Literature DB >> 30304425

Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Alison G Cahill1, Sindhu K Srinivas2, Alan T N Tita3,4, Aaron B Caughey5, Holly E Richter3,4, W Thomas Gregory5, Jingxia Liu6, Candice Woolfolk1, David L Weinstein1, Amit M Mathur7, George A Macones1, Methodius G Tuuli1.   

Abstract

Importance: It is unclear whether the timing of second stage pushing efforts affects spontaneous vaginal delivery rates and reduces morbidities. Objective: To evaluate whether immediate or delayed pushing results in higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and lower rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial of nulliparous women at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation admitted for spontaneous or induced labor with neuraxial analgesia between May 2014 and December 2017 at 6 US medical centers. The interim analysis suggested futility for the primary outcome and recruitment was terminated with 2414 of 3184 planned participants. Follow-up ended January 4, 2018. Interventions: Randomization occurred when participants reached complete cervical dilation. Immediate group participants (n = 1200) began pushing immediately. Delayed group participants (n = 1204) were instructed to wait 60 minutes. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was spontaneous vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes included total duration of the second stage, duration of active pushing, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, perineal lacerations (≥second degree), and a composite outcome of neonatal morbidity that included neonatal death and 9 other adverse outcomes.
Results: Among 2414 women randomized (mean age, 26.5 years), 2404 (99.6%) completed the trial. The rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery was 85.9% in the immediate group vs 86.5% in the delayed group, and was not significantly different (absolute difference, -0.6% [95% CI, -3.4% to 2.1%]; relative risk, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.03]). There was no significant difference in 5 of the 9 prespecified secondary outcomes reported, including the composite outcome of neonatal morbidity (7.3% for the immediate group vs 8.9% for the delayed group; between-group difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -3.8% to 0.5%]) and perineal lacerations (45.9% vs 46.4%, respectively; between-group difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -4.4% to 3.6%]). The immediate group had significantly shorter mean duration of the second stage compared with the delayed group (102.4 vs 134.2 minutes, respectively; mean difference, -31.8 minutes [95% CI, -36.7 to -26.9], P < .001), despite a significantly longer mean duration of active pushing (83.7 vs 74.5 minutes; mean difference, 9.2 minutes [95% CI, 5.8 to 12.6], P < .001), lower rates of chorioamnionitis (6.7% vs 9.1%; between-group difference, -2.5% [95% CI, -4.6% to -0.3%], P = .005), and fewer postpartum hemorrhages (2.3% vs 4.0%; between-group difference, -1.7% [95% CI, -3.1% to -0.4%], P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: Among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial anesthesia, the timing of second stage pushing efforts did not affect the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. These findings may help inform decisions about the preferred timing of second stage pushing efforts, when considered with other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02137200.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30304425      PMCID: PMC6583005          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  7 in total

1.  PURL: Immediate or delayed pushing in the second stage of labor?

Authors:  Jessica Devitt; Corey Lyon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Impact of pushing timing on occult injury of levator ani: secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

Authors:  W Thomas Gregory; Alison G Cahill; Candice Woolfolk; Jerry L Lowder; Aaron B Caughey; Sindhu K Srinivas; Alan T N Tita; Methodius G Tuuli; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 10.693

3.  Redefining Second Stage of Labor: Number of Pushing Contractions.

Authors:  Serin M Bok; Gabriela E Pena Carmona; Jake Crawford; Ramy Eskander; Mina Desai; Michael G Ross
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2020-06-19

4.  The clinical characteristics of perineal tears: A study carried out on 14 pregnant women in a tertiary center: Case series.

Authors:  Hugues Cakwira; Marcelin Mukengere; Baraka Lucien; Abdullahi Tunde Aborode; Leonard Sironge; Meni Vhosi Michael; Aymar Akilimali
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 5.  Labor and delivery guidance for COVID-19.

Authors:  Rupsa C Boelig; Tracy Manuck; Emily A Oliver; Daniele Di Mascio; Gabriele Saccone; Federica Bellussi; Vincenzo Berghella
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-03-25

6.  The impact of stage of labor on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiparous women: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Li Wang; Hongxia Wang; Lu Jia; Wenjie Qing; Fan Li; Jie Zhou
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Evaluation of Epidural Analgesia Use During Labor and Infection in Full-term Neonates Delivered Vaginally.

Authors:  Lijie Jia; Huimin Cao; Yuna Guo; Ying Shen; Xiaoyu Zhang; Zhou Feng; Jiangruixuan Liu; Zhongcong Xie; Zifeng Xu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.