Literature DB >> 30303916

Survival of Women With Type I and II Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Detected by Ultrasound Screening.

John R van Nagell1, Brian T Burgess, Rachel W Miller, Lauren Baldwin, Christopher P DeSimone, Frederick R Ueland, Bin Huang, Quan Chen, Richard J Kryscio, Edward J Pavlik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of ultrasound screening on stage at detection and long-term disease-specific survival of at-risk women with epithelial ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Eligibility included all asymptomatic women 50 years of age or older and women 25 years of age or older with a documented family history of ovarian cancer. From 1987 to 2017, 46,101 women received annual ultrasound screening in a prospective cohort trial. Women with a persisting abnormal screen underwent tumor morphology indexing, serum biomarker analysis, and surgery.
RESULTS: Seventy-one invasive epithelial ovarian cancers and 17 epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential were detected. No women with a low malignant potential tumor experienced recurrent disease. Stage distribution for screen-detected invasive epithelial ovarian cancers was stage I-30 (42%), stage II-15 (21%), stage III-26 (37%), and stage IV-0 (0%). Follow-up varied from 9.2 months to 27 years (mean 7.9 years). Disease-specific survival at 5, 10, and 20 years for women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer detected by screening was 86±4%, 68±7%, and 65±7%, respectively, vs 45±2%, 31±2%, and 19±3%, respectively, for unscreened women with clinically detected ovarian cancer from the same geographic area who were treated at the same institution by the same treatment protocols (P<.001). Twenty-seven percent of screen-detected malignancies were type I and 73% were type II. The disease-specific survival of women with type I and type II screen-detected tumors was significantly higher than that of women with clinically detected type I and type II tumors and was related directly to earlier stage at detection.
CONCLUSION: Annual ultrasound screening of at-risk asymptomatic women was associated with lower stage at detection and increased 5-, 10-, and 20-year disease-specific survival of women with both type I and type II epithelial ovarian cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: OnCore Clinical Trials Management System, NCI-2013-01954.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30303916      PMCID: PMC9373050          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


  34 in total

1.  Risk of malignancy in sonographically confirmed septated cystic ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Brook A Saunders; Iwona Podzielinski; Rachel A Ware; Scott Goodrich; Christopher P DeSimone; Fred R Ueland; Leigh Seamon; Jessalyn Ubellacker; Edward J Pavlik; Richard J Kryscio; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Rachel Hallett; Andy Ryan; Matthew Burnell; Aarti Sharma; Sara Lewis; Susan Davies; Susan Philpott; Alberto Lopes; Keith Godfrey; David Oram; Jonathan Herod; Karin Williamson; Mourad W Seif; Ian Scott; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; John Murdoch; Stephen Dobbs; Nazar N Amso; Simon Leeson; Derek Cruickshank; Alistair McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Lesley Fallowfield; Naveena Singh; Anne Dawnay; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumors less than 10 centimeters in diameter.

Authors:  Susan C Modesitt; Edward J Pavlik; Frederick R Ueland; Paul D DePriest; R J Kryscio; J R van Nagell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  A randomized study of screening for ovarian cancer: a multicenter study in Japan.

Authors:  H Kobayashi; Y Yamada; T Sado; M Sakata; S Yoshida; R Kawaguchi; S Kanayama; H Shigetomi; S Haruta; Y Tsuji; S Ueda; T Kitanaka
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Preoperative differentiation of malignant from benign ovarian tumors: the efficacy of morphology indexing and Doppler flow sonography.

Authors:  F R Ueland; P D DePriest; E J Pavlik; R J Kryscio; J R van Nagell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Metabolic syndrome after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at high risk for hereditary breast ovarian cancer: a controlled observational study.

Authors:  Trond M Michelsen; Are H Pripp; Serena Tonstad; Claes G Tropé; Anne Dørum
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States: Secondary Analysis of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Haley A Moss; Andrew Berchuck; Megan L Neely; Evan R Myers; Laura J Havrilesky
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients.

