Literature DB >> 30307462

Performance Evaluation and Measurement Uncertainty Determination of the New Version of the Abbott ARCHITECT 25-OH Vitamin D 5P02 Assay.

Yong Kwan Lim1,2, Ae Ja Park2, Oh Joo Kweon2,3, Jee-Hye Choi2.   

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated performance and measurement uncertainty of the newly released ARCHITECT 25-OH vitamin D 5P02 assay (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL).
Methods: In total, 300 samples were used to compare the results from ELECSYS Vitamin D Total (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total (Siemens, Tarrytown, NY). To quantify the measurement uncertainty, 25 samples and four levels of standard reference material (SRM) were measured using isotope dilution-liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry according to international guidelines.
Results: The results of the ARCHITECT assay were equivalent to other immunoassays, but correlation coefficients were lower than the recommended criterion. SRM level 2 was considered adequate for uncertainty estimation, and the expanded measurement uncertainty of the ARCHITECT assay was 4.2%, which was superior to the other two assays. Conclusions: The restandardized ARCHITECT assay has acceptable performance in a clinical setting. However, there is still a need for further standardization of total vitamin D measurement among the automated immunoassays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30307462     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  4 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) Intercomparison Study 2 - Part 1 liquid chromatography - tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays - impact of 3-epi-25-hydroxyvitamin D3 on assay performance.

Authors:  Stephen A Wise; Johanna E Camara; Carolyn Q Burdette; Grace Hahm; Federica Nalin; Adam J Kuszak; Joyce Merkel; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Emma L Williams; Andrew N Hoofnagle; Fiona Ivison; Ralf Fischer; Jody M W van den Ouweland; Chung S Ho; Emmett W K Law; Jean-Nicolas Simard; Renaud Gonthier; Brett Holmquist; Sarah Meadows; Lorna Cox; Kimberly Robyak; Michael H Creer; Robert Fitzgerald; Michael W Clarke; Norma Breen; Pierre Lukas; Étienne Cavalier; Christopher T Sempos
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Interlaboratory comparison of 25-hydroxyvitamin D assays: Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) Intercomparison Study 2 - Part 2 ligand binding assays - impact of 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 and 24R,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on assay performance.

Authors:  Stephen A Wise; Johanna E Camara; Carolyn Q Burdette; Grace Hahm; Federica Nalin; Adam J Kuszak; Joyce Merkel; Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu; Emma L Williams; Christian Popp; Christian Beckert; Jan Schultess; Glen Van Slooten; Carole Tourneur; Camille Pease; Ravi Kaul; Alfredo Villarreal; Marcelo Cidade Batista; Heather Pham; Alex Bennett; Eugene Jansen; Dilshad Ahmed Khan; Mark Kilbane; Patrick J Twomey; James Freeman; Neil Parker; Sohail Mushtaq; Christine Simpson; Pierre Lukas; Étienne Cavalier; Christopher T Sempos
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Recent Information on Vitamin D Deficiency in an Adult Korean Population Visiting Local Clinics and Hospitals.

Authors:  Rihwa Choi; Sung-Eun Cho; Sang Gon Lee; Eun Hee Lee
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 4.  Vitamin D testing: advantages and limits of the current assays.

Authors:  Barbara Altieri; Etienne Cavalier; Harjit Pal Bhattoa; Faustino R Pérez-López; María T López-Baena; Gonzalo R Pérez-Roncero; Peter Chedraui; Cedric Annweiler; Silvia Della Casa; Sieglinde Zelzer; Markus Herrmann; Antongiulio Faggiano; Annamaria Colao; Michael F Holick
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 4.016

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.