| Literature DB >> 30304844 |
Sarath M Vega Gutierrez1, R C Van Court2, Derek W Stone3, Matthew J Konkler4, Emily N Groth5, Seri C Robinson6.
Abstract
Pigments from wood-decay fungi (specifically spalting fungi) have a long history of use in wood art, and have become relevant in modern science due to their longevity and colorfastness. They are presently under investigation as colorants for wood, bamboo, oils, paints and textiles. Major hurdles to their commercialization have been color repeatability (in that the same strain of the same species of fungus may produce different colors over time), and the binding of the pigments to glass storage containers. This is persistent as they do not naturally exist in a loose form. Due to these issues, the 'standard' color for each was historically determined not by the amount of pigment, but by the color in a solution of dichloromethane (DCM), using the CIE L*a*b colorspace. This method of standardization severely limited the use of these pigments in industrial applications, as without a dry form, standard methodologies for repeatable color processing into other materials could not be easily implemented. Recent studies have developed a method to crystalize the red pigment from Scytalidium cuboideum (Sacc. & Ellis) Sigler & Kang, producing a highly pure (99%) solid crystal named 'Dramada'. Herein a method is detailed to compare the molarity of this crystallized pigment to variations in the color, to determine a color saturation curve (by weight) for the pigment from S. cuboideum in DCM and acetone. The molarities for this experiment ranged from 0.024 mM to 19 mM. Each molarity was color read and assigned a CIEL*a*b* value. The results showed that there was a correlation between the molarity and color difference, with the maximum red color occurring between 0.73 mM and 7.3 mM in DCM and between 0.97 mM to 0.73 mM in acetone. Extremely low molarities of pigment produced strong coloration in the solvent, and changes in molarity significantly affected the color of the solution. Having a saturation and color curve for the crystal 'Dramada' from S. cuboideum will allow for the reliable production of distinct colors from a known quantity (by weight) of pigment, erasing the final hurdle towards commercial development of the crystallized pigment from S. cuboideum as an industrial dyestuff.Entities:
Keywords: Dramada; Scytalidium cuboideum; color difference; fungal pigment; molarity; saturation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30304844 PMCID: PMC6222885 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102581
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Molarity vs. ΔL Color Value for the crystal ‘Dramada’ from Scytalidium cuboideum. The upper image corresponds to DCM and the bottom one to acetone.
Figure 2Exponential regression model for the color change relation between color values for the crystal ‘Dramada’ in DCM. Labeled values are the corresponding pigment concentrations (mM).
Figure 3Varying Concentrations of the crystal ‘Dramada’ from Scytalidium cuboideum in DCM. Solution concentrations range from 0.024 mM to 19 mM of the pigment (left to right).
Mean ∆E of the molarities when dissolved in DCM. Different letters classify the data as statistically different within each molarity. DF = 15.
| Solvent | Molarity (mM) |
| Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| DCM | 0.024 | 6.26 (G) | 0.06 |
| 0.048 | 9.13 (G) | 0.97 | |
| 0.073 | 19.03 (F) | 0.54 | |
| 0.097 | 16.01 (F) | 1.27 | |
| 0.24 | 23.92 (E) | 2.82 | |
| 0.48 | 34.34 (D) | 0.56 | |
| 0.73 | 41.87 (A) | 0.56 | |
| 1.2 | 41.72 (A) | 0.70 | |
| 2.4 | 40.97 (A) | 1.71 | |
| 4.8 | 40.72 (AB) | 0.30 | |
| 7.3 | 38.91 (ABC) | 1.20 | |
| 9.7 | 37.14 (BCD) | 2.29 | |
| 14 | 36.93 (DC) | 1.07 | |
| 15 | 37.19 (BCD) | 0.41 | |
| 17 | 36.21 (DC) | 1.29 | |
| 19 | 36.81 (DC) | 0.70 |
Mean L*a*b* values for the Tukey HSD (A) group of S. cuboideum pigment in DCM.
| Molarity (mM) | L* | a* | b* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | 82.14 | 32.72 | 18.99 |
| 1.2 | 81.13 | 32.40 | 18.23 |
| 2.4 | 80.26 | 31.85 | 16.51 |
Mean ∆E of the molarities when dissolved in acetone. Different letters classify the data as statistically different within each molarity. DF = 9.
| Solvent | Molarity (mM) |
| Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetone | 0.024 | 4.39 (H) | 0.18 |
| 0.048 | 8.26 (G) | 0.14 | |
| 0.073 | 11.35 (F) | 0.79 | |
| 0.097 | 14.93 (E) | 0.08 | |
| 0.24 | 26.21 (D) | 1.78 | |
| 0.48 | 35.88 (B) | 0.25 | |
| 0.73 | 38.20 (AB) | 0.49 | |
| 0.97 | 39.36 (A) | 1.38 | |
| 9.7 | 29.64 (C) | 0.72 | |
| 19 | 28.32 (DC) | 1.50 |
Figure 4Varying concentrations of the crystal ‘Dramada’ from Scytalidium cuboideum in acetone. Solution concentrations range from 0.024 mM to 19 mM (left to right).
Solution concentrations (mM) in both DCM and acetone.
| Solution Concentration (mM) |
|---|
| 19 |
| 9.7 |
| 0.73 |
| 0.48 |
| 0.24 |
| 0.097 |
| 0.073 |
| 0.048 |
| 0.024 |