| Literature DB >> 30306435 |
Christy Newman1, Shana Hughes2, Asha Persson3, Hong-Ha M Truong2, Martin Holt3.
Abstract
As evidence of the safety and effectiveness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has grown, so has attention to the views of prospective users and providers. However, far less attention has been paid to understanding the perspectives of other stakeholders in the rollout of PrEP access programs. We conducted 21 semi-structured qualitative interviews in 2017 with key stakeholders working across the policy, advocacy, research and/or clinical dimensions of the Australian HIV response, before federal support for a subsidised access scheme was achieved. Our analysis explored three areas of shared concern: who is a suitable candidate for PrEP; why are disparities in PrEP access important; and how can disparities be addressed? In examining how this diverse group of professionals grappled with the challenges of promoting 'equitable access' to PrEP in an increasingly resource rationed health system, we can see how the principles believed to underpin the Australian response to HIV were both reaffirmed and challenged through this period of significant change.Keywords: Access; Australia; Equity; HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP); Qualitative research
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30306435 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-018-2311-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Behav ISSN: 1090-7165