2.92 | 2.49 | 7.90 |
| Sex | ||||||||||
| Men | 13.46 | 22.36 | 9.54 | 5.00 | 6.94 | 1.50 | 2.67 | 1.77 | 1.92 | 7.18 |
| Women | 18.02 | 23.64 | 9.60 | 6.22 | 8.16 | 2.16 | 3.29 | 4.08 | 3.05 | 8.62 |
| Age (years) | ||||||||||
| 0–2 | 15.04 | 26.99 | 5.42 | 7.11 | 8.87 | 0.00 | 3.66 | 2.17 | 1.46 | 8.37 |
| 3–6 | 56.59 | 113.55 | 12.72 | 13.83 | 36.90 | 3.80 | 4.09 | 3.21 | 3.79 | 30.84 |
| 7–17 | 24.36 | 45.10 | 28.44 | 4.83 | 8.18 | 0.94 | 2.56 | 1.51 | 0.85 | 13.02 |
| 18–64 | 9.52 | 10.11 | 5.11 | 3.97 | 5.24 | 1.52 | 1.72 | 2.18 | 1.93 | 4.55 |
| ≥65 | 24.56 | 28.09 | 10.96 | 14.68 | 8.56 | 5.10 | 11.48 | 9.87 | 8.04 | 12.78 |
Figure 1Annual incidence rate (per million) of shigellosis by age, 2002–2010.
Associations between shigellosis incidence and climatic factors.
| Climatic Factors | Time-Point | Relative Risk | 95% Confidence Interval | Change (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximum temperature | Present | 1.100 | 1.060 | 1.140 | 10.0 | <0.001 |
| Lag 1 | 1.128 | 1.085 | 1.171 | 12.8 | <0.001 | |
| Lag 2 | 1.136 | 1.092 | 1.180 | 13.6 | <0.001 | |
| Lag 3 | 1.106 | 1.063 | 1.149 | 10.6 | <0.001 | |
| Lag 4 | 1.098 | 1.057 | 1.139 | 9.8 | <0.001 | |
| Lag 5 | 1.076 | 1.033 | 1.119 | 7.6 | <0.001 | |
| Lag 6 | 1.080 | 1.038 | 1.122 | 8.0 | <0.001 | |
| Daily precipitation | Present | 1.025 | 1.003 | 1.047 | 2.5 | 0.030 |
| Lag 1 | 1.021 | 0.997 | 1.045 | 2.1 | 0.094 | |
| Lag 2 | 1.020 | 0.996 | 1.045 | 2.0 | 0.110 | |
| Lag 3 | 1.012 | 0.987 | 1.038 | 1.2 | 0.342 | |
| Lag 4 | 1.026 | 1.003 | 1.049 | 2.6 | 0.026 | |
| Lag 5 | 1.029 | 1.005 | 1.052 | 2.9 | 0.018 | |
| Lag 6 | 1.029 | 1.004 | 1.054 | 2.9 | 0.026 | |
Note: Statistical analyses were conducted using the generalized additive model and seasonality was corrected by spline functions. When the effect of temperature was primarily examined, corrections for precipitation were made, and when the effect of precipitation was primarily examined, corrections for temperature were made.
Figure 2Smoothing plots of (a) the weekly maximum temperature and (b) mean precipitation and their relationships to shigellosis in Korea, 2002–2010. Note: The continuous line indicates the relative risk for shigellosis. The regions above and below the discontinuous lines indicate the confidence interval of the relative risk for shigellosis.
Associations between shigellosis incidence and climatic factors after seasonal stratification.
