Literature DB >> 30303804

Strategies for Implementing a Standardized Structured Radiology Reporting Program.

David B Larson1.   

Abstract

Radiology practices are increasingly implementing standardized report templates to overcome the drawbacks of individual templates. However, implementing a standardized structured reporting program is not necessarily straightforward. This article provides practical guidance for radiologists who wish to implement standardized structured reporting in their practice. Challenges that radiology groups encounter tend to fall into two categories: technical and organizational. Defining and carrying out technical work can be tedious but tends to be relatively straightforward, whereas overcoming organizational challenges often requires changes in individuals' strongly held values, beliefs, roles, and relationships. Established organizational change models can help frame the organizational strategy to implement a standardized structured reporting program. Once leadership support is secured, a standardized structured reporting committee can be convened to establish report priorities, standards, design principles, and guidelines. Report standards help to establish the common framework upon which all report templates are constructed, helping to ensure report consistency. By using these standards, committee members can create reports relevant to their subspecialties, which can then be edited for formatting and content. Once report templates have been developed, edited, and published, an abbreviated form of the same process can be used to maintain the reports, which can be accomplished with much less effort than that initially required to create the templates. After standardized structured report templates are implemented and become embedded in practice, most radiologists eventually appreciate the merits of the program. ©RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30303804     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Audiovisual Reports to Enhance Traditional Emergency Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports.

Authors:  Luís Pecci Neto; Ivan R B Godoy; André Fukunishi Yamada; Henrique Carrete; Dany Jasinowodolinski; Abdalla Skaf
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Structured and shared CT radiological report of gastric cancer: a consensus proposal by the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) and the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM).

Authors:  Maria Antonietta Mazzei; Giulio Bagnacci; Francesco Gentili; Iacopo Capitoni; Gianni Mura; Daniele Marrelli; Roberto Petrioli; Luca Brunese; Salvatore Cappabianca; Marco Catarci; Maurizio Degiuli; Giovanni De Manzoni; Marco De Prizio; Annibale Donini; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Luigi Funicelli; Andrea Laghi; Giuseppe Minetti; Paolo Morgagni; Enrico Petrella; Frida Pittiani; Stefano Rausei; Laura Romanini; Riccardo Rosati; Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora; Guido A M Tiberio; Luca Volterrani; Franco Roviello; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound examinations.

Authors:  Benjamin P Ernst; Mohamed Hodeib; Sebastian Strieth; Julian Künzel; Fabian Bischof; Berit Hackenberg; Tilmann Huppertz; Veronika Weber; Katharina Bahr; Jonas Eckrich; Jan Hagemann; Matthias Engelbarts; Matthias F Froelich; Philipp Solbach; Richard Linke; Christoph Matthias; Wieland H Sommer; Sven Becker
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 4.  Communicating with the hepatobiliary surgeon through structured report.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Adele Taibbi; Salvatore Pardo; Giuseppe Lo Re; Ludovico La Grutta; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-04-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.