Literature DB >> 30306346

Challenges in implementing best practice DVI guidelines in low resource settings: lessons learnt from the Meethotamulla garbage dump mass disaster.

Sameera A Gunawardena1, Ravindra Samaranayake2, Vianney Dias2, Selliah Pranavan2, Asela Mendis2, Jean Perera2.   

Abstract

The management of mass fatalities following disasters is a complex process which requires the involvement of multiple stakeholders and resources. A garbage dump at Meethotamulla in Sri Lanka suddenly collapsed, resulting in the death of 32 individuals. Efforts to implement best practice guidelines in Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) during this disaster revealed several important aspects that need to be considered by the forensic community. Delays in initiating the legal processes to investigate and manage the incident resulted in public dissatisfaction towards the post-disaster management process. Body recovery by Police and military personnel without the involvement of medical teams had numerous shortcomings including the lack of proper tagging and photography, commingling of body parts, and non-preservation of personal items. Public expectation and demand for early release of the bodies conflicted with the necessity to undergo a stringent DVI process according to best practice guidelines. Many adaptations and alternate strategies were necessary to ensure that DVI could be done scientifically. The use of primary identification markers including odontology and DNA had many limitations including non-availability of antemortem data, resource availability and cost. Identification was established using a combination of secondary identification markers including clothing, jewelry, scars, tattoos, morphological descriptions and circumstantial evidence. In two cases, odontological features further supported positive identification. Samples for DNA were obtained and preserved but were not utilized in establishing the identities. This paper highlights the need for better public awareness and multidisciplinary commitment in managing mass fatalities and also reflects on the challenges of implementing best practice DVI guidelines in low-resource settings with different legal and socio-cultural expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disaster management; Mass disaster planning and mitigation; Victim identification

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30306346     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-018-0033-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  21 in total

1.  International collaboration in mass disasters involving foreign nationals within the EU: medico-legal investigation of Finnish victims of the Milan Linate airport SAS SK 686 aircraft accident on 8 October 2001.

Authors:  P Lunetta; H Ranta; C Cattaneo; A Piccinini; R Niskanen; A Sajantila; A Penttilä
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Epidemics caused by dead bodies: a disaster myth that does not want to die.

Authors:  Claude de Ville de Goyet
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2004-05

3.  Assessment of DNA degradation and the genotyping success of highly degraded samples.

Authors:  Sheree R Hughes-Stamm; Kevin J Ashton; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  The current status of forensic science laboratory accreditation in Europe.

Authors:  Ekrem Malkoc; Wim Neuteboom
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Highly effective DNA extraction method for nuclear short tandem repeat testing of skeletal remains from mass graves.

Authors:  Jon Davoren; Daniel Vanek; Rijad Konjhodzić; John Crews; Edwin Huffine; Thomas J Parsons
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 6.  DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI).

Authors:  M Prinz; A Carracedo; W R Mayr; N Morling; T J Parsons; A Sajantila; R Scheithauer; H Schmitter; P M Schneider
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 4.882

7.  Potential problems arising during international disaster victim identification (DVI) exercises.

Authors:  Roger W Byard; Calle Winskog
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.007

8.  International standards in cases of mass Disaster Victim Identification (DVI).

Authors:  Rüdiger Lessig; Markus Rothschild
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-08-21       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 9.  Integrating forensic anthropology into Disaster Victim Identification.

Authors:  Amy Z Mundorff
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.007

10.  The strategies to DVI challenges in Typhoon Morakot.

Authors:  Chun-Yen Lin; Tsun-Ying Huang; Hsuan-Cheng Shih; Chiao-Hsuan Yuan; Liang-Ju Chen; Hua-Sheng Tsai; Chih-Hsin Pan; Hui-Ming Chiang; Hsin-Lin Liu; Wen-Chi Su; Kun-Tien Wu; Chi-Hsiang Chao; Nu-En Huang; Kun-Da Yang; Hsing-Mei Hsieh; Li-Chin Tsai; Adrian Linacre; Yu-Jen Yu; Yen-Yang Lin; Pao-Ching Chu; James Chun-I Lee
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.686

View more
  1 in total

1.  Application of the "bubbling" procedure to dead body portraits in forensic identification.

Authors:  Stefan Potente; Frank Ramsthaler; Mattias Kettner; Tomoya Ikeda; Peter Schmidt
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.