Frederik Geisler1, Syed F Ali2, Martin Ebinger3, Alexander Kunz1, Michal Rozanski1, Carolin Waldschmidt1, Joachim E Weber1, Matthias Wendt4, Benjamin Winter5, Lee H Schwamm6, Heinrich J Audebert1,7. 1. 1 Department of Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 2. 2 Department of Neurology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA. 3. 3 Department of Neurology, Medical Park Berlin Humboldtmühle, Berlin, Germany. 4. 4 Department of Neurology, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 5. 5 Department of Neurology, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Potsdam-Sanssouci, Germany. 6. 6 Department of Neurology, MGH Stroke Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. 7 Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with a sudden onset of focal neurological deficits consistent with stroke, who turn out to have alternative conditions, have been labeled stroke mimics. AIMS: We assessed a recently validated telemedicine-based stroke mimic score (TeleStroke mimic score; TM-score) and individual patient characteristics with regard to its discriminative value between cerebrovascular disease and stroke mimic patients in the in-person, pre-hospital setting. METHODS: We evaluated patients cared for in a mobile stroke unit in Berlin, Germany. We investigated whether the TM-score (comprising six parameters), Face Arm Speech Time test, and individual patient characteristics were able to differentiate cerebrovascular disease from stroke mimic patients. RESULTS: We included 423 patients (299 (70.7%) cerebrovascular disease and 124 (29.3%) stroke mimic) in the final analysis. A TM-score > 30 indicated a high probability of a cerebrovascular disease and a score ≤15 of a stroke mimic. The TM-score performed well to identify stroke mimics (area under the curve of 0.74 under receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis). The cerebrovascular disease patients were older (74.8 vs. 69.8 years, p = 0.001), had more often severe strokes (NIHSS > 14 25.8% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.001), presented more often with weakness of the face (70.9% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.001) or arm (60.9% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.001), dysarthria (59.5% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.001), history of atrial fibrillation (38.1% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (78.9% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001), and less often with seizure (0.7% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TM-score and certain patient characteristics can help paramedics and emergency physicians in the field to identify stroke mimic patients and select the most appropriate hospital destination.
BACKGROUND:Patients with a sudden onset of focal neurological deficits consistent with stroke, who turn out to have alternative conditions, have been labeled stroke mimics. AIMS: We assessed a recently validated telemedicine-based stroke mimic score (TeleStroke mimic score; TM-score) and individual patient characteristics with regard to its discriminative value between cerebrovascular disease and stroke mimic patients in the in-person, pre-hospital setting. METHODS: We evaluated patients cared for in a mobile stroke unit in Berlin, Germany. We investigated whether the TM-score (comprising six parameters), Face Arm Speech Time test, and individual patient characteristics were able to differentiate cerebrovascular disease from stroke mimic patients. RESULTS: We included 423 patients (299 (70.7%) cerebrovascular disease and 124 (29.3%) stroke mimic) in the final analysis. A TM-score > 30 indicated a high probability of a cerebrovascular disease and a score ≤15 of a stroke mimic. The TM-score performed well to identify stroke mimics (area under the curve of 0.74 under receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis). The cerebrovascular diseasepatients were older (74.8 vs. 69.8 years, p = 0.001), had more often severe strokes (NIHSS > 14 25.8% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.001), presented more often with weakness of the face (70.9% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.001) or arm (60.9% vs. 33.9%, p = 0.001), dysarthria (59.5% vs. 40.3%, p < 0.001), history of atrial fibrillation (38.1% vs. 21.0%, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (78.9% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001), and less often with seizure (0.7% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The TM-score and certain patient characteristics can help paramedics and emergency physicians in the field to identify stroke mimic patients and select the most appropriate hospital destination.
Authors: Frederik Geisler; Medschid Wesirow; Martin Ebinger; Alexander Kunz; Michal Rozanski; Carolin Waldschmidt; Joachim E Weber; Matthias Wendt; Benjamin Winter; Heinrich J Audebert Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2021-01-06