| Literature DB >> 30307902 |
Chun-Ling Han1, Suo-Lin Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kawasaki disease (KD) is a serious disease characterized by systemic lesions of the skin and mucous membranes, as well as lymphomas and vascular inflammation. KD threatens the health and lives of children, especially young ones. Here, we compared the therapeutic effects of single intravenous immunoglobulin gamma (IVIG) vs. a combination of IVIG and infliximab in young children with Kawasaki disease (KD). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 154 children with KD, younger than 5 years old, were enrolled in the study from January 2013 to January 2017. The patients were randomly divided into an IVIG group and a combination of IVIG and infliximab treatment group. After systematic treatments, the therapeutic indicators of the 2 groups were compared. During the treatment process, body temperature and other important inflammatory indicators, including C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), were monitored in the first 4 days. RESULTS There were fewer refractory KD patients in the combined treatment group than in the IVIG group (4 vs. 14, p<0.001). KD patients in the combined treatment group had better outcomes with shorter fever durations and hospital stays, as well as less coronary artery dilation. However, there was no obvious differences in the incidence rate of coronary artery aneurysms between the 2 groups (p>0.05). Costs of administration were similar between groups (p>0.05). Body temperature, CRP, WBC, and TNF-α in the combined therapy group all showed an earlier drop than in the IVIG group, indicating a more effective anti-inflammation effect. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of IVIG combined with infliximab in the treatment of young children with KD has more advantages than single IVIG therapy and can be considered as a preferred treatment for KD. However, it would be necessary to further investigate whether there is a significant difference in aneurysm frequency and long-term outcome between these 2 strategies among a larger number of patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30307902 PMCID: PMC6194751 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.908678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patient populations.
| IVIG (n=77) | IVIG and infliximab (n=77) | |
|---|---|---|
| Median age, years (range) | 2.3 (0.5–4.5) | 2.1 (0.5–4.7) |
| Males (%) | 28 (18.18%) | 34 (22.08%) |
| Weight, kg (range) | 8.34 (4.12–22.35) | 8.16 (4.18–22.10) |
| Body temperature at admission, °C | 38.7 (37.5–39.4) | 38.9 (37.8–40.2) |
| Time from fever onset to diagnosis, days | 3.2 (1–7) | 3.5 (2–8) |
| Hematologic examination | ||
| WBC (×103/μL) | 12.7 (8.9–18.9) | 14.1 (9.1–19.2) |
| ANC (/μL) | 8554 (4758–17568) | 10286 (5472–18754) |
| ESR (mm/h) | 61 (30–138) | 65 (33–118) |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 8.0 (4.9–29.8) | 8.5 (4.3–33.5) |
| CA status | ||
| Aneurysm | 2 | 1 |
| Dilated | 13 | 11 |
| Normal | 62 | 65 |
ANC – absolute neutrophil count; CA – coronary artery; CRP – C-reactive protein; ESR – erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IVIG – intravenous immunoglobulin; WBC – white blood cell count.
Comparisons of clinical symptoms before and after IVIG or combination of IVIG and infliximab treatments.
| Symptoms | IVIG | IVGI & infliximab | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After (48 h) | Before | After (48 h) | |
| Cases (%) | Cases (%) | Cases (%) | Cases (%) | |
| Fever | 75 (97.40%) | 41 (53.25%) | 77 (100%) | 19 (24.68%) |
| Conjunctival injection | 66 (85.71%) | 29 (37.66%) | 61 (79.22%) | 22 (28.57%) |
| Changes in lip and oral cavity | 69 (89.61) | 38 (49.35%) | 66 (85.71%) | 21 (27.27%) |
| Cervical lymphadenopathy | 57 (74.03%) | 28 (36.36%) | 62 (80.52%) | 16 (20.78%) |
| Polymorphous exanthema | 43 (55.84%) | 18 (23.38%) | 35 (45.45%) | 9 (11.69) |
Figure 1Symptom improvements after different treatments (** p<0.001).
Figure 2Comparisons of indicators after IVIG or combination of IVIG and infliximab treatments. (A) Therapeutic effect indicator: duration of fever, length of hospital stay, and occurrence rate of refractory KD. (B) Complications indictors: coronary artery (CA) dilation and CA aneurysms. (C) Economic indicator: hospitalization expenses.
Figure 3Monitoring of inflammatory indicators: temperature (A), CRP (B), WBC (C), and TNF-α (D) in KD children with different treatments in the first 4 days (CRP, C-reactive protein; WBC, white blood cell count).
Figure 4Monitoring of other indicators containing ALB (A), platelets (B), Hb (C), and ALT (D) in KD children with different treatments in the first 4 days.