| Literature DB >> 30304814 |
Mohammed Abdulsalam1,2, Hasfalina Che Man3, Aida Isma Idris4, Zurina Zainal Abidin5, Khairul Faezah Yunos6.
Abstract
Palm oil mill effluent contains carcinogenic coloured compounds that are difficult to separate due to their aromatic structure. Though colour treatment using adsorption processes at lower pH (<4) have been reported effectual, due to its acidity the remediated effluent poses an environmental hazard as a result. Thus, the current study focused on achieving decolourization at neutral pH by enhancing the morphology of the coconut shell activated carbon (CSAC) using N₂ as activating-agent with microwave irradiation heating. The microwave pretreated and non-pretreated CSAC were characterized using scanned electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis. A significant modification in the porous structure with a 66.62% increase in the specific surface area was achieved after the pretreatment. The adsorption experimental matrix was developed using the central composite design to investigate the colour adsorption performance under varied pH (6⁻7), dosage (2⁻6 g) and contact time (10⁻100 min). At optimum conditions of neutral pH (7), 3.208 g dosage and contact time of 35 min, the percentage of colour removal was 96.29% with negligible differences compared with the predicted value, 95.855%. The adsorption equilibrium capacity of 1430.1 ADMI × mL/g was attained at the initial colour concentration of 2025 ADMI at 27 °C. The experimental data fitted better with the Freundlich isotherm model with R² 0.9851.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; bio-sorbent; characterization; colour removal; microwave heating; optimization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30304814 PMCID: PMC6209996 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Summary of the experimental design for colour adsorption by the pretreated CSAC.
| Independent Factor | Unit | Symbol | Coded Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |||
| pH | - | A | 6 | 6.5 | 7 |
| Dosage | g | B | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Contact time | minutes | C | 10 | 55 | 100 |
Figure 1SEM photograph at 3000× magnification of: (a) non-pretreated; (b) microwave pretreated CSAC.
Elemental composition of microwave pretreated and non-pretreated CSAC as determined by the EDX.
| Element | Non-Pretreated CSAC | Microwave Pretreated CS-AC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight % | Atom % | Weight % | Atom % | |
| C | 95.03 | 97.58 | 98.93 | 99.36 |
| O | 1.56 S | 1.20 | 0.41 S | 0.28 |
| Si | 0.69 | 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.15 |
| Cl | 1.78 | 0.62 | - | - |
| K | 0.94 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.21 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Figure 2Incremental pore volume versus pore width of the (a) non-pretreated and, (b) microwave pretreated CSAC.
Summary of the BET analysis for both microwave pretreated and non-pretreated CS-AC.
| Parameters | Abbreviation | Non-Pretreated CSAC | Microwave Pre-Treated CSAC | Percentage of Increment % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BET Surface Are (m2/g) | SBET | 421.5786 | 702.4341 | 66.62 | |
| Pore volume (cm3/g) | PV | 0.030 | 0.056 | 86.67 | |
|
| |||||
| Analysis adsorptive | N2 | ||||
| Temperature (K) | 77 | ||||
| Cold free space (cm3) | 60.8085 | ||||
| Warm free space (cm3) | 16.2270 | ||||
| Equilibration interval (s) | 10 | ||||
| Ramp rate (°C/min) | 10 | ||||
| sample density (g/cm3) | 1.000 | ||||
Comparison of coconut shell sorbent specific surface area of the current study and literature data at optimum conditions.
| Reference | Activation Method | Activation Temperature (°C) | Activation Agent | Activation Time (Minutes) | SBET (m2/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current Study | Physical | 850 | Steam | 120 | 421.5786 |
| Physical + Microwave | 900 | Steam + N2 | 10 (microwave) | 702.4341 | |
| Yang et al. [ | Microwave | 900 | Steam + CO2 | 75 | 2194 |
| Su et al. [ | Physical | 850 | - | 60 | 663 |
| Monsalvo et al. [ | Physical | 800 | CO2 | 240 | 97 |
| Li et al. [ | Physical | 850 | N2 + Stream | 60 | 280 |
| Namasivayam and Kadirvelu [ | Physical | 400 | Steam | 60 | 346 |
| Hidayu et al. [ | Physical | 765 | Steam | 77 | 720 |
| Li et al. [ | Physical | 850 | N2 + Steam | 60 | 130 |
| Hesas et al. [ | Physical | 500 | N2 | 120 | 484 |
| Singh et al. [ | Physical | 200-800 | Inert-Atmosphere | 60 | 378 |
| Achaw and Afrane [ | Physical | 800 | Steam + N2 | 120 | 524 |
| Velghe et al. [ | Physical | 450 | N2 | 90 | 60 |
Figure 3Colour removal from POME under variable pH at fixed sorbent dosage and contact time.
Figure 4Colour removal from POME under variable sorbent dosage at fixed pH and contact time.
Figure 5Colour removal from POME under variable contact time at fixed pH and sorbent dosage.
Analysis of variance for the response surface of the quadratic model.
| Source | Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1075.08 | 9 | 119.45 | 13.97 | 0.0001 | significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
Figure 6Experimental actual vs. predicted values of colour removal.
Results of the regression model validation by experiments.
| Recommended Optimal Treatment Conditions | Actual Colour Removal | Deviations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | pH | Dosage | Contact Time | Predicted Colour Removal | ||
| 1 | 7.000 | 3.208 | 35.000 | 95.844 | 96.52 | 0.676 |
| 2 | 7.000 | 3.193 | 35.000 | 95.767 | 96.21 | 0.443 |
| 3 | 7.000 | 3.190 | 35.000 | 95.753 | 96.03 | 0.277 |
| 4 | 7.000 | 3.170 | 35.000 | 95.649 | 95.81 | 0.161 |
| 5 | 7.000 | 3.289 | 35.000 | 96.261 | 96.89 | 0.629 |
| Average Values | 95.855 | 96.292 | 0.437 | |||
Figure 7Colour removal from POME under variable: (a) dosage, B and pH, A; (b) contact time, C and pH, A.
Figure 8Change in adsorption capacity with contact time at a varied initial concentration (at 27 °C).
Important constants of the isotherm models and fitness correlation.
| Isotherm Model | Plotted Variables | Constants | R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/ |
|
| |||
| Freundlich: |
| 0.9758 | 1.031 | 0.8744 | 0.9851 |
| Langmuir: |
|
|
|
| 0.0127 |
| 0.00003 | 1.3780 | 0.7257 | |||