Authors:  Holly LaDuca; A J Stuenkel; Jill S Dolinsky; Steven Keiles; Stephany Tandy; Tina Pesaran; Elaine Chen; Chia-Ling Gau; Erika Palmaer; Kamelia Shoaepour; Divya Shah; Virginia Speare; Stephanie Gandomi; Elizabeth Chao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Survival Advantage Associated with Decrease in Stage at Detection from Stage IIIC to Stage IIIA Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  John Hoff; Lauren Baldwin; Jason Lefringhouse; Edward Pavlik; Rachel Miller; Christopher DeSimone; Frederick Ueland; Thomas Tucker; Richard Kryscio; J R van Nagell
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  The cost-effectiveness of screening for ovarian cancer: results from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Usha Menon; Alistair J McGuire; Maria Raikou; Andy Ryan; Susan K Davies; Matthew Burnell; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Jatinderpal K Kalsi; Naveena Singh; Nazar N Amso; Derek Cruickshank; Stephen Dobbs; Keith Godfrey; Jonathan Herod; Simon Leeson; Tim Mould; John Murdoch; David Oram; Ian Scott; Mourad W Seif; Karin Williamson; Robert Woolas; Lesley Fallowfield; Stuart Campbell; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Ian J Jacobs
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  The global burden and associated factors of ovarian cancer in 1990-2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors:  Shiwen Zhang; Chen Cheng; Zejian Lin; Linzi Xiao; Xin Su; Lu Zheng; Yingjun Mu; Minqi Liao; Ruiqing Ouyang; Wanlin Li; Junrong Ma; Jun Cai; Lu Liu; Donghong Wang; Fangfang Zeng; Jun Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.135

2.  Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Matthew Burnell; Naveena Singh; Andy Ryan; Chloe Karpinskyj; Giulia Carlino; Julie Taylor; Susan K Massingham; Maria Raikou; Jatinderpal K Kalsi; Robert Woolas; Ranjit Manchanda; Rupali Arora; Laura Casey; Anne Dawnay; Stephen Dobbs; Simon Leeson; Tim Mould; Mourad W Seif; Aarti Sharma; Karin Williamson; Yiling Liu; Lesley Fallowfield; Alistair J McGuire; Stuart Campbell; Steven J Skates; Ian J Jacobs; Mahesh Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Mechanisms of High-Grade Serous Carcinogenesis in the Fallopian Tube and Ovary: Current Hypotheses, Etiologic Factors, and Molecular Alterations.

Authors:  Isao Otsuka
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Assessing the Costs of Screening for Ovarian Cancer in the United States: An Evolving Analysis.

Authors:  Justin W Gorski; McKell Quattrone; John R van Nagell; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-25

5.  Biomarkers and Strategies for Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Robert C Bast; Zhen Lu; Chae Young Han; Karen H Lu; Karen S Anderson; Charles W Drescher; Steven J Skates
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Screening and Prevention for High-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary Based on Carcinogenesis-Fallopian Tube- and Ovarian-Derived Tumors and Incessant Retrograde Bleeding.

Authors:  Isao Otsuka; Takuto Matsuura
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22

7.  Performance Characteristics of the Ultrasound Strategy during Incidence Screening in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).

Authors:  Jatinderpal Kalsi; Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj; Andy Ryan; Naveena Singh; Matthew Burnell; Susan Massingham; Sophia Apostolidou; Aarti Sharma; Karin Williamson; Mourad Seif; Tim Mould; Robert Woolas; Stephen Dobbs; Simon Leeson; Lesley Fallowfield; Steven J Skates; Mahesh Parmar; Stuart Campbell; Ian Jacobs; Alistair McGuire; Usha Menon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Ultrasonographic Visualization of the Ovaries to Detect Ovarian Cancer According to Age, Menopausal Status and Body Type.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Emily Brekke; Justin Gorski; Lauren Baldwin-Branch; Rachel Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Charles S Dietrich; Holly S Gallion; Frederick Rand Ueland; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06

9.  Significance of Pelvic Fluid Observed during Ovarian Cancer Screening with Transvaginal Sonogram.

Authors:  Justin W Gorski; Charles S Dietrich; Caeli Davis; Lindsay Erol; Hayley Dietrich; Nicholas J Per; Emily Lenk Ferrell; Anthony B McDowell; McKayla J Riggs; Megan L Hutchcraft; Lauren A Baldwin-Branch; Rachel W Miller; Christopher P DeSimone; Holly H Gallion; Frederick R Ueland; John R van Nagell; Edward J Pavlik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07

10.  Subsequent Ultrasonographic Non-Visualization of the Ovaries Is Hastened in Women with Only One Ovary Visualized Initially.

Authors:  Edward J Pavlik; Hannah Fancher; Charles S Dietrich; John R van Nagell
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.