| Literature DB >> 30304439 |
Marcus A Badgeley1,2,3, Manway Liu3, Benjamin S Glicksberg4, Mark Shervey1,2, John Zech5, Khader Shameer6, Joseph Lehar7, Eric K Oermann8, Michael V McConnell3,9, Thomas M Snyder3, Joel T Dudley1,2.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Radiologists have used algorithms for Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) for decades. These algorithms use machine learning with engineered features, and there have been mixed findings on whether they improve radiologists' interpretations. Deep learning offers superior performance but requires more training data and has not been evaluated in joint algorithm-radiologist decision systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30304439 PMCID: PMC6499410 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty855
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinformatics ISSN: 1367-4803 Impact factor: 6.931
Fig. 1.Annotation modalities and distinct uses. (A) The CANDI radiograph annotation (RAD) and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) applications provide human-algorithm interfaces to generate training annotations and evaluate the subsequent models. Different annotation data modalities provide training data for distinct deep learning model utilities. We use convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to generate predictions in CANDI-CAD. (B) Various input/output systems are set up that conform to the security needs of different types of users