| Season | Time-Point | Maximum Temperature | Mean Precipitation | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR | 95% CI | Change (%) | RR | 95% CI | Change (%) | ||||||
| Spring | Present | 1.047 | 0.968 | 1.126 | 4.7 | 0.252 | 1.049 | 1.017 | 1.081 | 4.9 | 0.003 |
| Lag 1 | 1.044 | 0.969 | 1.119 | 4.4 | 0.259 | 1.046 | 1.010 | 1.083 | 4.6 | 0.016 | |
| Lag 2 | 1.161 | 1.078 | 1.245 | 16.1 | <0.001 | 1.084 | 1.047 | 1.121 | 8.4 | <0.001 | |
| Lag 3 | 1.122 | 1.050 | 1.194 | 12.2 | 0.002 | 1.082 | 1.032 | 1.133 | 8.2 | 0.002 | |
| Lag 4 | 1.070 | 0.999 | 1.141 | 7.0 | 0.063 | 1.037 | 0.975 | 1.099 | 3.7 | 0.252 | |
| Lag 5 | 1.023 | 0.949 | 1.098 | 2.3 | 0.544 | 1.041 | 0.979 | 1.103 | 4.1 | 0.206 | |
| Lag 6 | 1.048 | 0.973 | 1.123 | 4.8 | 0.224 | 1.066 | 0.996 | 1.135 | 6.6 | 0.072 | |
| Summer | Present | 0.997 | 0.877 | 1.116 | −0.3 | 0.955 | 1.000 | 0.978 | 1.022 | 0.0 | 0.989 |
| Lag 1 | 1.175 | 1.032 | 1.317 | 17.5 | 0.027 | 0.999 | 0.971 | 1.027 | −0.1 | 0.939 | |
| Lag 2 | 1.040 | 0.904 | 1.175 | 4.0 | 0.574 | 0.971 | 0.943 | 0.999 | −2.9 | 0.039 | |
| Lag 3 | 0.968 | 0.848 | 1.088 | −3.2 | 0.592 | 0.981 | 0.956 | 1.005 | −1.9 | 0.116 | |
| Lag 4 | 1.009 | 0.900 | 1.117 | 0.9 | 0.875 | 1.015 | 0.995 | 1.035 | 1.5 | 0.149 | |
| Lag 5 | 0.887 | 0.780 | 0.995 | −11.3 | 0.029 | 1.001 | 0.981 | 1.021 | 0.1 | 0.905 | |
| Lag 6 | 0.967 | 0.857 | 1.077 | −3.3 | 0.554 | 1.011 | 0.988 | 1.035 | 1.1 | 0.354 | |
| Autumn | Present | 1.067 | 0.974 | 1.160 | 6.7 | 0.174 | 1.118 | 1.031 | 1.204 | 11.8 | 0.012 |
| Lag 1 | 1.186 | 1.073 | 1.300 | 18.6 | 0.003 | 1.066 | 0.982 | 1.149 | 6.6 | 0.134 | |
| Lag 2 | 1.200 | 1.080 | 1.320 | 20.0 | 0.003 | 1.027 | 0.935 | 1.118 | 2.7 | 0.573 | |
| Lag 3 | 1.179 | 1.061 | 1.297 | 17.9 | 0.006 | 0.994 | 0.906 | 1.082 | −0.6 | 0.892 | |
| Lag 4 | 1.177 | 1.048 | 1.306 | 17.7 | 0.013 | 1.069 | 1.011 | 1.126 | 6.9 | 0.024 | |
| Lag 5 | 1.183 | 1.041 | 1.324 | 18.3 | 0.020 | 1.030 | 0.974 | 1.087 | 3.0 | 0.301 | |
| Lag 6 | 1.149 | 1.006 | 1.292 | 14.9 | 0.058 | 1.007 | 0.956 | 1.058 | 0.7 | 0.785 | |
| Winter | Present | 1.098 | 1.051 | 1.145 | 9.8 | <0.001 | 1.071 | 0.977 | 1.165 | 7.1 | 0.152 |
| Lag 1 | 1.156 | 1.108 | 1.205 | 15.6 | <0.001 | 1.074 | 0.974 | 1.175 | 7.4 | 0.163 | |
| Lag 2 | 1.167 | 1.120 | 1.214 | 16.7 | <0.001 | 1.018 | 0.917 | 1.119 | 1.8 | 0.727 | |
| Lag 3 | 1.122 | 1.075 | 1.169 | 12.2 | <0.001 | 1.039 | 0.939 | 1.140 | 3.9 | 0.453 | |
| Lag 4 | 1.174 | 1.126 | 1.222 | 17.4 | <0.001 | 0.847 | 0.736 | 0.958 | −15.3 | 0.003 | |
| Lag 5 | 1.138 | 1.085 | 1.191 | 13.8 | <0.001 | 0.982 | 0.880 | 1.085 | −1.8 | 0.735 | |
| Lag 6 | 1.108 | 1.059 | 1.157 | 10.8 | <0.001 | 0.991 | 0.888 | 1.093 | −0.9 | 0.856 | |
Note: RR: relative risk; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. Statistical analyses were conducted using the generalized additive model and seasonality was corrected by spline functions. When the effect of temperature was primarily examined, corrections for precipitation were made, and when the effect of precipitation was primarily examined, corrections for temperature were made.