Literature DB >> 30306233

[Open vs. laparoscopic rectal resection-2-year results of the ACOSG Z6051 study].

M Schrempf, M Anthuber1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30306233     DOI： 10.1007/s00104-018-0747-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN： 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Megan Branda; Daniel J Sargent; Anne Marie Boller; Virgilio George; Maher Abbas; Walter R Peters; Dipen Maun; George Chang; Alan Herline; Alessandro Fichera; Matthew Mutch; Steven Wexner; Mark Whiteford; John Marks; Elisa Birnbaum; David Margolin; David Larson; Peter Marcello; Mitchell Posner; Thomas Read; John Monson; Sherry M Wren; Peter W T Pisters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Definition, reporting, and interpretation of composite outcomes in clinical trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Gloria Cordoba; Lisa Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Harold Bae; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.