Francesca Porcellati1, Paola Lucidi1, Paola Candeloro1, Patrizia Cioli1, Anna Marinelli Andreoli1, Gianluca Curti2, Geremia B Bolli3, Carmine G Fanelli1. 1. Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Perugia University School of Medicine, Perugia, Italy. 2. Section of Occupational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perugia University School of Medicine, Perugia, Italy. 3. Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Perugia University School of Medicine, Perugia, Italy geremia.bolli@unipg.it.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and endogenous (hepatic) glucose production (EGP) of clinical doses of glargine U300 (Gla-300) and glargine U100 (Gla-100) under steady-state (SS) conditions in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: T1DM subjects (N = 18, age 40 ±12 years, T1DM duration 26 ± 12 years, BMI 23.4 ± 2 kg/m2, A1C 7.19 ± 0.52% [55 ± 5.7 mmol · mol-1-1]) were studied after 3 months of Gla-300 or Gla-100 (evening dosing) titrated to fasting euglycemia (random, crossover) with the euglycemic clamp using individualized doses (Gla-300 0.35 ± 0.08, Gla-100 0.28 ± 0.07 units · kg-1). RESULTS:Plasma free insulin concentrations (free immunoreactive insulin area under the curve) were equivalent over 24 h with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 (point estimate 1.11 [90% CI 1.03; 1.20]) but were reduced in the first 6 h (0.91 [90% CI 0.86; 0.97]) and higher in the last 12 h postdosing (1.38 [90% CI 1.21; 1.56]). Gla-300 and Gla-100 both maintained 24 h euglycemia (0.99 [90% CI 0.98; 1.0]). The glucose infusion rate was equivalent over 24 h (1.03 [90% CI 0.88; 1.21]) but was lower in first (0.77 [90% CI 0.62; 0.95]) and higher (1.53 [90% CI 1.23; 1.92]) in the second 12 h with Gla-300 versus Gla-100. EGP was less suppressed during 0-6 h but more during 18-24 h with Gla-300. PK and PD within-day variability (fluctuation) was 50% and 17% lower with Gla-300. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized, clinical doses of Gla-300 and Gla-100 resulted in a similar euglycemic potential under SS conditions. However, Gla-300 exhibited a more stable profile, with lower variability and more physiological modulation of EGP compared with Gla-100.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and endogenous (hepatic) glucose production (EGP) of clinical doses of glargine U300 (Gla-300) and glargineU100 (Gla-100) under steady-state (SS) conditions in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: T1DM subjects (N = 18, age 40 ± 12 years, T1DM duration 26 ± 12 years, BMI 23.4 ± 2 kg/m2, A1C 7.19 ± 0.52% [55 ± 5.7 mmol · mol-1-1]) were studied after 3 months of Gla-300 or Gla-100 (evening dosing) titrated to fasting euglycemia (random, crossover) with the euglycemic clamp using individualized doses (Gla-300 0.35 ± 0.08, Gla-100 0.28 ± 0.07 units · kg-1). RESULTS: Plasma free insulin concentrations (free immunoreactive insulin area under the curve) were equivalent over 24 h with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 (point estimate 1.11 [90% CI 1.03; 1.20]) but were reduced in the first 6 h (0.91 [90% CI 0.86; 0.97]) and higher in the last 12 h postdosing (1.38 [90% CI 1.21; 1.56]). Gla-300 and Gla-100 both maintained 24 h euglycemia (0.99 [90% CI 0.98; 1.0]). The glucose infusion rate was equivalent over 24 h (1.03 [90% CI 0.88; 1.21]) but was lower in first (0.77 [90% CI 0.62; 0.95]) and higher (1.53 [90% CI 1.23; 1.92]) in the second 12 h with Gla-300 versus Gla-100. EGP was less suppressed during 0-6 h but more during 18-24 h with Gla-300. PK and PD within-day variability (fluctuation) was 50% and 17% lower with Gla-300. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized, clinical doses of Gla-300 and Gla-100 resulted in a similar euglycemic potential under SS conditions. However, Gla-300 exhibited a more stable profile, with lower variability and more physiological modulation of EGP compared with Gla-100.
Authors: Laura M Nally; Jennifer L Sherr; Michelle A Van Name; Anisha D Patel; William V Tamborlane Journal: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.045
Authors: Geremia B Bolli; Wolfgang Landgraf; Zsolt Bosnyak; Lydie Melas-Melt; Philip D Home Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2020-05-29 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: James Ling; Emily W M Poon; Aimin Yang; Theresa Yeung; Kitman Loo; Risa Ozaki; Ronald C W Ma; Andrea O Y Luk; Alice P S Kong; Juliana C N Chan; Elaine Chow Journal: Diabetes Ther Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: Thomas Danne; Munehide Matsuhisa; Christian Sussebach; Harmonie Goyeau; Felipe Lauand; Elisabeth Niemoeller; Geremia B Bolli Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Han Na Jang; Ye Seul Yang; Tae Jung Oh; Bo Kyung Koo; Seong Ok Lee; Kyong Soo Park; Hak Chul Jang; Hye Seung Jung Journal: J Diabetes Investig Date: 2021-08-24 Impact factor: 4.232