Literature DB >> 30304656

Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis.

Saber D Barbar1, Raphaël Clere-Jehl1, Abderrahmane Bourredjem1, Romain Hernu1, Florent Montini1, Rémi Bruyère1, Christine Lebert1, Julien Bohé1, Julio Badie1, Jean-Pierre Eraldi1, Jean-Philippe Rigaud1, Bruno Levy1, Shidasp Siami1, Guillaume Louis1, Lila Bouadma1, Jean-Michel Constantin1, Emmanuelle Mercier1, Kada Klouche1, Damien du Cheyron1, Gaël Piton1, Djillali Annane1, Samir Jaber1, Thierry van der Linden1, Gilles Blasco1, Jean-Paul Mira1, Carole Schwebel1, Loïc Chimot1, Philippe Guiot1, Mai-Anh Nay1, Ferhat Meziani1, Julie Helms1, Claire Roger1, Benjamin Louart1, Remi Trusson1, Auguste Dargent1, Christine Binquet1, Jean-Pierre Quenot1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury is the most frequent complication in patients with septic shock and is an independent risk factor for death. Although renal-replacement therapy is the standard of care for severe acute kidney injury, the ideal time for initiation remains controversial.
METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned patients with early-stage septic shock who had severe acute kidney injury at the failure stage of the risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) classification system but without life-threatening complications related to acute kidney injury to receive renal-replacement therapy either within 12 hours after documentation of failure-stage acute kidney injury (early strategy) or after a delay of 48 hours if renal recovery had not occurred (delayed strategy). The failure stage of the RIFLE classification system is characterized by a serum creatinine level 3 times the baseline level (or ≥4 mg per deciliter with a rapid increase of ≥0.5 mg per deciliter), urine output less than 0.3 ml per kilogram of body weight per hour for 24 hours or longer, or anuria for at least 12 hours. The primary outcome was death at 90 days.
RESULTS: The trial was stopped early for futility after the second planned interim analysis. A total of 488 patients underwent randomization; there were no significant between-group differences in the characteristics at baseline. Among the 477 patients for whom follow-up data at 90 days were available, 58% of the patients in the early-strategy group (138 of 239 patients) and 54% in the delayed-strategy group (128 of 238 patients) had died (P=0.38). In the delayed-strategy group, 38% (93 patients) did not receive renal-replacement therapy. Criteria for emergency renal-replacement therapy were met in 17% of the patients in the delayed-strategy group (41 patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with septic shock who had severe acute kidney injury, there was no significant difference in overall mortality at 90 days between patients who were assigned to an early strategy for the initiation of renal-replacement therapy and those who were assigned to a delayed strategy. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health; IDEAL-ICU ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682590 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30304656     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  125 in total

Review 1.  Acute Renal Failure of Nosocomial Origin.

Authors:  Mark Dominik Alscher; Christiane Erley; Martin K Kuhlmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Targeting protein translation to prevent septic kidney injury.

Authors:  Sarah C Huen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  [Focus on nephrology : Intensive medical care studies from 2018-2019].

Authors:  C Nusshag; C Beynon; M Dietrich; A Hecker; C Jungk; D Michalski; K Schmidt; M A Weigand; C J Reuß; M Bernhard; T Brenner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Focus on critical care nephrology.

Authors:  Michaël Darmon; Michael Joannidis; Miet Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  IDEAL-ICU in Context.

Authors:  David E Leaf; Sushrut S Waikar
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  No "optimal timing" of renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

7.  Initiation of renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis: more to it than meets the eye.

Authors:  Fabrice Uhel; Hessel Peters-Sengers; Tom van der Poll
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

8.  Outcomes of renal replacement therapy in the critically ill with COVID-19.

Authors:  E Burke; E Haber; C W Pike; R Sonti
Journal:  Med Intensiva (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-02-18

Review 9.  Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Who, When, Why, and How.

Authors:  Srijan Tandukar; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Efficacy and prognosis of continuous renal replacement therapy at different times in the treatment of patients with sepsis-induced acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Na An; Ruman Chen; Yafei Bai; Mingzhi Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.