Literature DB >> 30306839

Validity and reliability of a novel optoelectronic device to measure movement velocity, force and power during the back squat exercise.

Roberto Laza-Cagigas1, Mark Goss-Sampson1, Eneko Larumbe-Zabala2, Leke Termkolli1, Fernando Naclerio1.   

Abstract

This study analysed the validity and reliability of a new optoelectronic device (Velowin) for the measurement of vertical displacement and velocity as well as to estimate force and mechanical power. Eleven trained males with Mean (SD) age = 27.4 (4.8) years, completed an incremental squat exercise test with 5 different loads (<30-90% of their 1-repetition maximum) while displacement and vertical velocity of the barbell were simultaneously measured using an integrated 3D system (3D motion capture system + force platform) and Velowin. Substantial to almost perfect correlation (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.75-0.96), root mean square error as coefficient of variation ±90% confidence interval ≤10% and good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.84-0.99 were determined for all the variables. Passing and Bablock regression methods revealed no differences for average velocity. However, significant but consistent bias were determined for average or peak force and power while systematic and not proportional bias was found for displacement. In conclusion, Velowin, in holds of some potential advantages over traditionally used accelerometer or linear transducers, represents a valid and reliable alternative to monitor vertical displacement and velocity as well as to estimate average force and mechanical power during the squat exercise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3­D motion captures systems; Resistance training; accelerometers; force plate; linear transducers

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30306839     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  4 in total

1.  The Validity and Reliability of Commercially Available Resistance Training Monitoring Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jonathon Weakley; Matthew Morrison; Amador García-Ramos; Rich Johnston; Lachlan James; Michael H Cole
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  An Optoelectronic System for Measuring the Range of Motion in Healthy Volunteers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Francesc Medina-Mirapeix; Rodrigo Martín-San Agustín; Germán Cánovas-Ambit; José A García-Vidal; Mariano Gacto-Sánchez; Pilar Escolar-Reina
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Validity and Reliability of Mobile Applications for Assessing Strength, Power, Velocity, and Change-of-Direction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rui Silva; Markel Rico-González; Ricardo Lima; Zeki Akyildiz; José Pino-Ortega; Filipe Manuel Clemente
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Effectiveness of combining microcurrent with resistance training in trained males.

Authors:  Fernando Naclerio; Marcos Seijo; Bettina Karsten; George Brooker; Leandro Carbone; Jack Thirkell; Eneko Larumbe-Zabala
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.