Literature DB >> 30304472

Detection of epigenetic field defects using a weighted epigenetic distance-based method.

Ya Wang1, Min Qian1, Peifeng Ruan2, Andrew E Teschendorff3,4, Shuang Wang1.   

Abstract

Identifying epigenetic field defects, notably early DNA methylation alterations, is important for early cancer detection. Research has suggested these early methylation alterations are infrequent across samples and identifiable as outlier samples. Here we developed a weighted epigenetic distance-based method characterizing (dis)similarity in methylation measures at multiple CpGs in a gene or a genetic region between pairwise samples, with weights to up-weight signal CpGs and down-weight noise CpGs. Using distance-based approaches, weak signals that might be filtered out in a CpG site-level analysis could be accumulated and therefore boost the overall study power. In constructing epigenetic distances, we considered both differential methylation (DM) and differential variability (DV) signals. We demonstrated the superior performance of the proposed weighted epigenetic distance-based method over non-weighted versions and site-level EWAS (epigenome-wide association studies) methods in simulation studies. Application to breast cancer methylation data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) comparing normal-adjacent tissue to tumor of breast cancer patients and normal tissue of independent age-matched cancer-free women identified novel epigenetic field defects that were missed by EWAS methods, when majority were previously reported to be associated with breast cancer and were confirmed the progression to breast cancer. We further replicated some of the identified epigenetic field defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30304472      PMCID: PMC6326818          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  55 in total

Review 1.  Gene silencing in cancer in association with promoter hypermethylation.

Authors:  James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The history of cancer epigenetics.

Authors:  Andrew P Feinberg; Benjamin Tycko
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  limmaGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray data.

Authors:  James M Wettenhall; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Multivariate regression analysis of distance matrices for testing associations between gene expression patterns and related variables.

Authors:  Matthew A Zapala; Nicholas J Schork
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Powerful multi-marker association tests: unifying genomic distance-based regression and logistic regression.

Authors:  Fang Han; Wei Pan
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Methylome sequencing in triple-negative breast cancer reveals distinct methylation clusters with prognostic value.

Authors:  Clare Stirzaker; Elena Zotenko; Jenny Z Song; Wenjia Qu; Shalima S Nair; Warwick J Locke; Andrew Stone; Nicola J Armstong; Mark D Robinson; Alexander Dobrovic; Kelly A Avery-Kiejda; Kate M Peters; Juliet D French; Sandra Stein; Darren J Korbie; Matt Trau; John F Forbes; Rodney J Scott; Melissa A Brown; Glenn D Francis; Susan J Clark
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Downregulation of zinc finger protein 132 in prostate cancer is associated with aberrant promoter hypermethylation and poor prognosis.

Authors:  Mette Opstrup Abildgaard; Michael Borre; Martin Mørck Mortensen; Benedicte P Ulhøi; Niels Tørring; Peter Wild; Helle Kristensen; Francisco Mansilla; Peter D Ottosen; Lars Dyrskjøt; Torben F Ørntoft; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Genomic amplification and a role in drug-resistance for the KDM5A histone demethylase in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jinling Hou; Jack Wu; Alan Dombkowski; Kezhong Zhang; Andreana Holowatyj; Julie L Boerner; Zeng-Quan Yang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  An in vivo RNAi screen identifies SALL1 as a tumor suppressor in human breast cancer with a role in CDH1 regulation.

Authors:  J Wolf; K Müller-Decker; C Flechtenmacher; F Zhang; M Shahmoradgoli; G B Mills; J D Hoheisel; M Boettcher
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Genomic subtypes of breast cancer identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization display distinct molecular and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Göran Jönsson; Johan Staaf; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Markus Ringnér; Karolina Holm; Cecilia Hegardt; Haukur Gunnarsson; Rainer Fagerholm; Carina Strand; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Outi Kilpivaara; Lena Luts; Päivi Heikkilä; Kristiina Aittomäki; Carl Blomqvist; Niklas Loman; Per Malmström; Håkan Olsson; Oskar Th Johannsson; Adalgeir Arason; Heli Nevanlinna; Rosa B Barkardottir; Ake Borg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Integration of Epigenetic Mechanisms into Non-Genotoxic Carcinogenicity Hazard Assessment: Focus on DNA Methylation and Histone Modifications.

Authors:  Daniel Desaulniers; Paule Vasseur; Abigail Jacobs; M Cecilia Aguila; Norman Ertych; Miriam N Jacobs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  A powerful and flexible weighted distance-based method incorporating interactions between DNA methylation and environmental factors on health outcomes.

Authors:  Ya Wang; Min Qian; Deliang Tang; Julie Herbstman; Frederica Perera; Shuang Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.